Social Protection for Asylum Seekers and Refugees in Glasgow

Journal title MONDI MIGRANTI
Author/s Niroshan Ramachandran
Publishing Year 2019 Issue 2019/3
Language English Pages 19 P. 105-123 File size 209 KB
DOI 10.3280/MM2019-003006
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This paper explores the experiences of asylum seekers and refugees’ access to so-cial protection in Glasgow. A significant amount of evidence suggests that the con-trolling and exclusionary policies in the UK have affected social protection of asy-lum seekers and refugees by contributing to diminished social support and re-strictions on service provision. As a result, asylum seekers and refugees are facing difficulties and challenges in access to social protection which is hindering their survival and integration in the UK. Given that, the findings of this study emphasise on the different social protection strategies applied by the asylum seekers and ref-ugees to access social protection. Significantly, this paper explores the role of local informal networks and the third sector organisations in facilitating access to for-mal social protection.

Keywords: Asylum seekers and refugees; social protection; third sector; informal networks; assemblage; transnational ties.

  1. Mayblin L. (2017). Imagining asylum, governing asylum seekers: Complexity reduction and policy making in the uk Home Office. Migration Studies. (December), pp. 1-20.
  2. Al-Ali N. (2002). Gender relations, transnational ties and rituals among Bosnian refugees. Global Networks, 2, 3: 249-262.
  3. Amelina A., Bilecen B., Barglowski K. and Faist T. (2012). Ties That Protect? The Significance of Transnationality for the Distribution of Informal Social Protection in Migrant Networks, No. 6.
  4. Avato J., Koettl J. and Sabates-Wheeler R. (2010). Social Security Regimes, Global Estimates, and Good Practices: The Status of Social Protection for International Migrants. World Development, 38, 4: 455-466.
  5. Barglowski K. (2015). On the Assemblages of Informal and Formal Transnational Social Protection. 214 (October 2014), pp. 203-214.
  6. Bash L.G., Glick Schiller N. and Szanton Blanc C. (1994). Nations unbound : transnational projects, postcolonial predicaments, and deterritorialized nation-states. Published in 1994 in London by Routledge. Gordon and Breach.
  7. Bilecen B. (2019). ‘Altın Günü’: migrant women’s social protection networks. Comparative Migration Studies, 7, 11: 1-17.
  8. Bilecen B., Gamper, M., and Lubbers M.J. (2018). The missing link: Social network analysis in migration and transnationalism. Social Networks. 53: 1-3.
  9. Björngren Cuadra C. and Staaf A. (2014). Public Social Services’ encounters with irregular migrants in Sweden: amid values of social work and control of migration. European Journal of Social Work, 17, 10: 88-103.
  10. Boccagni P. (2016). Addressing transnational needs through migration? An inquiry into the reach and consequences of migrants’ social protection across borders. Global Social Policy, 17, 2: 168-187.
  11. Boccagni P. (2013). “Whom should We Help First?” Transnational Helping Practices in Ecuadorian Migration. International Migration, 51, 2: 191-208.
  12. Braun V. and Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Using Qualitative Research in Psychology.
  13. Bryant A. (2017). Grounded theory and grounded theorizing: pragmatism in research practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
  14. Cosla (2018). Asylum Seekers. Cosla Strategic Migration Partnership [online] -- [Accessed 2 Jun 2018].
  15. Creswell J.W. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. 2nd ed. Sage Publications.
  16. Dako Gyeke M. and Adu E. (2017). Challenges and coping strategies of refugees: Exploring residual Liberian refugees??? experiences in Ghana. Qualitative Social Work, 16, 1: 96-112.
  17. Dean J., Wollin J., Stewart D., Debattista J. and Mitchell M. (2012). Hidden yet visible: Methodological challenges researching sexual health in Sudanese refugee communities. Culture, Health and Sexuality.
  18. Denzin N.K. and Lincoln Y.S. (2008). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 3rd ed. Sage Publications.
  19. Faist T. (2013). Transnational Social Protection: An Emerging Field of Study. Bielefeld: No. 113.
  20. Faist T. and Bilecen B. (2015). Social Inequalities Through the Lens of Social Protection: Notes on the Transnational Social Question. Population, Space and Place, 21, 3: 282-293.
  21. Faist T., Bilecen B., Barglowski K. and Sienkiewicz J.J. (2015). Transnational Social Protection: Migrants’ Strategies and Patterns of Inequalities. Population, Space and Place, 21, 3: 193-202.
  22. Fereday J. and Muir-Cochrane E. (2006). Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 1: 80-92.
  23. Fergguson H. (2016). Researching Social Work Practice Close Up: Using Ethnographic and Mobile Methods to Understand Encounters between Social Workers, Children and Families. British Journal of Social Work, 46, 1: 153-168.
  24. Gale N.K., Heath G., Cameron E., Rashid S. and Redwood (2013). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC medical research methodology, 13: 117.
  25. Gillham B. (2005). Research Interviewing: The Range Of Techniques: A Practical Guide. Book.
  26. Van Ginneken W. (2013). Social Protection for Migrant Workers: National and International Policy Changes. European Journal of Social Security, 15, 2.
  27. Grillo R. and Mazzucato V. (2008). Africa < > Europe: A Double Engagement. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34, 2: 175-198.
  28. Harvey-Jordan S. and Long S. (2001). The process and the pitfalls of semi-structured interviews. Community Practitioner.
  29. Hayes D. and Spratt (2009). Child Welfare Interventions: Patterns of Social Work Practice. British Journal of Social Work, 39, 8: 1575-1597.
  30. Heckathorn D.D. (2011). Snowball Versus Respondent-Driven Sampling. Sociological methodology, 41, 1: 355-366.
  31. Hek R. (2005). The Experiences and Needs of Refugee and Asylum Seeking Children in the uk: A Literature Review.
  32. Holzmann R. (2007). Social Protection for International Migrants.
  33. Kearns A. and Whitley E. (2015). Getting There? The Effects of Functional Factors, Time and Place on the Social Integration of Migrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41, 13: 2105-2129.
  34. Lietz C.A. and Zayas L.E. (2010). Evaluating Qualitative Research for Social Work Practitioners. Advances in Social Work.
  35. Long K. (2013). When refugees stopped being migrants: Movement, labour and humanitarian protection. Migration Studies, 1, 1: 4-26.
  36. Long K. and Sabates-Wheeler R. (2017). Migration, Forced Displacement and Social Protection. Gsdrc Rapid Literature Review. Birmingham, uk.
  37. Miles M.B., Huberman A.M. and Saldaña J. (2013). Qualitative data analysis. 3rd ed. Sage.
  38. Morrow S.L. (2007). Qualitative Research in Counseling Psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 35, 2: 209-235.
  39. Mulvey G. (2015). Refugee Integration Policy: The Effects of uk Policy-Making on Refugees in Scotland. Journal of Social Policy, 44, 2: 357-375.
  40. Nowell L.S., Norris J.M., White D.E. and Moules N.J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16: 1-13.
  41. Oecd (2007). The Social Expenditure database: An Interpretive Guide.
  42. Palinkas L.A., Horwitz S.M., Green C.A., Wisdom J.P., Duan N. and Hoagwood K. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and policy in mental health, 42, 5: 533-544.
  43. Patton M.Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 4th ed. Sage Publications.
  44. Phillimore J. (2017). Embedded Integration and Organisational Change in Housing Providers in the uk. Social Policy and Society, 16, 01: 1-14.
  45. Phillimore J. (2012). Implementing integration in the uk: Lessons for integration theory, policy and practice. Policy and politics, 40, 4: 1-21.
  46. Poros M. (2011). Migrant Social Networks: Vehicles for Migration, Integration, and Development. Migration Policy Institute [online] -- [Accessed 5 Aug 2019].
  47. Sabates-Wheeler R. and Feldman R. (2011). Migration and Social Protection: Claiming Social Rights Beyond Borders. Palgrave Macmillan.
  48. Sabates-Wheeler R. and Koettl J. (2010). Social protection for migrants: The challenges of delivery in the context of changing migration flows. International Social Security Review, 63, 3-4: 115-144.
  49. Scottish Government (2018). New Scots Refugee Integration Strategy 2018-2022 [online] -- [Accessed 2 Jun 2018].
  50. Scottish Refugee Council (2018). Research reports about asylum seekers and refugees in Scotland [online] -- [Accessed 1 Jun 2018].
  51. Serra Mingot E. and Mazzucato V. (2018). Providing social protection to mobile populations: symbiotic relationships between migrants and welfare institutions. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, pp. 1-17.
  52. Stemler S. (2001). An Overview of Content Analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 7, 17: 1-6.
  53. Strang A., Baillot H. and Mignard E. (2017). ‘I want to participate’. Transition experiences of new refugees in Glasgow. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44, 2: 197-214.
  54. Timonen V., Foley G. and Conlon C. (2018). Challenges When Using Grounded Theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17, 1: 160940691875808

Niroshan Ramachandran, Social Protection for Asylum Seekers and Refugees in Glasgow in "MONDI MIGRANTI" 3/2019, pp 105-123, DOI: 10.3280/MM2019-003006