Family Between the Individual and Political Society. A Study On Hobbes’s Theory of the Family

Author/s Liang Pang
Publishing Year 2024 Issue 2023/4
Language English Pages 20 P. 560-579 File size 299 KB
DOI 10.3280/SF2023-004003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In modern Western political thinking, the family does not feature in the relationship between individuals and the State. The article argues that it is Hobbes who made a decisive contribution to this circumstance by making individuals autonomous and denaturalizing the family. He enables individuals to rid themselves of paternal dominion and even reverses the traditional relationship between family and State. Family and State are both essentially artificial, and the first is based on the second. From this point of view, what Hobbes presents is a dynamic state of nature, which makes it possible to answer the criticism of patriarchal thinkers and today’s feminists. Furthermore, the article reveals the significance of Hobbes’s theory of the family for the formation of modern individuals and their political life.

Keywords: family, State, paternal dominion, individual autonomy, Hobbes.

  1. -­ Abbott 1981: Philip Abbott, The Three Families of Thomas Hobbes, «The Review of Politics», 43(1981), pp. 242-­258.
  2. -­ Aristotle, Politics (translated by C.D.C. Reeve, Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis-­Cambridge 2017).
  3. -­ Bejan 2010: Teresa M. Bejan, Teaching the “Leviathan”: Thomas Hobbes on education, «Oxford Review of Education», 36 (2010), pp. 607-­626.
  4. -­ Bobbio 1993: Norberto Bobbio, Hobbes and the natural law tradition, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London 1993.
  5. -­ Bodin 1962: Jean Bodin, The Six Bookes of a Commonweale: A Facsimile Reprint of the English Translation of 1606, edited by K.D. McRae, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA and London 1962.
  6. -­ Bodin 2013: Jean Bodin, Les Six Livres de la République, Livre premier/De Republica libri sex, Liber I, edited by Mario Turchetti, Classiques Garnier, Paris 2013.
  7. -­ Boucher 2003: Joanne Boucher, Male Power and Contract Theory: Hobbes and Locke in Carole Pateman’s The Sexual Contract, «Canadian Journal of Political Science», 36 (2003), pp. 23-­38.
  8. -­ Chapman 1975: Richard Allen Chapman, Leviathan Writ Small: Thomas Hobbes on the Family, «The American Political Science Review», 69 (1975), pp. 76-­90.
  9. -­ Sir Robert Filmer, Patriarcha and Other Writings, edited by J.P. Sommerville, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1991.
  10. -­ Foisneau 1988: Luc Foisneau, De Machiavel à Hobbes: Efficacité et souveraineté dans la pensée politique moderne’, in Histoire de la philosophie Politique, 2: Naissances de la modernité, edited by A. Renault, Calmann-­Lévy, Paris 1999, pp. 203-­ 279.
  11. -­ Foucault 1997: Michel Foucault, «Il faut défendre la société». Cours au Collège de France. 1976, edited by F. Ewald and A. Fontana, EHESS Gallimard Seuil, Paris 1997.
  12. -­ Foucault 2014: Michel Foucault, Histoire de la sexualité I. La volonté de savoir, Gallimard, Paris 2014.
  13. -­ Franklin 2009: Julian Franklin, Jean Bodin and the Rise of Absolutist Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2009.
  14. -­ Furet 1997: François Furet, Rousseau and the French Revolution, in The Legacy of Rousseau, edited by C. Orwin and N. Tarcov, University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1997, pp. 168-­182.
  15. -­ Goyard-­Fabre 1989a: Simone Goyard-­Fabre, Jean Bodin et le droit de la République, PUF, Paris 1989.
  16. -­ Goyard-­Fabre 1989b: Simone Goyard-­Fabre, La législation civile dans l’État-­ Léviathan, in Thomas Hobbes, de la métaphysique à la politique, Actes du colloque franco-­américain de Nantes, edited by M.A. Bertman and M. Malherbe, Vrin, Paris 1989, pp. 173-­192.
  17. -­ Hamilton 2009: James J. Hamilton, Hobbes the royalist, Hobbes the republican, «History of Political Thought», 30 (2009), pp. 411-­454.
  18. -­ Hirschmann 2016: Nancy, J. Hirschmann, Hobbes on the Family, in The Oxford Handbook of Hobbes, edited by A.P. Martinich and K. Hoekstra, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2016, pp. 242-­263.
  19. -­ Thomas Hobbes, Elements of Law, in The English works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury Vol. IV (edited by W. Molesworth, London: John Bohn, 1840).
  20. -­ Thomas Hobbes, On the Citizen (edited by R. Tuck and M. Silverthorne, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
  21. -­ Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan (edited by E. Curley, Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing, 1994).
  22. -­ King 1999: Preston King, The Ideology of Order, Frank Cass, London 1999.
  23. -­ Koganzon 2015: Rita Koganzon, The Hostile Family and the Purpose of the “Natural Kingdom” in Hobbes’s Political Thought, «The Review of Politics», 77 (2015), pp. 377-­398.
  24. -­ Lee 2018: Daniel Lee, Popular Sovereignty in Early Modern Constitutional Thought, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2018.
  25. -­ Lessay 1988: Franck Lessay, Souveraineté et légitimité chez Hobbes, PUF, Paris 1988.
  26. -­ Levin, MacKay 2019: Jamie Levin, Joseph MacKay, Domestic entanglements: Family, state, hierarchy, and the Hobbesian state of nature, «Review of international Studies», 45 (2019), pp. 221-­238.
  27. -­ Li 2013: Meng Li, The State of Nature and the Family, «Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences)», 50 (2013), pp. 30.40.
  28. -­ Li 2015: Meng Li, The Natural Society, SDX Joint Publishing Company, Beijing 2015.
  29. -­ Lloyd 1991: Howell A. Lloyd, Sovereignty: Bodin, Hobbes, Rousseau, «Revue Internationale de Philosophie», 45 (1991), pp. 353-­379.
  30. -­ John Locke, Two Treatises of Government (London: C. Baldwin, 1824).
  31. -­ Macpherson 1965: Crawford Brough Macpherson, Hobbes’s bourgeois man, in
  32. Hobbes Studies, edited by K.C. Brown, Harvard University Press, 1965, pp. 169-­184).
  33. -­ Malcolm 2002: Noel Malcolm, Aspects of Hobbes, Clarendon Press, Oxford 2002.
  34. -­ Matheron 2011: Alexandre Matheron, Études sur Spinoza et les philosophies de l’âge classique, ENS Éditions, Lyon 2011.
  35. -­ Mesnard 1936: Pierre Mesnard, L’essor de la philosophie politique au XVIe siècle, Boivin, Paris 1936.
  36. -­ Pateman 1995: Carole Pateman, The Sexual Contract, Polity Press, Cambridge 1995.
  37. -­ Pennock 1965: J. Roland Pennock, Hobbes’s confusing “clarity” -­ The case of “liberty”, in Hobbes Studies, edited by K.C. Brown, Harvard University Press, 1965, pp. 101-­116.
  38. -­ Schochet 2012: Gordon J. Schochet, Thomas Hobbes on the Family and the State of Nature (1967), in Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes, edited by N.J. Hirschmann and J.H. Wright, The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2012, pp. 105-­ 124.
  39. -­ Skinner 2012: Quentin Skinner, Hobbes, History, Politics, and Gender: A Conversation with Carole Pateman and Quentin Skinner, in Feminist Interpretations of Thomas Hobbes, edited by N.J. Hirschmann and J.H. Wright, The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2012, pp. 18-­46.
  40. -­ Skinner 2013: Quentin Skinner, Préface, in Les Six Livres de la République/De Republica libri sex. Livre premier -­ Liber I, edited by M. Turchetti, Classiques Garnier, Paris 2013, pp. 25-­30.
  41. -­ Spitz 1988: Jean-­Fabien Spitz, Bodin et la souveraineté, PFU, Paris 1988.
  42. -­ Sreedhar 2012: Susanne Sreedhar, Hobbes on “The Woman Question”, «Philosophy Compass», 7 (2012), pp. 772-­781.
  43. -­ Strauss 1965: Leo Strauss, On the spirit of Hobbes’s political philosophy, in Hobbes Studies, edited by K.C. Brown, Harvard University Press, 1965, pp. 1-­30).
  44. -­ Strauss 1963: Leo Strauss, The Political Philosophy of Hobbes, translated by E. Sinclair, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London 1963.
  45. -­ Suppa 1998: Silvio Suppa, La théorie de la souveraineté dans le devenir de la raison. Réflexions sur Machiavel et Bodin, in Politique, droit et théologie chez Bodin, Grotius et Hobbes, edited by L. Foisneau, Éditions KIMÉ, Paris 1998, pp. 27-­46.
  46. -­ Thomas 1965: Keith Thomas, The social origins of Hobbes’s political thought, in Hobbes Studies, edited by K.C. Brown, Harvard University Press, 1965, pp. 185-­236.
  47. -­ Tricaud 1990: François Tricaud, Les lois de nature, in Thomas Hobbes: Philosophie première, théorie de la science et politique, edited by Y.C. Zarka and J. Bernhardt, PUF, Paris 1990, pp. 265-­273.
  48. -­ Zarka 2000: Yves Charles Zarka, La décision métaphysique de Hobbes: Condition de la politique, Vrin, Paris 2000.
  49. -­ Zarka 2012a: Yves Charles Zarka, Puissance et liberté: de la métaphysique à la politique chez Hobbes, in Liberté et nécessité chez Hobbes et ses contemporains, edited by Yves Charles Zarka, Vrin, Paris 2012, pp. 7-­24.
  50. -­ Zarka 2012b: Yves Charles Zarka, Hobbes et la pensée politique moderne, PUF, Paris 2012.

Liang Pang, Family Between the Individual and Political Society. A Study On Hobbes’s Theory of the Family in "RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA" 4/2023, pp 560-579, DOI: 10.3280/SF2023-004003