Titolo Rivista FINANCIAL REPORTING
Autori/Curatori Anna Alexander, Luca Menicacci
Anno di pubblicazione 2025 Fascicolo 2025/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 32 P. 27-58 Dimensione file 260 KB
DOI 10.3280/fr202519852
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più
clicca qui
Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.
Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF
FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche
Purpose: This study examines the impact of Italy’s 2008 interest barrier reform, which capped financing cost deductions at 30% of adjusted Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA), on the capital structure and tax strategies of private firms. It focuses on the differential effects across firm sizes, particularly small firms. Design/Methodology/Approach: Using a difference-in-difference design, the study compares private firms above and below the 30% EBITDA threshold. The analysis em-ploys robust matching techniques, such as the entropy balance method, to ensure com-parability between treatment and control groups and minimize selection bias. Findings: The reform reduced leverage in medium and larger firms, primarily through adjustments in long-term debt. However, smaller firms, constrained by financial inflexi-bility, increased their reliance on short-term liabilities. Furthermore, medium and larger firms maintained stable effective tax rates (ETR), while smaller firms experienced an increase. Originality: This study contributes to the limited research on private firms’ tax sensitiv-ity, particularly highlighting the structural disadvantages faced by smaller firms. It pro-vides novel evidence on how firm size influences responses to tax policy changes, ad-dressing a critical gap in the literature dominated by studies on public firms. Practical Implications: Policymakers should consider the unequal effects of tax reforms on firms of different sizes. Targeted measures could alleviate the disproportionate bur-dens on smaller firms, supporting their financial stability and competitiveness.
Parole chiave:capital structure, financial policy, tax avoidance, tax planning, debt tax shield
Jel codes:G32, H25, H26, M41, M48
Anna Alexander, Luca Menicacci, Leveraging the tax shield: Capital structure decisions in privately-held firms in "FINANCIAL REPORTING" 2/2025, pp 27-58, DOI: 10.3280/fr202519852