Understanding small enterprises. Praise of diversity in a global perspectives

Journal title SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO
Author/s Ida Regalia
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/147 Language Italian
Pages 18 P. 41-58 File size 124 KB
DOI 10.3280/SL2017-147003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The article draws attention to the widespread erroneous tendency to consider small enterprises as both a homogeneous and substantially closed world. After having explored strengths and limits, complexity and heterogeneity of this large part of the economy, the author focuses on the specific ways in which labour is here regulated. In particular, through the combination of two dimensions - the representation of labour and the degree of workplace welfare - four different patterns of employment relations are identified, thus going beyond the traditional opposite visions of small enterprises as the domain of managerial autocracy or else of harmonious employment relations. In the end, what is at stake today in the field of work more in general the need for a new imagination of the ways in which labour can be represented and protected.

Il saggio evidenzia come spesso si tenda erroneamente a considerare le piccole imprese un mondo omogeneo e sostanzialmente chiuso. Dopo una breve riflessione sui punti di forza e i limiti, gli elementi di complessità e di eterogeneità di questa larga parte dell’economia, l’autore sposta l’attenzione sulle specificità dei modi in cui viene regolato il lavoro al loro interno. In particolare, combinando presenza/assenza di rappresentanza del lavoro e grado di benessere lavorativo dei lavoratori, vengono individuati quattro diversi modelli di relazioni d’impiego, smentendo così le ipotesi sia di una netta prevalenza di modi di gestione unilaterale dell’impresa con condizioni insoddisfacenti per il lavoro, sia quella opposta del prevalere di situazioni armoniose e elevato benessere per i lavoratori. In definitiva, ciò che è in gioco oggi nel campo del lavoro più in generale è la necessità di immaginare nuovi modi di rappresentanza e tutela.

Keywords: Small enterprises, regulation, representation, workplace welfare

  1. Bagnasco A. (1977). Tre Italie. La problematica territoriale dello sviluppo italiano. Bologna: il Mulino.
  2. Bagnasco A. (1978). La costruzione sociale del mercato. Bologna: il Mulino.
  3. Barrett R., Rainnie A. (2002). What’s So Special About Small Firms? Developing an Integrated Approach to Analysing Small Firm Industrial Relations. Work, employment and society, 16, 3: 415-431. DOI: 10.1177/095001702762217416
  4. Becattini G. (1987). Mercato e forze locali: il distretto industriale, Bologna: il Mulino.
  5. Becattini G. (2000). Dal distretto industriale allo sviluppo locale. Milano: Bollati Boringhieri.
  6. Bolton J.E. (1971). Small Firms: Report of the Committee of Inquiry on Small Firms. Bolton Report Cmnd. London: HMSO.
  7. Bottazzi G. (2010). Torn Between Breaks and Continuity: Small Enterprises and Italian Development Patterns. In: The development of SME: policies, actors and problems. A comparison between Japan, Italy and Argentina. Rome: Università di Roma La Sapienza: 133-148.
  8. Brusco S. (1994). Sistemi globali e sistemi locali. Economia e Politica Industriale, n. 84: 63-75.
  9. Burrows R., Curran J. (1989). Sociological research on service sector small businesses: some conceptual considerations. Work, Employment and Society, 3(4): 527-39.
  10. Ciciotti E. (1993). Competitività e territorio. L’economia regionale nei Paesi industrializzati. Roma: La Nuova Italia Scientifica.
  11. Curran J. (2006). ‘Specificity’ and ‘denaturing’ the small business. International Small Business Journal, 24(2): 205-210. DOI: 10.1177/0266242605054049
  12. De Kok J., Deijl C., Veldhuis-Van-Essen C. (2013). Is Small Still Beautiful? Published by GIZ on behalf of German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development and ILO. Eschborn: GIZ.
  13. Duarte N. (2004). The role of SMEs for development: A literature review, Paper submitted to ERSA 2004 Congress. Porto: Instituto Politécnico do Porto.
  14. Edwards P. (2012). Employment Rights in Small Firms. In: Dickens L., ed., Making Employment Rights Effective: Issues of Enforcement and Compliance. Oxford: Hart Publishing: 139-58.
  15. Fondazione Impresa (2014). Analisi dell’occupazione nelle imprese dell’industria e dei servizi (2001-2011). Venezia. --Url: www.fondazioneimpresa.it/archives/category/studi-e-ricerche/piccola-impresa-pubblicazioni/page/5.
  16. Garofoli G. (1994). Modelli locali di sviluppo. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  17. Gereffi G., Humphrey J., Sturgeon T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1): 78-104. DOI: 10.1080/09692290500049805
  18. Gilbert B.A., McDougall P.P., Audretsch D.B. (2006). New Venture Growth; A Review and Extension. Journal of Management, 32: 926-945. DOI: 10.1177/0149206306293860
  19. Goss D. (1991). Small Business and Society. London: Routledge.
  20. Haltiwanger J., Scarpetta S., Schwiger H. (2010). Cross country differences in job reallocation: The role of industry, firm size and regulations. EBRD Working Paper 116. UK: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
  21. ILO (2015). Small and medium-sized enterprises and decent and productive employment creation. Report IV, International Labour Conference, 104th Session, 2015. Geneva: International Labour Office.
  22. Inforegio (2000). Documents – Official Texts. Sixth periodic report on the social and economic situation and development of regions in the European Union. --Url: www.inforegio.org/wbdoc/docoffic/official/radi/page68%5Fen.htm.
  23. Ingham G.K. (1970). Size of Industrial Organisation and Worker Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Jack S., Hyman J., Osborne F. (2006). Small entrepreneurial ventures culture, change and the impact on HRM: A critical review. Human Resource Management Review, vol. 16: 456-466.
  25. Mallett O., Wapshott R. (2017). Small business revivalism: employment relations in small and medium-sized enterprises. Work, employment and society, 1-8. DOI: 10.1177/0950017017690503
  26. Neumark D., Wall B., Zhang J. (2011). Do small businesses create more jobs? New evidence for the United States from the National Establishment Time Series. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1): 16-29.
  27. Piore M.J., Sabel C.F. (1984). The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books.
  28. Pissarides F. (1999). Is lack of funds the main obstacle to growth? EBRD’s experience with small and medium-sized businesses in central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Business Venturing, 14: 519-539. DOI: 10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00027-5
  29. Porter M.E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. London: Macmillan Press.
  30. Rainnie A. (1989). Industrial Relations in Small Firms: Small Isn’t Beautiful. London: Routledge.
  31. Rainnie A. (1991). Small firms: between the enterprise culture and ‘New Times’. In: Burrows R., ed., Deciphering the Enterprise Culture. Abingdon: Routledge: 176-99.
  32. Ram M. (1994). Managing to Survive: Working Lives in Small Firms. Oxford: Blackwell.
  33. Regalia I. (2017a). Labour regulation in small firms: In search of a more comprehensive employment/industrial relations paradigm. Employee Relations, 39(3): 335-350. DOI: 10.1108/ER-08-2016-0159
  34. Regalia I. (2017b). Beyond workplaces and industries: possibilities for organized action at the territorial level. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 38 (2): 233-256.
  35. Renda A., Luchetta G. (2010). L’Europa e le Piccole e Medie Imprese: come rilanciare la sfida della competitività. Roma: Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Dipartimento Politiche Europee.
  36. Sabel C.F. (2009). Is the Small Firm Still a Category of Analysis? In: Lundström A., ed., The Role of SMEs and Entrepreneurship in a Globalised Economy, Expert report No. 34. Stockholm: The Globalisation Council.
  37. Schumacher F. (1973). Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered. London: Abacus.
  38. Stame N. (1999). Small and medium enterprise aid programs: intangible effects and evaluation practice. Evaluation and Program Planning, 22, 1: 105-111. DOI: 10.1016/S0149-7189(98)00046-9
  39. Van Osnabrugge M., Robinson R. (2000). A comparison of business angel and venture capitalist investment procedures: an agency theory-based analysis. Venture Capital, 2(2): 91-109. DOI: 10.1080/136910600295729
  40. Trigilia C. (2005). Sviluppo locale: Un progetto per l’Italia. Roma: Laterza.
  41. Trigilia C., Dei Ottati G., Burroni L., a cura di (2008). Innovazione nella continuità. Meccanismi di cambiamento nelle aree distrettuali tradizionalmente forti dell’economia toscana. Pisa: Edizioni Plus - Pisa University Press.
  42. Wever K.S. (1998). International labor revitalization: enlarging the playing field. Industrial Relations, 37, 3: 388-407. DOI: 10.1111/0019-8676.00093
  43. Zeitlin J. (2008). Industrial Districts and Regional Clusters. In: Jones G., Zeitlin J., eds., Oxford handbook of business history. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 219-243.

Ida Regalia, Comprendere le piccole imprese. Elogio delle diversità in uno sguardo globale in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 147/2017, pp 41-58, DOI: 10.3280/SL2017-147003