Strategic competencies and university teaching: A path of self-regulation and assessment of learning in study and work

Journal title EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY
Author/s Claudio Pignalberi
Publishing Year 2021 Issue 2021/2
Language Italian Pages 14 P. 397-410 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/ess2-2021oa12416
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

View article Download Open Access article

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The paper proposes a reading of university teaching as a learning environment that facilitates the development and cultivation of strategic competencies, with particular attention to self-regulatory competencies. In the first part, the paper provides some reflections on the theme of evaluation and then illustrates some effective approaches/tools for the management of the teaching process. The second part illustrates, instead, the results of a laboratory of self-assessment of strategic skills conducted within a university Master’s degree in management of training processes and human resources.

Keywords: ; Self-regulation; strategic skills; adult education; academic success; assessment

  1. Alessandrini G. (2016). Nuovo Manuale per l’esperto dei processi formativi. Roma: Carocci.
  2. Baldacci M. (2019). La scuola al bivio. Mercato o democrazia?. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  3. Bardach L. and Klassen R.M. (2020). Smart teachers, successful students? A systematic review of the literature on teachers’ cognitive abilities and teacher effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 30: 1110-1135, DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100312
  4. Calvani A., a cura di (2015). Rete, comunità e conoscenza: costruire e gestire dina-miche collaborative. Trento: Erickson.
  5. Castoldi M. (2019). Rubriche valutative. Guidare l’espressione del giudizio. Milano: UTET.
  6. Dewey J. (1916). Democracy and education. An introduction to the philosophy of education. Massachusetts: The Macmillan Company.
  7. Ellerani P.G. (2017). Costruire l’ambiente di apprendimento. Prospettive di cooperative learning, service learning e problem-based learning. Teramo: Lisciani.
  8. Ellerani P.G. (2020). Capability ecosystem: l’ecosistema per l’innovazione e la formazione. Dal co-working al contesto di capacitazione. Roma: Armando.
  9. Engeström Y. (2016). Studies in Expansive Learning. Learning What Is Not Yet There. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. European Commission (2018). Raccomandazione del Consiglio del 22 maggio 2018 relativa alle competenze chiave per l’apprendimento permanente. Bruxelles.
  11. Harley J.M., Mantou Lou N., Liu Y., Cutumisu M., Daniels L.M., Leighton J.P. and Nadon L. (2020). University students’ negative emotions in a computer-based examination: the roles of trait test-emotion, prior test-taking methods and gender. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(6): 956-972, DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1836123
  12. Le Boterf G. (1994). De la compétence. Essai sur un attracteur étrange. Paris: Les éditions d’organisation.
  13. Lillejord S. and Børte K. (2020).Trapped between accountability and professional learning? School leaders and teacher evaluation. Professional Development in Education, 46(2): 274-291, DOI: 10.1080/19415257.2019.1585384
  14. Margiotta U. (2018). La formazione dei talenti. Tutti i bambini sono un dono, il talento non è un dono. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  15. Mehrabi Boshrabadi A. and Reza Hosseini M. (2020). Designing collaborative problem solving assessment tasks in engineering: an evaluative judgement perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(6): 913-927, DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1836122
  16. Mezirow J. (2003). Apprendimento e trasformazione. Il significato dell’esperienza e il valore della riflessione nell’apprendimento degli adulti. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  17. Moon J.A. (2004). Esperienza, riflessione, apprendimento. Manuale per una forma-zione innovativa. Roma: Carocci.
  18. Nigris E., Balconi B. e Zecca L. (2019). Dalla progettazione alla valutazione didattica. Progettare, documentare, monitorare. Milano: Pearson.
  19. Nussbaum M.C. (2012). Creare capacità. Liberarsi dalla dittatura del Pil. Bologna: il Mulino.
  20. Pellerey M. (2018). Soft skill e orientamento professionale. Roma: CNOS-FAP.
  21. Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri (2021). Piano Nazionale di Ripresa e Resilienza. #NextGenerationItalia. Roma.
  22. Rossi P.G. (2017). L’agire didattico. Manuale per l’insegnante. Brescia: La Scuola.
  23. Savickas M.L. (2014). Career counseling. Guida teorica e metodologica per il XXI secolo. Trento: Erickson.
  24. Sen A.K. (2000). Lo sviluppo è libertà. Perché non c’è crescita senza democrazia. Milano: Mondadori.
  25. Stančić M. (2020). Peer assessment as a learning and self-assessment tool: a look inside the black box. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(6): 852-864, DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2020.1828267
  26. Stronge J.H. and Tucker P.D. (2020). Handbook on Teacher Evaluation. Assessing and Improving Performance. New York: Routledge.
  27. Wenger E. (2006). Comunità di pratica. Apprendimento, Significato e Identità. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  28. Zimmerman B.J. and Schunk D.H. (2011). Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. Oxon (NY): Routledge.

Claudio Pignalberi, Competenze strategiche e didattica universitaria: un percorso di autoregolazione e valutazione dell’apprendimento nello studio e nel lavoro in "EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY" 2/2021, pp 397-410, DOI: 10.3280/ess2-2021oa12416