Communication and citizen engagement. EU’s social network experience

Author/s Vittoria Marino, Letizia Lo Presti
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2015/3
Language Italian Pages 18 P. 85-102 File size 565 KB
DOI 10.3280/MC2015-003005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The research investigates the European Institutions communication on Twitter to highlight which forms of communication have a strong impact onto citizen engagement. Moreover through a deep literature review, this study offers a significant theoretical contribution to the analysis of the role of social media in enforcing the policies of European citizen engagement. Based on content analysis of European Commission’s tweets, the paper provides managerial insights to improve the institu tional communication strategies that could increase the engagement. The analysis of the communication categories permits to understand what better stimulates the citizen’s participation.

Keywords: Citizen engagement, social network, european institution, public communication 2.0

  1. Agostino D. (2013). Using social media to engage citizens: A study of Italian municipalities. Public Relations Review, 39(3): 232-234, DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.02.009
  2. BasoloV., Yerena A. (2014). The use of social media for citizen engagement: the case of SAPAS in la paz, Mexico. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. ACM, 2014: 192-195.
  3. Bovaird T. (2007). Beyong Engagement and participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services. Public administration review, 67(5): 846-859, DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
  4. Boyd D., Golder S., Lotan G. (2010). Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter. In: System Sciences (HICSS), 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on. IEEE 2010: 1-10, DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2010.412
  5. Boyd D. (2008). Can social networking sites enable political action?. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 4 (2): 241-244.
  6. Carpini M.D., Cook F.L., Jacobs L.R. (2004). Public Deliberations, Discursive Participation and Citizen Engagement: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci., 7: 315-44, DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630
  7. Cho M., Schweickart T., Haase A. (2014). Public engagement with nonprofit organizations on Facebook. Public Relations Review, 40(3): 565-567, DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.01.008
  8. Cogburn D.L., Espinoza-Vasquez F.K. (2011). From networked nominee to networked nation: Examining the impact of Web 2.0 and social media on political participation and civic engagement in the 2008 Obama campaign. Journal of Political Marketing, 10(1-2): 189-213, DOI: 10.1080/15377857.2011.540224
  9. Clavio G. (2008). Uses and gratifications of Internet collegiate sport message board users. Indiana University, ProQuest. Testo disponibile sul sito http://pqdtopen.proquest. com/ (ultimo accesso 24/03/2014).
  10. Commissione Europea (2007a). Communicating about Europe via the Internet – Engaging
  11. the citizens, SEC (2007) 1742. Testo disponibile al sito: (ultimo accesso 21/03/2014).
  12. Commissione Europea (2007b). Comunicare l’Europa insieme, COM (2007) 568.
  13. Commissione Europea (2006). Libro bianco su una politica europea di comunicazione,
  14. COM (2006) 35.
  15. Commissione Europea (2005). Il contributo della Commissione al periodo di riflessione e oltre: Un Piano D per la democrazia, il dialogo e il dibattito, COM(2005) 494.
  16. Cornwall A. (2008). Democratizing engagement. What the UK can learn from international experience. Londra: Demos.
  17. Dalakiouridou E., Tambouris E., Tarabanis K. (2012). ePartecipation and online social networks: The case of the European Institutions. European Journal of ePractice, 16: 94-107 .
  18. Gambetti R.C., Graffigna G. (2011). Consumer Brand Engagement: lo stato dell’arte. Teoria, applicazioni, prospettive di ricerca. Micro & Macro Marketing, 2011, 20(2): 199-226. Golbeck J., Grimes, J.M., Rogers, A. (2010), Twitter use by the U.S. Congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology, 61(8): 1612-1621, DOI: 10.1002/asi.21344
  19. Hambrick M.E., Simmons J.M., Greenhalgh G.P., Greenwell T.C. (2010). Understanding Professional Athletes’. Use of Twitter: A content Analysis of Athlete Tweets. International Journal of Sport Communication, 3 (4): 454-471.
  20. Kent M.L. (2013), Using social media dialogically: Public relations role in reviving democracy. Public Relations Review, 39(4): 337-345, DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.07.024
  21. Lukasik L. (2003). Theoretical Understanding of Citizen Engagement. Hamilton Community Foundation, Testo disponibile al sito: (ultimo accesso 30/03/2014).
  22. Lutz C., Hoffmann C.P., Meckel M. (2014). Beyond just politics: A systematic literature review of online participation. First Monday, 19(1).
  23. Macintosh A., Smith E. (2002), Citizen participation in Public Affairs. In: Electronic Government., 2456: 256-263, Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-46138-8-41
  24. McClung S.D. (2003). Social Networks and Political Partecipation: The role of Social Interaction in Explaining Political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 56(4):449-64, DOI: 10.1177/106591290305600407
  25. Michailidou A. (2008). Democracy and New Media in the European Union: Communication or Partecipation Deficit? Journal of Contemporary European Research, 4 (4): 346-368 .
  26. Naaman M., Boase J., Lai C. (2010). Is it really about me?: message content in social awareness streams. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 2010. p. 189-192, DOI: 10.1145/1718918.1718953
  27. OECD (2011). Regional chapter – Citizen engagement to enhance accountability and prevent corruption in the provision of public services in OECD countries. A cura di Beatriz Sanz Corella; testo disponibile al sito 7621.pdf (ultimo accesso 20/03/2014).
  28. OECD (2001). Citizen as partners. Information, consultation and public participation in policy-making, OECD publications, Francia.
  29. Panagiotopoulos P., Sams S. (2012). An Overview study of Twitter in the UK Local Governament. In: Proceedings of TGov 2012 Conf. London: Brunel University.
  30. Reddel T., Woolcock G. (2004). From consultation to participatory governance? A critical review of citizen engagement strategies in Queensland. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 63(3): 75-87, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.2004.00392.x
  31. Sæøbø Ø. (2011). Understanding twitterTM use among parliament representatives: A genre analysis. In: Electronic participation. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 1-12.
  32. Sæøbø Ø., Rose J. & Nyvang T. (2009). The Role of Social Networking Services in eParticipation, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Electronic Participation, Eds. A. Macintosh & E. Tambouris, Springer-Verlag, 46-55 .
  33. Smith S., Dalakioridou E. (2009). Contextualising public (e)Participation in the governance of the European Union. European Journal of ePractice, 7: 4-14. Stieglitz S., Dang-Xuan L. Political communication and influence through microblogging—an empirical analysis of sentiment in twitter messages and retweet behavior.
  34. In: System Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on. IEEE, 2012. p. 3500-3509, DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2012.476
  35. Suh B., Lichan H., Pirolli P., Chi E.H. (2010). Want to be Retweetes? Large Scale Anlytics on Factors Impacting Retweet in Twitter Network. In: Social computing (socialcom), 2010, ieee second international conference on. IEEE, 177-184, DOI: 10.1109/SocialCom.2010.33
  36. Tambouris E., Macintoch A., Dalakiouridou E., Smith S., Panopoulou E., Tarabanis
  37. K., Millard J. (2013). ePartecipation in Europe: Current State and Practical Reccommendations. In J.R. Gil-Garcia (Ed.): E-Government Success Around the World: Cases, Empirical Studies, and Practical Recommendations, IGI Global, USA, DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4173-0.ch01
  38. Theiss-Morse E., Hibbing R.J. (2005). Citizenship and Civic Engagement. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci., 8 (1): 227-249, DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104829
  39. Vesnic-Alujevic L. (2012). Political participation and web 2.0 in Europe: A case study of Facebook. Public Relations Review, 38(3): 466-470, DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.01.010
  40. Warren A.M., Sulaiman A., Ismawati Jaafar N., (2014). Social media effects on fostering online civic engagement and bulding citizen trust and trust in institutions. Government Information Quarterly, 31: 291-301, DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.11.007
  41. Waters R., Williams J.M. (2011). Squawking, tweeting, cooing, and hooting: analyzing the communication patterns of government agencies on Twitter. Journal of Public Affair, 11 (4): 353-363, DOI: 10.1002/pa.385
  42. Waters R., Burnett E., Lamm A., Lucas J. (2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: how nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review, 35 (2): 102-106, DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.01.006
  43. Wigard F., Diannie L. (2010). Twitter in government: Building relationships one tweet at a time. In: Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG), Seventh International Conference on. IEEE, 2010: 563-567, DOI: 10.1109/ITNG.2010.171

Vittoria Marino, Letizia Lo Presti, Comunicazione e citizen engagement. L’esperienza dell’Unione Europea attraverso i social network in "MERCATI E COMPETITIVITÀ" 3/2015, pp 85-102, DOI: 10.3280/MC2015-003005