Building trust in the web 2.0. The case of online frauds

Author/s Simone Carlo, Silvia De Simone, Elisabetta Locatelli, Nicoletta Vittadini
Publishing Year 2016 Issue 2016/51 Language Italian
Pages 19 P. 64-82 File size 224 KB
DOI 10.3280/SC2016-051005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The digital transformation led by internet and social media changed both the rules of trusting and also the way they are applied within social relationships and e-commerce exchanges. The article presents the empirical analysis of self-help websites that help people who were scammed. The descriptions of how trust were obtained and then betrayed by fraudsters show the building process of trust and its mechanisms. Research results show that expertise and friendliness were crucial in this process, but also the use of online platforms well known by users.

Keywords: Performance, trust, fraud, e-commerce, identity, performance, self-help.

  1. Artz D., Gil Y. (2007), A survey of trust in computer science and the Semantic Web, «Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web», Vol. 5, Issue 2, pp. 58-71.
  2. Blau P.M. (1964), Exchange and power in social life, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  3. Clusit (2015), Rapporto Clusit 2016 sulla sicurezza ICT in Italia,
  4. Coleman J.S. (1990), Foundations of social theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  5. Das R., Pavlìčová T. (2013), Is there an author behind this text? A literary aesthetic driven approach to interactive media, in «New Media & Society», Vol. 16, n. 3, pp. 381-397. DOI: 10.1177/1461444813481296
  6. Garfinkel H. (1967), Studies in ethnomethodology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  7. Giddens A. (1990), The consequences of modernity, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
  8. Gili G., Colombo F. (2012), Comunicazione, cultura, società, La Scuola, Brescia.
  9. Glaser B.G., Strauss A.L. (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine Pub. Co., Chicago; trad. it. (2009), La scoperta della grounded theory: strategie per la ricerca qualitativa, Armando, Roma.
  10. Goffman E. (1959), The presentation of self in everyday life, Random House, New York; trad. it. (1969), La vita quotidiana come rappresentazione, il Mulino, Bologna.
  11. Grabner-Kräuter S. (2009), Web 2.0 social networks: The Role of Trust, in «Journal of Business Ethics», Vol. 90, Supplement 4, pp. 505-522.
  12. Grandison T., Sloman M. (2000), A survey of trust in internet applications, in «IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials», Vol. 4, n. 4, pp. 2-16.
  13. Holzner B., Robertson R. (1980), Identity and authority. A problem analysis of processes of identification and authorization, in R. Robertson, B. Holzner (eds.), Identity and authority, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 1-39.
  14. Luhmann N. (1979), Trust and power, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  15. McKnight D.M., Chervany M.L. (1996), The meanings of trust, Technical Report 94-04, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota.
  16. Mcpherson M., Lovin L.S., Cook J.M. (2001), Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks, in «Ann. Rev. Sociol.», Vol. 27, n. 1, pp. 415-444.
  17. Mui L.M., Mohtashemi A., Halberstadt A. (2002), Computational model of trust and reputation for E-businesses. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on System Science, pp. 280-287.
  18. Netcomm (2015), Netcomm e-commerce Forum, URL: (2010), Online trust and privacy: People’s attitude and behaviour, disponibile online
  19. Parsons T. (1969), Politics and social structure, Macmillan-The Free Press, New York; trad. it. (1975), Sistema politico e struttura sociale, Giuffrè, Milano.
  20. Pavlìčová T. (2013), Trust in the author: Identity, expertise and reputation, CM: Communication Management Quarterly: Časopis za upravljanje komuniciranjem, 26, pp. 33-50.
  21. Potts H.W.W. (2005), Online support groups: an overlooked resource for patients, in «He@lth Information on the Internet», Vol. 44, n. 1, pp. 6-8.
  22. Rotter J.B. (1971), Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust, in «American psychologist», XXVI, pp. 443-452.
  23. Rousseau D.M., Sim B., Bitkin R., Burt S., Colin C. (1998), Not So Different After All: A Cross- Discipline View of Trust, in «Academy of Management Review», Vol. 23, n. 3, pp. 393-404. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.1998.926617
  24. Sherchan W., Nepal S., Paris C. (2013), A Survey of trust in social networks, in «ACM Comput. Surv.», Vol. 45, n. 4, Article 47 (August), 33 pages.
  25. Simmel G. (1908), Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung, Leipzig; trad. it. (1989), Sociologia, Edizioni di Comunità, Milano.
  26. VanderZee K., Vosand M., Luijters K. (2009), Social Identity Patterns and Trust in Demographically Diverse Work Teams’, «SocialScience Information», Vol. 48, n. 2, pp. 175-198.

Simone Carlo, Silvia De Simone, Elisabetta Locatelli, Nicoletta Vittadini, La costruzione della fiducia nel web 2.0. Il caso delle truffe online in "SOCIOLOGIA DELLA COMUNICAZIONE " 51/2016, pp 64-82, DOI: 10.3280/SC2016-051005