Clicca qui per scaricare

Spazi urbani e diritto alla città
Titolo Rivista: CRIOS 
Autori/Curatori: Stefano Moroni, Francesco Chiodelli 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2017 Fascicolo: 13  Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  14 P. 31-44 Dimensione file:  1217 KB
DOI:  10.3280/CRIOS2017-013003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 





  1. Agenzia del territorio. (2011). Gli immobili in Italia --(www.agenziaterritorio.it).
  2. Alfasi N., Portugali J. (2007). Planning Rules for a Self-Planned City. Planning Theory, 6(2), 164-182.
  3. Amin A. (2008). Collective culture and urban public space. City, 12(1), 5-24.
  4. Amin A., & Thrift N. (2001). Cities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  5. Arendt H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
  6. Aristotle. Nicomachean etichs. Cambridge: Harvard University Press (1934).
  7. Aristotle. Politics. Harmondsworth: Penguin (1981).
  8. Attoh K. A. (2011). What kind of right is the right to the city? Progress in Human Geography, 35(5), 669-685.
  9. Banca d’Italia. (2011). La ricchezza delle famiglie italiane, anno 2010. --(www.bancaditalia.it).
  10. Banerjee T. (2001). The Future of Public Space: Beyond Invented Streets and Reinvented Places. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(1), 9-24.
  11. Barnett R.E. (1998). The Structure of Liberty. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  12. Basta C. (2016). On Marx’s human significance, Harvey’s right to the city, and Nussbaum’s capability approach. Planning Theory (OnLineFirst)., DOI: 10.1177/1473095216641153
  13. Belli A. (2014). Spazio, differenza e ospitalità. La città oltre Henri Lefebvre. Roma: Carocci.
  14. Bobbio N. (1994). Il futuro della democrazia. Torino: Einaudi.
  15. Brundidge J. (2010). Encountering ‘difference’ in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 680-700.
  16. Buchanan A. (2005). Equality and human rights. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 4(1), 69-90.
  17. Carmona M. (2010). Contemporary public space, Part two: Classification. Journal of Urban Design, 15(2), 157-173.
  18. Carmona M., Tiesdell S., Heath T., & Ov T. (2010). Public places. Urban spaces. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  19. Chiodelli F. (2009). La cittadinanza secondo Henri Lefebvre: urbana, attiva, a matrice spaziale. Territorio, 51, 103-109.
  20. Chiodelli F. (2010). Enclaves private a carattere residenziale: il caso del co-housing. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 51(1), 95-116.
  21. Chiodelli F., Moroni S. (2013). Città, spazi pubblici e pluralismo: una discussione critica delle ordinanze comunali. Quaderni di scienza politica, 7(1), 125-144.
  22. Chiodelli F., Moroni S. (2014a). Typologies of spaces and topology of tolerance. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(2), 167-181.
  23. Chiodelli F., Moroni S. (2014b). Il problema del pluralismo negli spazi privati: attriti tra diritti fondamentali. Territorio, 67, 107-114.
  24. Cicalò E. (2010). Spazi pubblici. Progettare la dimensione pubblica della città contemporanea. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  25. Currie D.P. (1986). Positive and negative constitu-tional rights. The University of Chicago Law Review, 53, 864-890.
  26. Dikec M. (2005). (In)Justice and the ‘right to the city’. In: Wastl-Walter D., Staeheli L., & Dowler L. (a cura di). Rights to the City. Roma: Società Geografica Italiana.
  27. Di Masso A. (2012). Grounding citizenship: Toward a political psychology of public space. Political Psychology, 33(1), 123-143.
  28. Ellickson R.C. (1993). Property in land. Yale Law Journal, 102, 1315-1400.
  29. Ferraro G. (1990). La città nell’incertezza e la retorica del piano. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  30. Finnegan A.C., Saltsman A.P., White S.K. (2010). Negotiating politics and culture: The utility of human rights for activist organizing in the United States. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2(3), 307-333.
  31. Florida R. (2008). Who’s your city? New York: Basic Books.
  32. Freeden M. (1991). Rights. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  33. Glaeser R. (2011). Triumph of the city. London: Macmillan.
  34. Hayek F. A. (1982). Law, legislation and liberty. London: Routledge.
  35. Hirschl R. (2000). ‘Negative’ rights vs. ‘positive’ entitlements. Human Rights Quarterly, 22, 1060-1098.
  36. Höffe O. (1987). Politische Gerechtigkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
  37. Holcombe R. G. (2012). Planning and the invisible hand: Allies or adversaries? Planning Theory, 12(2), 199-210.
  38. Isin E. F. (2008). The city as the site of the social. In: Isin E. F. (a cura di). Recasting the social in citizenship. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  39. Jabareen Y. (2014). The right to the city’ revisited: Assessing urban rights – The case of Arab cities in Israel. Habitat International, 41, 135-141.
  40. Jun N. (2012). Contribution of Internet news use to reducing the influence of selective online exposure on political diversity. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1450-1457.
  41. Kirby A. (2008). The production of private space and its implications for urban social relations. Political Geography, 27(1), 74-95.
  42. Kohn M. (2013). Privatization and protest: Occupy Wall Street, occupy Toronto, and the occupation of public space in a democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 11(1), 99-110.
  43. Kukathas C. (1990). Hayek and modern liberalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  44. Lefebvre H. (1967). Vers le cybernanthrope: contre les technocrates. Paris: Denoël-Gonthier.
  45. Lefebvre H. (1968a). Le droit à la ville. Paris: Anthropos.
  46. Lefebvre H. (1968b). La vie quotidienne dans le monde modern. Paris: Gallimard.
  47. Lefebvre H. (1972). Espace et politique. Le droit à la ville II. Paris: Anthropos.
  48. Leoni B. (2007). Collettivismo e libertà economica. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
  49. Lopez de Souza M. (2010). Which right to which city? In defence of political-strategic clarity. Interface, 2(1), 315-333.
  50. Madanipour A. (2009). Public and private spaces of the city. London: Routledge.
  51. Madanipour A. (Ed.). (2010a). Whose Public Space? London: Routledge.
  52. Madanipour A. (2010b). Introduction. In: Madanipour A. (Ed.). Whose Public Space?. Lon-don: Routledge.
  53. Marcuse P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City, 13(2-3), 185-197.
  54. Mitchell D. (1995). The end of public Space? Peo-ple’s park, definitions of the public, and democracy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 85 (1), 108-133.
  55. Mitchell D. (2003). The right to the city. New York: The Guilford Press.
  56. Mitchell D. (2005). The S.U.V. model of citizenship: floating bubbles, buffer zones, and the rise of the “purely atomistic” individual. Political Geography, 24(1), 77-100.
  57. Moroni S. (2010). Rethinking the theory and practice of land-use regulation. Towards nomocracy. Planning Theory, 9(2), 137-155.
  58. Moroni S. (2012). Why nomocracy: Structural ignorance, radical pluralism and the role of relational rules. Progress in Planning, 77(2), 46-59.
  59. Moroni S. (2014). Towards a general theory of contractual communities. In: Andersson D. e Moroni S. (a cura di). Cities and Private Planning. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  60. Moroni S. (2015a). Libertà e innovazione nella città sostenibile. Roma: Carocci.
  61. Moroni S. (2015b). Suolo. In: Somaini E. (a cura di). I beni comuni oltre i luoghi comuni. Torino: IBL.
  62. Moroni S. (2015c). Beni di nessuno, beni di alcuni, beni di tutti: note critiche sull’incerto paradigma dei beni comuni. Scienze Regionali, 14(3): 137-144.
  63. Moroni S. (2016). Interventionist responsibilities for the emergence of the US housing bubble and the economic crisis: ‘neoliberal deregulation’ is not the issue. European Planning Studies (OnlineFirst,, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1168786)
  64. Moroni S., Chiodelli F. (2012). Ruolo dello spazio pubblico e presunti rischi di una sua scomparsa. Crios, 4: 30-38.
  65. Moroni S., Chiodelli F. (2013). The relevance of public space: Rethinking its material and political aspects. In: Basta C. e Moroni S. (a cura di), Ethics, Design and Planning of the Built Environment. Berlin: Springer.
  66. Moroni S., Chiodelli F. (2014). Public Spaces, Private Spaces, and the Right to the City. Journal of E-Planning, 3(1): 55-65.
  67. Moroni S., Chiodelli F. (2016). Urbanistica, moschee e altri luoghi di culto. Riflessioni a partire da una recente legge della regione Lombardia. Crios, 11: 21-34.
  68. O’Neal Z. P. (2010). Locating public space. In: O’Neal Z. P. & Orum A. M. (a cura di). Common ground? Reading and reflections on public space. London: Routledge.
  69. Papacharissi Z. (2002). The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society, 4(1), 9-27.
  70. Pennington M. (2002). A Hayekian liberal critique of collaborative planning. In: Allmendinger P. & Tewdwr-Jones M. (ed.). Planning futures. London: Routledge.
  71. Pennington M. (2003). Hayekian political economy and the limits of deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 51(4), 722-739.
  72. Pennington M. (2004). Citizen participation, the knowledge problem and urban land use planning. The Review of Austrian Economics, 17(2-3), 213-231.
  73. Pirenne H. (1927), Les villes du Moyen Age, Brux-elles; trad. it. Le città nel medioevo, Newton Compton, Roma, 2009.
  74. Purcell M. (2003). Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58(2-3), 99-108.
  75. Purcell M. (2013a). Possible worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(1), 141-154.
  76. Purcell M. (2013b). The right to the city: The struggle for democracy in the urban public realm. Policy & Politics, 43(3), 311-327.
  77. Romano M. (2005). L’estetica della città europea. Torino: Einaudi.
  78. Romano M. (2010). Ascesa e declino della città europea. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  79. Salcedo R. (2003). When the global meets the local at the Mall American. Behavioral Scientist, 46(8), 1084-1103.
  80. Smith V. L. (2009). Il nemico siamo noi. In: Mingardi A. (a cura di). La crisi ha ucciso il libero mercato?. Torino: IBL.
  81. Staeheli L. A., & Mitchell D. (2008). The people’s property? Power, politics, and the public. London: Routledge.
  82. Stillerman J., & Salcedo R. (2012). Transposing the urban to the mall: Routes, relationships, and re-sistance in two Santiago, Chile, shopping centers. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 41(3), 309-336.
  83. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Develop-ment. (1991). Not in my back yard. Removing barriers to affordable housing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
  84. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Develop-ment. (2005). Why not in our community? Removing barriers to affordable housing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
  85. Vitale E. (2013). Contro i beni comuni. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  86. Waldron J., ed. (1984). Theories of rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  87. Walker B. (2009). Review essay: The space of capitalism. Political Theory, 37(6), 823-837.

Stefano Moroni, Francesco Chiodelli, in "CRIOS" 13/2017, pp. 31-44, DOI:10.3280/CRIOS2017-013003

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche