Spazi urbani e diritto alla città

Titolo Rivista: CRIOS
Autori/Curatori: Stefano Moroni, Francesco Chiodelli
Anno di pubblicazione: 2017 Fascicolo: 13 Lingua: Italiano
Numero pagine: 14 P. 31-44 Dimensione file: 1217 KB
DOI: 10.3280/CRIOS2017-013003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit.
Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

  1. Agenzia del territorio. (2011). Gli immobili in Italia --(www.agenziaterritorio.it).
  2. Alfasi N., Portugali J. (2007). Planning Rules for a Self-Planned City. Planning Theory, 6(2), 164-182.
  3. Amin A. (2008). Collective culture and urban public space. City, 12(1), 5-24.
  4. Amin A., & Thrift N. (2001). Cities. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  5. Arendt H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
  6. Aristotle. Nicomachean etichs. Cambridge: Harvard University Press (1934).
  7. Aristotle. Politics. Harmondsworth: Penguin (1981).
  8. Attoh K. A. (2011). What kind of right is the right to the city? Progress in Human Geography, 35(5), 669-685.
  9. Banca d’Italia. (2011). La ricchezza delle famiglie italiane, anno 2010. --(www.bancaditalia.it).
  10. Banerjee T. (2001). The Future of Public Space: Beyond Invented Streets and Reinvented Places. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(1), 9-24.
  11. Barnett R.E. (1998). The Structure of Liberty. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  12. Basta C. (2016). On Marx’s human significance, Harvey’s right to the city, and Nussbaum’s capability approach. Planning Theory (OnLineFirst). DOI: 10.1177/1473095216641153
  13. Belli A. (2014). Spazio, differenza e ospitalità. La città oltre Henri Lefebvre. Roma: Carocci.
  14. Bobbio N. (1994). Il futuro della democrazia. Torino: Einaudi.
  15. Brundidge J. (2010). Encountering ‘difference’ in the contemporary public sphere: The contribution of the internet to the heterogeneity of political discussion networks. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 680-700.
  16. Buchanan A. (2005). Equality and human rights. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 4(1), 69-90.
  17. Carmona M. (2010). Contemporary public space, Part two: Classification. Journal of Urban Design, 15(2), 157-173.
  18. Carmona M., Tiesdell S., Heath T., & Ov T. (2010). Public places. Urban spaces. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  19. Chiodelli F. (2009). La cittadinanza secondo Henri Lefebvre: urbana, attiva, a matrice spaziale. Territorio, 51, 103-109.
  20. Chiodelli F. (2010). Enclaves private a carattere residenziale: il caso del co-housing. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 51(1), 95-116.
  21. Chiodelli F., Moroni S. (2013). Città, spazi pubblici e pluralismo: una discussione critica delle ordinanze comunali. Quaderni di scienza politica, 7(1), 125-144.
  22. Chiodelli F., Moroni S. (2014a). Typologies of spaces and topology of tolerance. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(2), 167-181.
  23. Chiodelli F., Moroni S. (2014b). Il problema del pluralismo negli spazi privati: attriti tra diritti fondamentali. Territorio, 67, 107-114.
  24. Cicalò E. (2010). Spazi pubblici. Progettare la dimensione pubblica della città contemporanea. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  25. Currie D.P. (1986). Positive and negative constitu-tional rights. The University of Chicago Law Review, 53, 864-890.
  26. Dikec M. (2005). (In)Justice and the ‘right to the city’. In: Wastl-Walter D., Staeheli L., & Dowler L. (a cura di). Rights to the City. Roma: Società Geografica Italiana.
  27. Di Masso A. (2012). Grounding citizenship: Toward a political psychology of public space. Political Psychology, 33(1), 123-143.
  28. Ellickson R.C. (1993). Property in land. Yale Law Journal, 102, 1315-1400.
  29. Ferraro G. (1990). La città nell’incertezza e la retorica del piano. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  30. Finnegan A.C., Saltsman A.P., White S.K. (2010). Negotiating politics and culture: The utility of human rights for activist organizing in the United States. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2(3), 307-333.
  31. Florida R. (2008). Who’s your city? New York: Basic Books.
  32. Freeden M. (1991). Rights. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
  33. Glaeser R. (2011). Triumph of the city. London: Macmillan.
  34. Hayek F. A. (1982). Law, legislation and liberty. London: Routledge.
  35. Hirschl R. (2000). ‘Negative’ rights vs. ‘positive’ entitlements. Human Rights Quarterly, 22, 1060-1098.
  36. Höffe O. (1987). Politische Gerechtigkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
  37. Holcombe R. G. (2012). Planning and the invisible hand: Allies or adversaries? Planning Theory, 12(2), 199-210.
  38. Isin E. F. (2008). The city as the site of the social. In: Isin E. F. (a cura di). Recasting the social in citizenship. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  39. Jabareen Y. (2014). The right to the city’ revisited: Assessing urban rights – The case of Arab cities in Israel. Habitat International, 41, 135-141.
  40. Jun N. (2012). Contribution of Internet news use to reducing the influence of selective online exposure on political diversity. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4), 1450-1457.
  41. Kirby A. (2008). The production of private space and its implications for urban social relations. Political Geography, 27(1), 74-95.
  42. Kohn M. (2013). Privatization and protest: Occupy Wall Street, occupy Toronto, and the occupation of public space in a democracy. Perspectives on Politics, 11(1), 99-110.
  43. Kukathas C. (1990). Hayek and modern liberalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  44. Lefebvre H. (1967). Vers le cybernanthrope: contre les technocrates. Paris: Denoël-Gonthier.
  45. Lefebvre H. (1968a). Le droit à la ville. Paris: Anthropos.
  46. Lefebvre H. (1968b). La vie quotidienne dans le monde modern. Paris: Gallimard.
  47. Lefebvre H. (1972). Espace et politique. Le droit à la ville II. Paris: Anthropos.
  48. Leoni B. (2007). Collettivismo e libertà economica. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.
  49. Lopez de Souza M. (2010). Which right to which city? In defence of political-strategic clarity. Interface, 2(1), 315-333.
  50. Madanipour A. (2009). Public and private spaces of the city. London: Routledge.
  51. Madanipour A. (Ed.). (2010a). Whose Public Space? London: Routledge.
  52. Madanipour A. (2010b). Introduction. In: Madanipour A. (Ed.). Whose Public Space?. Lon-don: Routledge.
  53. Marcuse P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City, 13(2-3), 185-197.
  54. Mitchell D. (1995). The end of public Space? Peo-ple’s park, definitions of the public, and democracy. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 85 (1), 108-133.
  55. Mitchell D. (2003). The right to the city. New York: The Guilford Press.
  56. Mitchell D. (2005). The S.U.V. model of citizenship: floating bubbles, buffer zones, and the rise of the “purely atomistic” individual. Political Geography, 24(1), 77-100.
  57. Moroni S. (2010). Rethinking the theory and practice of land-use regulation. Towards nomocracy. Planning Theory, 9(2), 137-155.
  58. Moroni S. (2012). Why nomocracy: Structural ignorance, radical pluralism and the role of relational rules. Progress in Planning, 77(2), 46-59.
  59. Moroni S. (2014). Towards a general theory of contractual communities. In: Andersson D. e Moroni S. (a cura di). Cities and Private Planning. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  60. Moroni S. (2015a). Libertà e innovazione nella città sostenibile. Roma: Carocci.
  61. Moroni S. (2015b). Suolo. In: Somaini E. (a cura di). I beni comuni oltre i luoghi comuni. Torino: IBL.
  62. Moroni S. (2015c). Beni di nessuno, beni di alcuni, beni di tutti: note critiche sull’incerto paradigma dei beni comuni. Scienze Regionali, 14(3): 137-144.
  63. Moroni S. (2016). Interventionist responsibilities for the emergence of the US housing bubble and the economic crisis: ‘neoliberal deregulation’ is not the issue. European Planning Studies (OnlineFirst, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2016.1168786)
  64. Moroni S., Chiodelli F. (2012). Ruolo dello spazio pubblico e presunti rischi di una sua scomparsa. Crios, 4: 30-38.
  65. Moroni S., Chiodelli F. (2013). The relevance of public space: Rethinking its material and political aspects. In: Basta C. e Moroni S. (a cura di), Ethics, Design and Planning of the Built Environment. Berlin: Springer.
  66. Moroni S., Chiodelli F. (2014). Public Spaces, Private Spaces, and the Right to the City. Journal of E-Planning, 3(1): 55-65.
  67. Moroni S., Chiodelli F. (2016). Urbanistica, moschee e altri luoghi di culto. Riflessioni a partire da una recente legge della regione Lombardia. Crios, 11: 21-34.
  68. O’Neal Z. P. (2010). Locating public space. In: O’Neal Z. P. & Orum A. M. (a cura di). Common ground? Reading and reflections on public space. London: Routledge.
  69. Papacharissi Z. (2002). The virtual sphere: The internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society, 4(1), 9-27.
  70. Pennington M. (2002). A Hayekian liberal critique of collaborative planning. In: Allmendinger P. & Tewdwr-Jones M. (ed.). Planning futures. London: Routledge.
  71. Pennington M. (2003). Hayekian political economy and the limits of deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 51(4), 722-739.
  72. Pennington M. (2004). Citizen participation, the knowledge problem and urban land use planning. The Review of Austrian Economics, 17(2-3), 213-231.
  73. Pirenne H. (1927), Les villes du Moyen Age, Brux-elles; trad. it. Le città nel medioevo, Newton Compton, Roma, 2009.
  74. Purcell M. (2003). Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58(2-3), 99-108.
  75. Purcell M. (2013a). Possible worlds: Henri Lefebvre and the right to the city. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(1), 141-154.
  76. Purcell M. (2013b). The right to the city: The struggle for democracy in the urban public realm. Policy & Politics, 43(3), 311-327.
  77. Romano M. (2005). L’estetica della città europea. Torino: Einaudi.
  78. Romano M. (2010). Ascesa e declino della città europea. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  79. Salcedo R. (2003). When the global meets the local at the Mall American. Behavioral Scientist, 46(8), 1084-1103.
  80. Smith V. L. (2009). Il nemico siamo noi. In: Mingardi A. (a cura di). La crisi ha ucciso il libero mercato?. Torino: IBL.
  81. Staeheli L. A., & Mitchell D. (2008). The people’s property? Power, politics, and the public. London: Routledge.
  82. Stillerman J., & Salcedo R. (2012). Transposing the urban to the mall: Routes, relationships, and re-sistance in two Santiago, Chile, shopping centers. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 41(3), 309-336.
  83. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Develop-ment. (1991). Not in my back yard. Removing barriers to affordable housing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
  84. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Develop-ment. (2005). Why not in our community? Removing barriers to affordable housing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
  85. Vitale E. (2013). Contro i beni comuni. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  86. Waldron J., ed. (1984). Theories of rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  87. Walker B. (2009). Review essay: The space of capitalism. Political Theory, 37(6), 823-837.

Stefano Moroni, Francesco Chiodelli, Spazi urbani e diritto alla città in "CRIOS" 13/2017, pp 31-44, DOI: 10.3280/CRIOS2017-013003