E-democrazia al lavoro: effetti e problematicità dell’era digitale

Titolo Rivista: SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO
Autori/Curatori: Valeria Pulignano
Anno di pubblicazione: 2021 Fascicolo: 160 Lingua: Italiano
Numero pagine: 17 P. 7-23 Dimensione file: 211 KB
DOI: 10.3280/SL2021-160001
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit.
Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Questo contributo mette in evidenza le problematicità derivanti dagli effetti della tecnologia digitale sulla democrazia. Tre sono i temi principali che vengo affrontati. Il primo è legato al controllo di sistemi tecnologici avanzati nelle mani di una élite che rischia di aumentare il suo potere e la sua influenza sulle masse di utenti e consumatori che utilizzano le nuove tecnologie. Il secondo tema, direttamente connesso al primo, riguarda la fiducia del pubblico verso le istituzioni democratiche a seguito dell’entrata in campo di sistemi di comunicazione digitale di massa, che spesso sono portatori di disinformazione e notizie false (‘fake news’). Il terzo tema, è quello del ‘capitalismo della sorveglianza’, che si lega alle relazioni industriali e di lavoro, nel senso che esamina le implicazioni che questo comporta per la democrazia, intesa come partecipazione diretta e indiretta dei lavoratori sui luoghi di lavoro.

  1. Bentivegna, S. (2006). Rethinking Politics in the Worlds of ICT. European Journal of Communication. 21(3): 331-343. DOI: 10.1177/1940161216646731
  2. Berger R. (2020). Democracy and Digital Disinformation. IEF.
  3. Breindl Y. (2010). Critique of the Democratic Potentialities of the Internet: A Review of Current Theory and Practice. TripleC. 8(1): 43-59.
  4. Kalleberg A. (2018). Precarious Lives. Jon Insecurity and Well-Being in Rich Democracies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  5. Ackers P. (2007). Collective Bargaining as Industrial Democracy: Hugh Clegg and the Political Foundations of British Industrial Relations Pluralism. British Journal of Industrial Relations 45(1): 77-101.
  6. Agodi M.C. (2003). L’immagine del Mezzogiorno nella sociologia degli ultimi cinquant’anni. Meridiana, 47/48: 23-63.
  7. Baccaro L., Howell C. (2017). Trajectories of neoliberal transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Bennett W.L., Segerbergb A. and Knüpfer C.B. (2018). The democratic interface: technology, political organization, and diverging patterns of electoral representation. Information, Communication & Society. 21(11): 1655-1680. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1348533
  9. Chadwick A., Stromer-Galley J. (2016). Digital media, power, and democracy in parties and election campaigns: Party decline or party renewal?. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 21(3): 283-293.
  10. Ciarini A., Girardi S. and Pulignano V. (2020). Reddito minimo e politiche attive del lavoro. Le trappole dell’attivazione work first e i mutamenti delle politiche sociali. In: Ciarini A., a cura di, Politiche di welfare a investimenti sociali. Bologna: il Mulino.
  11. Clegg H. (1976). Trade Unionism under Collective Bargaining. Oxford: Blackwell.
  12. Crouch C. (2004). Post-democracy. After the Crises. London: Wiley.
  13. Dahlgren P. (2009). Media and Political Engagement: Citizens, Communication and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Dahlgren P. (2004). Foreword. In: Van Donk W., Loader B.D., Nixon P.G. and Rucht D., eds., Cyberprotest: New Media, Citizens and Social Movements. London and New York: Routledge.
  15. Dahlgren P. (2005). The internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation. Political Communication. 22(2): 147-162. DOI: 10.1080/10584600590933160
  16. Dörre K. (2015). The New Landnahme: Dynamics and Limits of Financial Capitalism. In: Dörre K., Lessenich S., Rosa H., eds., Sociology – Capitalism – Critique. London: Verso.
  17. Flanders A. (1975). Management and Unions: The Theory and Reform of Industrial Relations. London: Faber.
  18. Franke M., Pulignano V. (2020). Connecting at the edge: Cycles of commodification and labour control within food delivery platform work in Belgium. Articolo presentato alla conferenza ILERA e SASE.
  19. Gallino L. (2007). Tecnologia e democrazia. Conoscenze tecniche e scientifiche come beni pubblici. Torino: Einaudi.
  20. Gandini A. (2019). Labour process theory and the gig economy. Human Relations. 72(6): 1039-1056. DOI: 10.1177/0018726718790002
  21. Gerber C. (2021). Community building on crowd-work platforms: Autonomy and control of online workers?. Competition and Change. 25(2): 190-211. DOI: 10.1177/102452942091447
  22. Gibson R., Greffet F. and Cantijoch M. (2017). Friend or foe? Digital technologies and the changing nature of party membership. Political Communication. 34(1): 89-111.
  23. Gillan K. (2008). Diverging attitudes to technology and innovation in Anti-War movement organisations. In: Häyhtiö T., Rinne J., eds., Net Work-ing/ Networking: Citizen Initiated internet Politics. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
  24. Guess A., Lockett D., Lyons B., Montgomery J. M., Nyhan B. and Reifler J. (2020). “Fake news” may have limited effects on political participation beyond increasing beliefs in false claims. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review.
  25. Habermas J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms. London: Polity Press.
  26. Hajo H. (2017). Re-Constructing the Future. Capitalist Organizations, Flexibility and the Temporality of Capitalism. Mimeo.
  27. Hardt M., Negri A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  28. Helmond A. (2015). The platformization of the web: Making web data platform ready. Social Media + Society. 1(2): 1-11. DOI: 10.1177/2056305115603080
  29. Hooghe M. (2018). Trust and Elections. In: Uslaner E.M., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust. Retrieved from www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190274801.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780190274801-e-17
  30. Jabagi N., Croteau A.M., Audebrand L.K. and Marsan J. (2019). ‘Gig-workers’ motivation: thinking beyond carrots and sticks. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 34(4): 192-213. DOI: 10.1108/JMP-06-2018-0255
  31. Lazer D.M.J., Baum M.A., Benkler Y., Berinsky A.J., Greenhill M., Menczer F. and Nyhan B. (2018). The science of fake news: Addressing fake news requires a multidisciplinary effort. Science. 4. 359(6380): 1094-1096.
  32. Lianos I., Countouris N. and De Stefano V. (2019). Re-thinking the competition law/labour law interaction: Promoting a fairer labour market. European Labour Law Journal. 10(3): 291-333.
  33. Meardi G. (2018). Economic Integration and State Responses: Change in European Industrial Relations since Maastricht. British Journal of Industrial Relations. 56(3): 631-655.
  34. Möhlmann M., Zalmanson L. (2017). Hands on the Wheel: Navigating Algorithmic management and Uber Drivers’ Autonomy. ICIS proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems. Seoul.
  35. Newman N., Fletcher R., Kalogeropoulos A., Levy D.A.L. and Nielsen R.K. (2018). Digital News Report 2018. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
  36. Ognyanova K., Lazer D., Robertson R.E. and Wilson C. (2020). Misinformation in action: Fake news exposure is linked to lower trust in media, higher trust in government when your side is in power. The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. 1(4).
  37. Paci M. (2005). Nuovi lavori, nuovo welfare. Bologna: il Mulino.
  38. Prassl J. (2018). Human as a Service. The Promise and Perils of the Gig Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  39. Pulignano V. (2018). Precariousness, Regime Competition and the Case of Europe, Research in the Sociology of Work. In: Kalleberg A., Vallas S., ed., Precarious Work. Bingley: Emerald.
  40. Pulignano V. (2019). Work in Deregulated Labour Markets: A Research Agenda for Precariousness. ETUI Working Papers Series. 3.
  41. Pulignano V. (2020). De sociale gevolgen van platformwerk op werk en tewerkstelling. In: Coene J., Vandenhole W., Hubeau B., Marchal S., Remmen R. and Raeymaeckers P., eds., Armoede en Sociale Uitsluiting, Jaarboek 2020. Leuven/Den haag: Acco.
  42. Putnam R.D. (1993). Making democracy work. Civic traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  43. Putnam R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  44. Rosenblat A., Stark L. (2016). Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers. International Journal of Communication. 10: 3758-3784. -- Retrieved from: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/4892/1739.
  45. Rubery J., Grimshaw D., Keizer A. and Johnson M. (2018). Challenges and contradic-tions in the ‘normalising’ of precarious work. Work, Employment & Society. 32(3): 509-527. DOI: 10.1177/0950017017751790
  46. Schor J., Attwood-Charles W. (2017). The Sharing Economy: Labor, Inequality and Sociability on for-Profit Platforms. Sociology Compass. 11(8): 1-16.
  47. Schörpf F., Flecker J., Schönauer A. and Eichmann H. (2017). Triangular love–hate: management and control in creative crowd-working. New Technology, Work and Employment. 32(1): 43-58. DOI: 10.1111/ntwe.12080.
  48. Shapiro A. (2020). Dynamic exploits: calculative asymmetries in the on‐demand economy. New Technology, Work and Employment. 35: 162-177. DOI: 10.1111/ntwe.12160.
  49. Shapiro A. (2018). Between autonomy and control: Strategies of arbitrage in the “on-demand” economy. New Media & Society. 20(8): 2954-2971. DOI: 10.1177/1461444817738236
  50. Srnicek N. (2017). Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  51. Tassinari A., Maccarone V. (2020). Riders on the Storm: Workplace Solidarity among Gig Economy Couriers in Italy and the UK. Work Employment and Society. 34(1): 35-54. DOI: 10.1177/095001701878561
  52. Van Dijck J., Poell T. and de Waal M. (2018). The Platform Society. Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford: OUP.
  53. Vandaele K. (2018). Will trade unions survive in the platform economy? Emerging patterns of platform workers’ collective voice and representation in Europe. ETUI Research Paper-Working Paper.
  54. Vromen A. (2008). Political change and the internet in Australia: introducing GetUp. In: Häyhtiö T., Rinne J., eds., NetWorking/ Networking: Citizen Initiated internet Politics. Tampere: Tampere University Press.
  55. Weeks B.E., Garrett R.K. (2014). Electoral Consequences of Political Rumors: Motivated Reasoning, Candidate Rumors, and Vote Choice during the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research. 26(4): 401-422.
  56. Wood A., Graham M., Lehdonvirta V. and Hjorth I. (2019). Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy. Work, Employment and Society. 33(1): 56-75. DOI: 10.1177/0950017018785616

Valeria Pulignano, E-democrazia al lavoro: effetti e problematicità dell’era digitale in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 160/2021, pp 7-23, DOI: 10.3280/SL2021-160001