Il valore dei dati digitali: uno studio sui lavoratori anziani in Italia

Journal title SALUTE E SOCIETÀ
Author/s Alessandra Gaia, Emma Garavaglia, Alessandro Caliandro
Publishing Year 2022 Issue 2022/3 Language Italian
Pages 19 P. 26-44 File size 464 KB
DOI 10.3280/SES2022-003003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

With the diffusion of Industry 4.0 and the digitalization of the economy, we have witnessed an increase in the monitoring of productive performances, through the use of digital technologies (e.g. Internet of Things, Cloud Manufacturing). To date, there is scarce empirical evidence on the awareness by older workers on the existence and the functioning of digital surveillance systems. Using large scale survey data we find that among old age workers those that are em-ployed in low skill jobs and manual workers have a lower awareness about digital extraction processes. Given that manual work is subject to processes of passive monitoring of productiv-ity it is particularly important to augment the awareness of extraction processes by the most vulnerable workers.

Keywords: smart working; old age population; older workers; surveillance capitalism; value of digital data; digital surveillance.

  1. Aragona B. (2021). Algorithm Audit: Why, What, and How?. London: Routledge.
  2. Arvidsson A. (2019). Changemakers: The Industrious Future of the Digital Economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  3. Binstock R.H., George L.K., Cutler S.J., Hendricks J., Schulz J.H., a cura di (2011). Handbook of aging and the social sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  4. Bratton B. (2021). The Revenge of the Real: Politics for a Post-Pandemic World. London: Verso Books.
  5. Brooke L., Taylor P. (2005). Older workers and employment: managing age relations. Ageing & Society, 25(3): 415-429. DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X0500346
  6. Burdon M., Cohen T. (2021). Modulation Harms and The Google Home. Surveillance & Society, 19 (2): 154-167.
  7. Caliandro A. (2020). Il capitalismo della sorveglianza. -- Testo disponibile al sito: (26/01/2022).
  8. Caliandro A., Garavaglia E., Sturiale V., Di Leva A. (2021). Older people and smartphone practices in everyday life: an inquire on digital sociality of italian older users. The Communication Review, 24 (1): 47-78. DOI: 10.1080/10714421.2021.190477
  9. Charness N. (2006). Work, older workers, and technology. Generations, 30 (2): 25-30.
  10. Cingolani P. (2021). L’informalità del capitale: tempi, lavoro e capitalismo delle piattaforme. Cambio. Rivista sulle trasformazioni sociali, 11 (21): 79-89.
  11. De Koning J., Gelderblom A. (2006). ICT and older workers: no unwrinkled relationship. International journal of manpower, 27 (5): 467-490. DOI: 10.1108/0143772061068396
  12. Delfanti A. (2021). Machinic dispossession and augmented despotism: Digital work in an Amazon warehouse. New Media & Society, 23 (1): 39-55. DOI: 10.1177/146144481989161
  13. Eubanks V. (2018). Automating inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  14. Eurofound (2021). European Working Conditions Surveys (EWCS). Testo disponibile al sito: (28/04/2022).
  15. Eurostat (2020). Population (Demography, Migration and Projections). -- Testo disponibile al sito: (30/01/2022).
  16. Favaretto M., De Clercq E., Elger B.S. (2019). Big Data and discrimination: perils, promises and solutions. A systematic review. Journal of Big Data, 6 (1): 1-27.
  17. Franco D., Tommasino P. (2020). Lessons From Italy: A Good Pension System Needs an Effective Broader Social Policy Framework. Intereconomics, 55 (2): 73-81.
  18. Gandini A. (2019). Labour process theory and the gig economy. Human Relations, 72 (6): 1039-1056. DOI: 10.1177/001872671879000
  19. Gandini A., Pais I. (2018). Social recruiting: control and surveillance in a digitised job market. In: Moore P.V., Upchurch M., Whittaker X., a cura di, Humans and machines at work: monitoring, surveillance and automation in contemporary capitalism. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  20. Garavaglia E., Marcaletti F., Iñiguez-Berrozpe T. (2021). Action research in age management: the quality of ageing at work model. Work, Aging and Retirement, 7 (4): 339-351.
  21. Istat (2016). Aspetti della vita quotidiana. UniData - Bicocca Data Archive, Milano. Codice indagine SN190. Versione del file di dati 1.0.
  22. Istat (2018). Aspetti della vita quotidiana. Periodo di riferimento: anno 2016. Aspetti metodologici dell’indagine. -- Testo disponibili al sito: (26/01/2022).
  23. Lee C.C., Czaja S.J., Sharit, J. (2008). Training older workers for technology-based employment. Educational Gerontology, 35 (1): 15-31. DOI: 10.1080/0360127080230009
  24. Levy K., Barocas S. (2018). Refractive surveillance: Monitoring customers to manage workers. International Journal of Communication, 12 (23): 1166-1188.
  25. Lupton D. (2014). Digital sociology. London: Routledge.
  26. Lyon D. (2018). The culture of surveillance: Watching as a way of life. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
  27. Marcaletti F., Garavaglia E., Milone A.M. (2014). Age management. Teoria e pratica per la gestione dell’età nelle organizzazioni di lavoro. Milano: FrancAngeli.
  28. McDonald P., Thompson P., O’Connor P. (2016). Profiling employees online: shifting public-private boundaries in organisational life. Human Resource Management Journal, 26 (4): 541-556. DOI: 10.1111/1748-8583.1212
  29. Millward P. (2003). The ‘grey digital divide’: Perception, exclusion and barriers of access to the Internet for older people. First Monday, 8 (7).
  30. Moro A., Rinaldini M., Staccioli J., Virgillito M.E. (2019). Control in the era of surveillance capitalism: an empirical investigation of Italian Industry 4.0 factories. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 46 (3): 347-360.
  31. Newlands G. (2020). Algorithmic Surveillance in the Gig Economy: The Organization of Work through Lefebvrian Conceived Space. Organization Studies, 42 (5): 719-737. DOI: 10.1177/017084062093790
  32. Ocse (2006). Live Longer, Work Longer. Parigi: Ocse.
  33. Parlamento Europeo (2022). Eurobarometro. -- Testo disponibile al sito: (28/04/2022).
  34. Puntoni S., Reczek R.W., Giesler M., Botti S. (2021). Consumers and artificial intelligence: An experiential perspective. Journal of Marketing, 85 (1): 131-151. DOI: 10.1177/002224292095384
  35. Risi E., Pronzato R. (2021). Smart working is not so smart: Always-on lives and the dark side of platformisation. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation, 15 (1): 107-125.
  36. Rogers W.H. (1993). Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin, 3 (13): 19-23.
  37. Sala E., Gaia A. (2019). Older People’s Use of Information and Communication Technology in Europe: The Italian Case. Autonomie locali e servizi sociali, 2: 163-183. DOI: 10.1447/9586
  38. Sala E., Gaia A., Cerati G. (2020). The gray digital divide in social networking site use in Europe: Results from a quantitative study. Social Science Computer Review, 40 (2): 328-345. DOI: 10.1177/089443932090950
  39. SHARE-ERIC (2022). Survey on Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. -- Testo disponibile al sito: (28/04/2022).
  40. Srnicek N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  41. Tams S., Grover V., Thatcher J., Ahuja M. (2021). Grappling with modern technology: interruptions mediated by mobile devices impact older workers disproportionately. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 1-21.
  42. Tourangeau R., Rips L.J., Rasinski K. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  43. Vallas S.P. (2019). Platform capitalism: What’s at stake for workers?. New Labor Forum, 28 (1): 48-59. DOI: 10.1177/109579601881705
  44. Zuboff S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. London: Profile Books.

Alessandra Gaia, Emma Garavaglia, Alessandro Caliandro, Il valore dei dati digitali: uno studio sui lavoratori anziani in Italia in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 3/2022, pp 26-44, DOI: 10.3280/SES2022-003003