Women participation in academic management positions. Evidence from Italian universities

Author/s Silvia Fissi, Alberto Romolini, Elena Gori, Marco Contri
Publishing Year 2022 Issue 2022/3
Language English Pages 14 P. 163-176 File size 309 KB
DOI 10.3280/MACO2022-003008
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Sustainable Development Goal 5 aims to achieve women’s full and effective participation as well as equal opportunities for leadership at all levels of decision-making. Our research focuses on the higher education sector and aims to analyse the current gender gap in Italian universities. Specifically, this paper studies the effective presence of women in leadership role through the disclosure provided in gender reports. The research approach is based on a content analysis of the gender reports published by Italian universities, collecting information about the presence of women in academic leadership roles (such as rector, board of directors, school president, department director, etc.). This research has an exploratory nature as, to the best of our knowledge, previous studies have not analysed this topic in Italian higher institutions. It also represents a possible bridge between two different research areas: gender gap studies and social reporting. The results provide an instrument for evaluating the effectiveness of the gender policies in the university sector for national policymakers (such as the Ministry of Education and Italian Rectors Conference) and rectors and board members of higher institutions.

Keywords: Gender gap, Universities, Gender reporting, Social reporting, Italy

  1. Adams R.B., Funk P. (2012), Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter?, Management Science, 58(2), pp. 219-235.
  2. Åberg C., Bankewitz M., Knockaert M. (2019), Service tasks of board of directors: A literature review and research agenda in an era of new governance practices, European Management Journal, 37(5), pp. 648-663.
  3. Addabbo T., Rodríguez-Modroño P., Gálvez-Muñox L. (2015), Gender budgeting in education from a wellbeing approach: an application to Italy and Spain, Politica Economica, 31(2), pp. 195-212.
  4. Addabbo T., Canali C., Facchinetti, G., Pirotti T. (2018), Measuring Gender Equality in Universities, in International Multi-Conference on Advanced Computer Systems (pp. 109-121), Springer, Cham.
  5. Addabbo T., Naciti V., Noto G., Vermiglio C. (2020), Budgeting for gender equality in research performing organizations, Politica Economica/Journal of Economic Policy, XXXVI(3), pp. 417-438.
  6. Addabbo T., Badalassi G., Canali C. (2021), Gender budgeting in academia: a powerful tool for gender equality, in ICGR 2021 4th International Conference on Gender Research (p. 1). Academic Conferences Inter Ltd.
  7. Arena G. (2020), Il bilancio di genere in ateneo: ripensare la spesa pubblica, coinvolgere la città, Autonomie locali e servizi sociali, 43(1), pp. 179-191.
  8. Baldarelli M.G., Baldo M.D., Vignini S. (2016), Pink accounting in Italy: cultural perspectives over discrimination and/or lack of interest, Meditari Accountancy Research, 24(2), pp. 269-292.
  9. Benschop Y., Brouns M. (2003), Crumbling ivory towers: Academic organizing and its gender effects, Gender, Work & Organization, 10(2), pp. 194-212.
  10. Campopiano G., Gabaldón P., Gimenez-Jimenez D. (2022), Women directors and corporate social performance: An integrative review of the literature and a future research agenda, Journal of Business Ethics.
  11. Censis (2021), La classifica Censis delle Università italiane (edizione 2021/2022). -- https://www.censis.it/sites/default/files/downloads/Classifica%20Censis%20delle%20Universit%C3%A0%202021-2022_0.pdf.
  12. Chen G.L., Crossland C., Huang S. (2016), Female board representation and corporate acquisition intensity, Strategic Management Journal, 37(2), pp. 303-313.
  13. Dezsö C.L., Ross D.G. (2012), Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation, Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), pp. 1072-1089.
  14. Dobija D., Hryckiewicz A., Zaman M., Puławska K. (2022), Critical mass and voice: Board gender diversity and financial reporting quality, European Management Journal, 40(1), pp. 29-44.
  15. Erbe B. (2015), Gender mainstreaming in public financing of universities: central findings for Germany, Politica Economica, 31(2), pp. 213-232.
  16. European Commission (2020), Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A union of equality: Gender Equality Strategy 2020-2025. -- https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0152.
  17. European Commission (2021), She figures 2021. Gender in research and innovation: statistics and indicators. -- https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/06090.
  18. European Communities (1997), Amsterdam treaty. -- https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/treaty/pdf/amst-en.pdf.
  19. European Institute for Gender Equality (2016), What is gender mainstreaming -- https://eige.europa.eu/gender-mainstreaming/what-is-gender-mainstreaming.
  20. European University Association (2021), Despite gains, women still highly outnumbered by men as university leaders. -- https://eua.eu/news/645:despite-gains,-women-still-highly-outnumbered-by-men-as-university-leaders.html.
  21. Eurostat (2021), The life of women and men in Europe. -- https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/infographs/womenmen.
  22. Fritsch N. S. (2016), Patterns of career development and their role in the advancement of female faculty at Austrian universities: New roads to success?, Higher Education, pp. 619-635.
  23. García Lara J. M., García Osma B., Mora A., Scapin M. (2017), The monitoring role of female directors over accounting quality, Journal of Corporate Finance, 45, pp. 651-668.
  24. Glass C., Cook A. (2016), Leading at the top: Understanding women’s challenges above the glass ceiling, The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), pp. 51-63.
  25. Heijstra T.M., Einarsdóttir Þ., Pétursdóttir G.M., Steinþórsdóttir F.S. (2017), Testing the concept of academic housework in a European setting: part of academic career-making or gendered barrier to the top?, European Educational Research Journal, 16(2-3), pp. 200-214.
  26. Klatzer E., Addabbo T., Alarcón-García G., O’Hagan A. (2018), Developments in practice: Methodologies and approaches to Gender Budgeting, in A. O’Hagan and E. Klatzer (eds.) Gender Budgeting in Europe. Developments and challenges, Cham, Palgrave Macmillan.
  27. Kloot L. (2004), Women and leadership in universities: a case study of women academic managers, The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(6), pp. 470-485.
  28. Maheshwari G. (2021), A review of literature on women’s leadership in higher education in developed countries and in Vietnam: Barriers and enablers, Educational Management Administration & Leadership.
  29. Mazzotta R., Nardo M.T. Pastore P., Vingelli G. (2020), Board composition and gender sensitivity approach in Italian universities, Meditari Accountancy Research, 28(6), pp. 1013-1036.
  30. Nielsen S., Huse M. (2010), Women directors contribution to board decision-making and strategic involvement: the role of equality perception, European Management Review, 7(1), pp. 16-29.
  31. Perryman A.A., Fernando D.G., Tripathy A. (2016), Do gender differences persist? An examination of gender diversity on firm performance, risk, and executive compensation, Journal of Business Research, 69(2), pp. 579-586.
  32. Potipiroon W., Srisuthisa-ard A., Faerman S. (2019), Public service motivation and customer service behaviour: Testing the mediating role of emotional labour and the moderating role of gender, Public Management Review, 21(5), pp. 650-668.
  33. Pulejo L. (2013), Il “bilancio di genere”: uno strumento di analisi e di programmazione per le Università nell’ottica della strategia di gender mainstreaming, Annali della Facoltà di Economia Università degli Studi di Messina, 3, pp. 119-130.
  34. Ramos A., Latorre F., Tomás I., Ramos J. (2022), TOP WOMAN: Identifying barriers to women’s access to management, European Management Journal, 40(1), pp. 45-55.
  35. Rao K., Tilt C. (2016), Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy and decision making, Journal of Business Ethics, 138, pp. 327-347.
  36. Rothe A., Erbe B., Fröhlich W., Klatzer E., Lapniewska Z., Mayrhofer M., Neumayr M., Pichlbauer M., Tarasiewicz M., Zebisch J., Debski M. (2008), Gender budgeting as a management strategy for gender equality at universities. Concluding project report, Munich, Frauenakademie München.
  37. Sharp R., Broomhill R. (2002), Budgeting for equality: the Australian experience, Feminist Economics, 8(1), pp. 25-47.
  38. Shepherd S. (2017), Why are there so few female leaders in higher education: a case of structure or agency?, Management in Education, 31(2), pp. 82-87.
  39. Steinþórsdóttir F.S., Einarsdóttir Þ., Heijstra T.M., Pétursdóttir G.M., Smidt T.B. (2018), Gender budgeting to expose inequalities in a precarious academia – and redistribute resources to effect change, in Murgia A., Poggio B. (eds), Gender and Precarious Research Careers (pp. 83-110), Routledge.
  40. Steinþórsdóttir F.S., Brosen Smidt T., Pétursdóttir G.M., Einarsdóttir Þ., Le Feuvre N. (2019), New managerialism in the academy: gender bias and precarity, Gender, Work & Organization, 26(2), pp. 124-139.
  41. UN Women (2018), Turning promises into action: Gender equality in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. -- https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2018/2/gender-equality-in-the-2030-agenda-for-sustainable-development-2018.
  42. UNESCO International Institute for Higher Education in Latin America and the Caribbean (UNESCO/IESALC, 2021), Women in higher education: has the female advantage put an end to gender inequalities?, -- https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000377182.
  43. Van Vo L., Nguyen H.T.H., Le H.T.T. (2021), Do female CEOs make a difference in firm operations? Evidence from Vietnam, Accounting and Finance, 61, pp. 1489-1516.

Silvia Fissi, Alberto Romolini, Elena Gori, Marco Contri, Women participation in academic management positions. Evidence from Italian universities in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" 3/2022, pp 163-176, DOI: 10.3280/MACO2022-003008