EU-Russia Cooperation in a rapidly changing interregional gas market

Author/s Morena Skalamera
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2013/3
Language English Pages 35 P. 31-65 File size 2056 KB
DOI 10.3280/EFE2013-003002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

In the past few years the gas sector has experienced a wave of unprecedented changes. The increasing globalization of gas markets and the technological breakthrough of shale gas production in the United States have triggered deep changes in Eurasian gas market governance. The long-established oil indexation in gas contracts is now challenged not only by the European Commission’s efforts at liberalization but also by the private sector. The industrial sector’s support for change has provoked a robust redefinition of gas governance structures between Russia and the EU, amidst Russian calls for the support of long-term gas contracts. The latter, from its perspective as a rising power in its own right, has no intention of importing EU’s regulatory structures on its territory and is resisting them while operating in the EU. Against this background, this paper seeks to investigate the issues that are arising with respect to the EU’s desire to change the institutional arrangements in gas trade with Russia. If the EU seizes the paradigm change as a moment to take Russia’s proposals and ideas into consideration, the energy partnership could become more solid and symmetrical. In contrast, should the downward spiral of mutual disappointment continue, Russia will increasingly turn eastwards. In that context, if the US decides to withhold its shale gas bonanza for domestic use during a complicated shale revolution in the Old continent, the unreliability of Russian gas could force Europe to rethink its strategies.

Keywords: EU-Russia, energy cooperation, paradigm change, industrial sector’s interests

Jel codes: Q48

  1. Journal articles, books and reports
  2. Abdelal R. (2011). The Profits of Power: Commerce and Realpolitik in Eurasia, Harvard Business School Working Paper.
  3. Aslund A. (2010). Gazprom: Challenged Giant in need for Reform. Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  4. Baumol W.J. (1982). Contestable Markets: An Uprising in the Theory of Industry Structure. The American Economic Review, 72, 1: 1-15.
  5. Baumol W.J., Panzar J.C., Willig R.D. (1983). On the theory of perfectly contestable markets. Bell Telephone Laboratories.
  6. Beckman K., De Jong D. (2012). It’s finally coming: the great European gas market transformation. European Energy Review.
  7. Ferguson N. (2010). Complexity and Collapse - Empires on the Edge of Chaos. Foreign Affairs.
  8. Gény F. (2010). Can Unconventional Gas be a Game Changer in European Gas Markets? The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies
  9. Goldthau A. (2010). Energy Diplomacy in Trade and Investment of Oil and Gas. In: Goldthau A. and Witte J.M. Global Energy Governance: The New Rules of the Game. Global Public Policy Institute, Berlin, Chapter 2, pp. 25-48.
  10. Goldthau A. (2012). From the State to the Market and Back: Policy Implications of Changing Energy Paradigms. Global Policy, 3, 2.
  11. Henderson J. (2011). Domestic Gas Prices in Russia – Towards Export Netback? The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
  12. Hulbert M. (2012). Why America Can Make or Break A New Global Gas World. Forbes.
  13. IEA (2011a). Are we entering a Golden Age of Gas? Special Report WEO 2011, OECD/IEA, 201.
  14. IEA (2011b). World Energy Outlook, Year 2011.
  15. IEA (2011c). Gas Emergency Policy: where do IEA countries stand? May 2011.
  16. Ikenberry J.G. (2011). The Future of the Liberal World Order- Internationalism After America, Foreign Affairs.
  17. IHS CERA (2010). Rising to the Challenge: Turning North America’s Unconventional Gas Supply Potential into Reality.
  18. Konoplyanik A. (2012). Russian gas at European energy market: Why adaptation is inevitable. Energy Strategy Reviews.
  19. Kuhn M., Umbach F. (2011a). Strategic Perspectives of Unconventional Gas: a game changer with implication for the EU’s energy security. EUCERS Strategy Paper.
  20. Kuhn M. and Umbach F. (2011b). Unconventional Gas Resources: A Transatlantic Shale Alliance? Koranyi (ed.). Transatlantic Energy Futures. Washington, DC: Center for Transatlantic Relations, Chapter 10, pp. 207- 228.
  21. Kuhn T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
  22. Kuzemko C. et al. (2012). Dynamics of Energy Governance in Europe and Russia. Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230370944
  23. Maugeri L. (2010). Conclusions: How can we escape our Energy Trap? In: Maugeri L. Beyond the Age of Oil: the myths, realities and future of fossil fuels and their alternatives. Praeger, pp. 205-219.
  24. Maugeri L. (2012). Toglieteci tutto ma non il gas. l’Espresso.
  25. Mitrova T., Belova M. (2012). The gas market in Europe: spot vs. long-term contracts. The Energy Centre Skolkovo, January.
  26. Nye Joseph Jr. (2012). Presentation at Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government “The Future of Power”.
  27. Ruggie J.G. (1982). International regimes, transactions and change: embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization, 36, 2. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300018993
  28. Stern J. and Rogers H. (2011). The Transition to Hub-Based Gas Pricing in Continental Europe. The Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
  29. Stern J., Mitrova T., Belova M. (2012). European Gas Market: dreams are not always coming true. Skolkovo Energy Center.
  30. Talus K. (2012). Winds of Change: Long-Term gas Contracts and Changing Energy Paradigms in the European Union. In: Kuzemko C. et al. Dynamics of Energy Governance in Europe and Russia. Palgrave Macmillan, Chapter 11, pp. 227-242.
  31. The European Commission (2007). Competition at National and International Levels: Energy Annex A – Regulatory Framework, Geneva
  32. Van derLinde C. (2010). Energy company strategies in the dynamic EU energy market (1995-2007). CIEP.
  33. Westphal K. (2012). Security of Gas Supply, SWP Comments 17.
  34. World Bank Publications (2010). The Future of the Natural Gas Market in Southeast Europe, p. 12.
  35. Media articles and web sites
  36. Bloomberg, U.S. Shale Gas Exports Face Hurdles, Former Exxon CEO Says”, By Kari Lundgren, February 10, 2012
  37. Der Spiegel, Germany’s Nuclear Phase-Out Brings Unexpected Costs”, June 6, 2012
  38. European Energy Review, “We need a decarbonisation policy that favours gas,” Interview: Jean-François Cirelli on changes in the European gas industry by Sonja van Renssen, April 2012
  39. European Energy Review, Beckman, K. Interview with FatihBirol, Chief Economist of the International Energy Agency “European countries missed a big opportunity by closing their doors to shale gas in a dogmatic way,” 19 November 2012.
  40. European Energy Review, The big fracking chill in Eastern Europe – Report, 10 December 2012
  41. Euractiv, “Gazprom cuts European sales target, raises price”, 10 April 2012, updated 04 September 2012
  42. Euractiv, “Putin fears shale gas competition”, published 12 April 2012
  43. Financial Times, “Ukraine opens shale gas reserves to exploration”, By Roman Olearchyk in Kiev and Guy Chazan, February 23, 2012
  44. Forbes, The U.S. Has A Natural Gas Glut; Why Exporting It As LNG Is A Good Idea, by Christopher Helman, June 13, 2012
  45. Reuters, Russia, China find compromise on gas deal after 15 year standoff, Mar 25, 2013
  46. RiaNovosti, Gazprom signs Corrective Gas Price Contract with E.ON, July 3, 2012
  47. The Economist, Gas in the eastern Mediterranean - Drill or quarrel?, Jan 12th 2013
  48. The Economist, The Cypriot gasfield – Hot air, Mar 23rd 2013.
  49. The Economist, Russia’s wounded giant, March 23, 2013.
  50. The European Commission:, Accessed in October 2012.
  51. The European Commission, DG Energy, Roadmap 2050:, Accessed in May 2012.
  52. The Wall Street Journal, “E.ON Settles Gazprom Dispute” July 3, 2012.
  53. The Wall Street Journal, “Gazprom Postpones Development of Shtokman Field,”August 30, 2012.

  • From “Greater Europe” to “Greater Eurasia”: Status concerns and the evolution of Russia’s approach to alignment and regional integration Andrej Krickovic, Igor Pellicciari, in Journal of Eurasian Studies /2021 pp.86
    DOI: 10.1177/1879366521998808

Morena Skalamera, EU-Russia Cooperation in a rapidly changing interregional gas market in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 3/2013, pp 31-65, DOI: 10.3280/EFE2013-003002