Can Wittgenstein be called a pragmatist?

Journal title PARADIGMI
Author/s Danièle Moyal-Sharrock
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2016/3 Language English
Pages 19 P. 67-85 File size 218 KB
DOI 10.3280/PARA2016-003005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

When Wittgenstein is called a pragmatist, it is usually with qualification. In this paper, I examine some of the criteria used to relate Wittgenstein to pragmatism (primacy of action, anti-foundationalism, fallibilism), and conclude that inasmuch as Wittgenstein is neither an anti-foundationalist nor a fallibilist, there may not be sufficient grounds to call him a pragmatist. But nothing stands in the way of considering him a full-fledged enactivist.

Keywords: Wittgenstein, Pragmatism, Enactivism, Foundationalism, Fallibilism.

  1. Bouveresse J. (1987). Le “pragmatisme” de Wittgenstein. In: Le Mythe de l’intériorité: Expérience, signification et langage privé chez Wittgenstein. Paris: Minuit: 567-589.
  2. Brandom R. (2002). Pragmatics and pragmatisms. In: Conant J. and Zeglen U., eds. Hilary Putnam: Pragmatism and realism. London: Routledge: 40-58.
  3. Cavell S. (1979). The claim of reason: Wittgenstein, skepticism, morality, and tragedy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Chauviré C. (2004). Le moment anthropologique de Wittgenstein. Paris: Kimé.
  5. Coliva A. (2010). Moore and Wittgenstein: skepticism, certainty, and common sense. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  6. Conway G. (1989). Wittgenstein on foundations. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
  7. Currie G. (2000). Imagination, delusion and hallucinations. Mind & Language: Pathologies of Belief, 15, 1: 168-183, DOI: 10.1111/1468-0017.00128
  8. Davies M. and Colthearth M. (2000). Pathologies of belief. Mind & Language: Pathologies of Belief 15, 1: 1-46, DOI: 10.1111/1468-0017.00122
  9. Diamond C. (1991). The realistic spirit: Wittgenstein, philosophy, and the mind. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
  10. Glock H.-J. (2003). Quine and Davidson on logic, thought and reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Hamilton A. (2014). Wittgenstein and ‘On certainty’. London: Routledge.
  12. Hertzberg L (1992). Primitive reactions – Logic or anthropology. Midwest Studies in Philosophy XVII. The Wittgenstein legacy: 24-39,
  13. Hutto D.D. (2013). Enactivism, from a Wittgensteinian point of view. American Philosophical Quarterly, 50, 3 (July 2013): 281-302.
  14. Hutto D.D. (2015). Contentless perceiving: the very idea. In: Campbell M. and O’Sullivan M., eds. Wittgenstein and perception. London: Routledge: 63-83.
  15. Hutto D.D, and Myin E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism: Basic minds without content. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  16. Johanson A. (1994). Peirce and Wittgenstein’s ‘On certainty’. In: Debrock G. and Hulswit M, eds. Living doubt. Essays concerning the epistemology of C.S. Peirce. Dordrecht: Kluwer: 171-186.
  17. Levi I. (1999). Pragmatism and change of view in pragmatism, ed. by C. Misak. Calgary: University of Calgary Press: 177-201.
  18. Lewis C.L. (1922). A pragmatic conception of the a priori. In: Collected papers, ed. by J.D. Goheen and J.L. Mothershead. Standford, CA: Stanford University Press: 231-239.
  19. Wittgenstein L. (1997). Philosophical investigations. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell (PI).
  20. Wright C. (1985). Facts and certainty. Proceedings of the British Academy, 71: 429-472.
  21. Wright C. (2004). Wittgensteinian certainties. In: McManus D., ed. Wittgenstein and scepticism. London: Routledge: 22-55.
  22. Wittgenstein L. (1993). Cause and effect: intuitive awareness (1937). In: Klagge J.C. and Nordman A., eds., Philosophical occasions: 1912-1951. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing: 371-426 (CE).
  23. Wittgenstein L. (1980). Remarks on the philosophy of psychology, Vol. I, ed. by G.E.M. Anscombe and G.H. von Wright. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell. (RPP I).
  24. Wittgenstein L. (1979). Wittgenstein’s lectures: Cambridge, 1932-1935. From the notes of A. Ambrose and M. MacDonald, ed. by A. Ambrose. Oxford: Blackwell (AWL).
  25. Wittgenstein L. (1979): Wittgenstein and Vienna Circle. Conversations recorded by Waismann F., ed. by B. McGuinness Oxford: Blackwell (WVC).
  26. Wittgenstein L. (1978). Remarks on the foundations of mathematics, ed. by G.H. von Wright, R. Rhees and G.E.M. Anscombe. Trans. G.E.M. Anscombe. 3rd revised ed. Oxford: Blackwell (RFM).
  27. Wittgenstein L. (1977). On certainty, ed. by G.E.M. Anscombe and von G.H. Wright. Trans. D. Paul and G.E.M Anscombe. Amended 1st ed. Oxford: Blackwell (OC).
  28. Wittgenstein L. (1976). Wittgenstein’s lectures on the foundations of mathematics. Cambridge 1939. From the Notes of R.G. Bosanquet, N. Malcolm, R. Rhees, and Y. Smythies, ed. by C. Diamond. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press (LFM).
  29. Wittgenstein L. (1974). Philosophical grammar, ed. by R. Rhees. Trans. A. Kenny. Oxford: Blackwell (PG).
  30. Wittgenstein L. (1970). Zettel, ed. by G.E.M. Anscombe and G.H. von Wright. Trans. Anscombe G.E.M., Berkeley: University of California Press, 1970 (Z).
  31. Wittgenstein L. (1922). Tractatus logico-philosophicus, ed. by D.F. Pears and B.F. McGuinness. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London 1961 (T).
  32. Williams M. (2005). Why Wittgenstein isn’t a foundationalist. In: Moyal-Sharrock D. and Brenner W., eds. Readings of Wittgenstein’s ‘On certainty’. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan: 47-8.
  33. Williams M. (1991). Unnatural doubts: epistemological realism and the basis of scepticism. Oxford, Blackwell.
  34. Young M.W., ed. (1979). The ethnography of Malinowski: The Trobriand Islands 1915-18. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  35. Rorty R. (1980). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Oxford: Blackwell.
  36. Putnam H. (1995). Pragmatism: An open question. Oxford: Blackwell.
  37. Pritchard D. (2012). Wittgenstein and the groundlessness of our believing. Synthèse, 189: 255-272.
  38. Pihlström S. (2012). A new look at Wittgenstein and pragmatism. European Journal of Pragmatism & American Philosophy, 4, 12: 9-26.
  39. Phillips D.Z. (1988). Faith after foundationalism. London: Routledge.
  40. Moyal-Sharrock D. (2016). The animal in epistemology: Wittgenstein’s enactivist solution to the problem of regress. In: Hinge epistemology, special issue of the International Journal for the Study of Skepticism, 6: 97-119,
  41. Moyal-Sharrock D. (2013b). On Coliva’s judgmental hinges. Philosophia (March 2013), 41, 1: 13-25.
  42. Moyal-Sharrock D. (2013a). Wittgenstein’s razor: The cutting edge of enactivism. APQ, 50, 3 (July 2013): 263-280.
  43. Moyal-Sharrock D. (2007). Understanding Wittgenstein’s ‘On certainty’. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  44. Moyal-Sharrock D. (2003). Logic in action: Wittgenstein’s logical pragmatism. Philosophical Investigations, 26, 2: 125-148, DOI: 10.1111/1467-9205.00291
  45. Moyal-Sharrock D. (2000). Words as deeds: Wittgenstein’s “spontaneous utterances” and the dissolution of the explanatory gap. Philosophical Psychology, 1, 3 (September 2000): 355-372, DOI: 10.1080/09515080050128169

Danièle Moyal-Sharrock, Can Wittgenstein be called a pragmatist? in "PARADIGMI" 3/2016, pp 67-85, DOI: 10.3280/PARA2016-003005