Clicca qui per scaricare

Pluralizzare il capitalocene, pensare la transizione. Investimenti agricoli in Africa e nuova questione agraria
Autori/Curatori: Maura Benegiamo 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2019 Fascicolo: 120  Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  15 P. 62-76 Dimensione file:  199 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SUR2019-120005
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 

This paper aims to integrate the socio-ecological critique of capitalist valorization with some indications developed in the post-colonial debate and the neo-materialist perspectives. It builds on an analysis of the land grab phenomena and its connections with recent agricultural development policies, involving green and bio-economy promotion in Sub-Saharan Africa. It firstly expands on the relationships between the neoliberal ecological regime and the racialized pattern of colonial appropriation that inform current agrarian governance processes. Then, re-calling the results of a case study on a land-deal conflict in the north of Senegal, it discusses the interest of a political ecology approach focused on a post-colonial reading of world-ecology, able to include in the narrative of capitalocene the alternative and subaltern socio-ecological stories that inhabit it. This, it will be argued, offers a useful perspective to re-imagine socio-ecological transition as a plural and more-than-human process.
Keywords: Anthropocene, agrarian question, new-materialism, land grabbing, pastoralism, Senegal

  1. Abbatini D., Maggi M., Rugiero S. (2013). I venti anni della sociologia dell’ambiente in Italia. Sociologia e ricerca sociale, 102: 5-17., DOI: 10.3280/SR2013-10200
  2. Adriansen H.K. (2008). Understanding pastoral mobility: the case of Senegalese Fulani. Geographical Journal, 174: 207-222.
  3. Akram-Lodhi A.H., Kay C. (2010). Surveying the agrarian question (part 1): current debates and beyond. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(2), 255-284., DOI: 10.1080/0306615090349883
  4. Amanor K.S. (2012). Global resource grabs, agribusiness concentration and the smallholder: two West African case studies. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3-4), 731-749., DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2012.67654
  5. Araghi F. (2003). Food regimes and the production of value: Some methodological issues. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 30(2), 41-70., DOI: 10.1080/0306615041233131112
  6. Barca S. (2017). L’Antropocene: una narrazione politica. Riflessioni Sistemiche, (17), 56-67.
  7. Baglioni E., Gibbon P. (2013). Land Grabbing, Large- and Small-scale Farming: what can evidence and policy from 20th century Africa contribute to the debate? Third World Quarterly, 34:9., DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2013.84383
  8. Benegiamo M., Cirillo D. (2014). No Land, No future. ActionAid international. -- Testo disponibile al sito: (ultimo accesso 20 febbraio 2019)
  9. Benegiamo M., Cirillo D. (2016). Agroindustria e pastorizia nel delta del fiume Senegal. Dai margini ai limiti dello sviluppo. In Bin, S. Donadelli, G. Quatrida, D. Visentin F. (Eds.). Labor Limites. Riconoscere, vivere e riprogettare i limiti. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  10. Benegiamo M. (2018). Resilience, Political Ecology and Degrowth a critical review of three main approaches in political geography and urban planning theory. In Anguillari E., Dimitrijević B., Marković M. (eds.) Integrated Urban Planning. Klabs Book series 3. TU-Delft Open Publisher.
  11. Birch K., Tyfield D. (2013). Theorizing the Bioeconomy: Biovalue, Biocapital, Bioeconomics or... What? Science, Technology, & Human Values, 38(3): 299-327., DOI: 10.1177/016224391244239
  12. Büscher B. (2012). The political economy of Africa’s natural resources and the’Great Financial Crisis’. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 103(2): 136-149.
  13. Castree N. (2002). False antitheses? Marxism, nature and actor‐networks. Antipode, 34(1): 111-146., DOI: 10.1111/1467-8330.0022
  14. Chakrabarty D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference-New Edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  15. Coole D., Frost S. (2010a). (Eds.) New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press
  16. Dardot P., Laval C. (2016). Guerra alla democrazia. L’offensiva dell’oligarchia neoliberista. Roma: DeriveApprodi.
  17. Deininger K., Byerlee D. (2011). Rising Global Interest in Farmland, Agriculture and Rural Development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  18. Dupire M. (1970). Organisation sociale des Peuls. Paris: Plon.
  19. Edelman M. (2013). Messy hectares: questions about the epistemology of land grabbing data. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 40(3): 485-501., DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2013.80134
  20. Edelman M.C., Oya S.M, Borras JR. (2013) Global Land Grabs: historical processes, theoretical and methodological implications and current trajectories. Third World Quarterly, 34:9, 1517-1531., DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2013.85019
  21. Ellis J.E., Swift D.M. (1988). Stability of African pastoral ecosystems: alternate paradigms and implications for development. Journal of Range Management Archives, 41: 450-459.
  22. ETC Group. (2010). The new biomassters: Synthetic biology and the next assault on biodiversity and livelihoods. ETC Group Communiqué, 104.
  23. Fairbairn M. (2014). “Like gold with yield”: Evolving intersections between farmland and finance. Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(5): 777-795., DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2013.87397
  24. Fairhead J., Leach M., Scoones I. (2012). Green grabbing: a new appropriation of nature? Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(2): 237-261., DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2012.67177
  25. Gareau J.B. (2005). We Have Never Been Human: Agential Nature, ANT, and Marxist Political Ecology. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 16(4): 127-140., DOI: 10.1080/1045575050037608
  26. Goven J., Pavone V. (2015). The bioeconomy as political project: A polanyian analysis. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(3): 302-337.
  27. Haraway D. (2015). Anthropocene, capitalocene, plantationocene, chthulucene: Making kin. Environmental humanities, 6(1): 159-165.
  28. Ignatova J.A. (2017). The’philanthropic’gene: biocapital and the new green revolution in Africa. Third World Quarterly 38(10): 2258-2275., DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2017.132246
  29. Komen J. (2016). “Africa Rising” to a sustainable future: Economic prospects of bio-economy development in eastern Africa. ILRI.
  30. Leonardi E. (2017). Lavoro, natura, valore: André Gorz tra marxismo e decrescita. Napoli: Orthotes
  31. Li T.M. (2018). After the land grab: Infrastructural violence and the “Mafia System” in Indonesia’s oil palm plantation zones. Geoforum, 96: 328-337.
  32. McMichael P. (2009). A food regime genealogy. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(1): 139-169., DOI: 10.1080/0306615090282035
  33. Mezzadra S. (2011). Bringing capital back in: a materialist turn in postcolonial studies? Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 12(1): 154-164., DOI: 10.1080/14649373.2011.53298
  34. Moore J.W. (2017). Antropocene o Capitalocene? Scenari di ecologia-mondo nell’era della crisi planetaria. Verona: Ombre corte.
  35. Nelson S.H. (2014) Resilience and the neoliberal counter-revolution: from ecologies of control to production of the common, Resilience: International Policies, Practices and Discourses, 2(1): 1-17., DOI: 10.1080/21693293.2014.87245
  36. Nolte K., Chamberlain W., Giger M. (2016). International Land Deals For Agriculture: Fresh Insights from the Land Matrix: Analytical Report II, IAD-CIRAD, IGAS, University of Pretoria. [online]
  37. Nori M., Taylor M., Sensi A. (2008). Droits pastoraux, modes de vie et adaptation au changement climatique. London: IIED.
  38. O’Connor M. (1994). The second contradiction of capitalism. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 5(4): 105-114., DOI: 10.1080/1045575940935861
  39. Patel R. (2013). The long green revolution. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 40(1): 1-63., DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2012.71922
  40. Pellizzoni L. (2016). Catching up with things? Environmental sociology and the material turn in social theory. Environmental Sociology, 2(4): 312-321.
  41. Pellizzoni L. (2016b). Ontological politics in a disposable world: the new mastery of nature. Routledge.
  42. Peterson C. (2011): The Posthumanism to Come, Angelaki. Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 16(2): 127-141., DOI: 10.1080/0969725X.2011.59159
  43. Sayes E. (2017). Marx and the critique of Actor-Network Theory: mediation, translation, and explanation, Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory., DOI: 10.1080/1600910X.2017.139048
  44. Smaller C., Mann H.L. (2009). A Thirst for Distant Lands: Foreign investment in agricultural land and water. Winnipeg: IISD.
  45. Taylor M. (2018). Climate-smart agriculture: what is it good for? The Journal of Peasant Studies, 45(1): 89-107., DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2017.131235
  46. Todd Z. (2014). Fish pluralities: Human-animal relations and sites of engagement in Paulatuuq, Arctic Canada. Etudes/Inuit/Studies, 38(1-2): 217-238., DOI: 10.7202/1028861
  47. Torre S. (2018). Contro la frammentazione. Perugia: Ombre Corte.
  48. Tourrand J.F. (2000). L’élevage dans la révolution agricole au Waalo, delta du fleuve Sénégal. CIRAD.
  49. Virgin I., Morris E.J. (Eds.). (2016). Creating Sustainable Bioeconomies: The Bioscience Revolution in Europe and Africa. Taylor & Francis.
  50. Upton C. (2014). The new politics of pastoralism: identity, justice and global activism. Geoforum, 54: 207-216.

Maura Benegiamo, in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 120/2019, pp. 62-76, DOI:10.3280/SUR2019-120005


FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche