Sulla compiutezza del De Intellectus Emendatione di Spinoza

Author/s Andrea Sangiacomo
Publishing Year 2010 Issue 2010/1 Language Italian
Pages 23 P. 1-23 File size 719 KB
DOI 10.3280/SF2010-001001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The Tractatus de intellectus emendatione was considered by a great part of scholars an incomplete work. In this essay, instead, the Author tries to explain how, on one hand, all is demanded by the method’s argument there’s in fact in the text, so its incomplete aspects are just formal, not about content. On the other hand, the theory, about the best knowledge of singular things should be deduced by the infinite order of ideas and eternal things, has many hard problems, because the infinite can’t be never totally known, and so adequately. That’s properly the aporia inside spinozism, and we can find it, at the best, in this first work.

Keywords: Spinoza, improvement, truth, adequacy, infinite, aporia.

Andrea Sangiacomo, Sulla compiutezza del De Intellectus Emendatione di Spinoza in "RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA" 1/2010, pp 1-23, DOI: 10.3280/SF2010-001001