Aristotle’s Analysis of Relatives

Author/s Enrico Rini
Publishing Year 2010 Issue 2010/4 Language Italian
Pages 34 P. 623-656 File size 767 KB
DOI 10.3280/SF2010-004001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This article discusses the ontological status of the parts of substances in Aristotle’s theory of categories. Since in this theory the substantial parts, as well as the wholes, are primary subjects of predication, i.e. substances, a part may be to its whole as Socrates is to Callias so that the mereological composition of substances can be regarded as an accident (a relation). It is argued here that in Cat. 7 Aristotle is trying to rule out this possibility by redefining the boundaries of the category of relatives itself. Starting from the framework of the Academic debate and then following closely the text of Cat. 7, the author provides a detailed reconstruction of Aristotle’s argument in order to establish the reason for which the parts of substances hold such an uncertain status. Furthermore, he shows that the Categories do not provide a definitive solution to the mereological problem, which has rather to be sought in the Metaphysics. The following results are attained: a moderately systematic component is revealed in Aristotle’s Categories and a mereological element is detected in the very core of his theory of substance.

Keywords: Aristotle, category, relation, substance, part, definition

  • Substances and Relatives in Aristotle's Categories (chapter 7) Maddalena Bonelli, in RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA 3/2018 pp.381
    DOI: 10.3280/SF2018-003001

Enrico Rini, L’analisi aristotelica dei relativi in "RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA" 4/2010, pp 623-656, DOI: 10.3280/SF2010-004001