I pesci e la loro acqua: come pazienti e terapeuta sperimentano il cambiamento attraverso un’esperienza di follow up

Author/s Laura Colangelo
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2013/103
Language Italian Pages 23 P. 9-31 File size 279 KB
DOI 10.3280/TF2013-103002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The author presents a qualitative follow up study on 8 systemic-oriented individual, marital and family psychotherapies. Patients and their therapist were interviewed separately in order to compare their ideas on outcomes and helpful factors.This paper focuses only on the outcomes identified by patients and therapist. The author maintains that the follow up is experienced according to a pattern which connects it to the previous negotiation process of terminating therapy and not as a separate and independent evaluation context. She argues that the follow up must be coherent with the systemic-constructionist perspective on change and should not reposition the person as a patient. These findings support the hypothesis that clients and therapist tend to identify the same important outcomes in psychotherapy, although the convergence on outcomes is stronger than convergence on explanations of how they are achieved. Though, patients’ idea of change results wider and more multifactorial than expected.

Keywords: Follow up, change, outcomes, patients and therapist’s perspective, qualitative research, IPA.

  1. Greco O. (2006). Il lavoro clinico con le famiglie complesse. Il test la Doppia Luna nella ricerca e nella terapia. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  2. Leiblich A., Tuval-Mashiach R., Zilber T. (1998). Narrative research: Reading, Analysis and Interpretation. London: Sage.
  3. Rautiainen E., Seikkula J. (2010). Focusing on therapists in co-research interviews: how do therapists see couple therapy? Journal of systemic therapies, 29, 3: 23-43.
  4. Ruggeri G., Picelli A., Picardi A., (2005). La valutazione del cambiamento terapeutico. Giornale italiano di Psicopatologia, 11.
  5. Smith J.A., Osborn M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In: Smith J.A., Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. London: Sage.
  6. Ugazio V., Fellin L., Pennacchio R., Negri A., Colciago F. (2010). L’ermeneutica triadica sistemica è davvero estranea al senso comune? Terapia Familiare, 92: 31-54.
  7. White M., Epson D. (1990). Literate Means to Therapeutic Ends. Adelaide: Dulwich Centre Publications.
  8. Andolfi M., Angelo C., D’Atena P. (2001). La terapia narrata dalle famiglie. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  9. Capps L., Bonanno G.A. (2000) Narrating Bereavement: Thematic and Grammatical Predictors of Adjustment to Loss. Discourse Processes, 30 (1).
  10. Colangelo L. (2008). Il follow up come momento di “reflecting team”. Connessioni, 21.
  11. Fruggeri L. (1990). Dalla individuazione di resistenze alla costruzione di differenze. Riflessione sui processi di persistenza e cambiamento in psicoterapia. Psicobiettivo, X (3).

Laura Colangelo, I pesci e la loro acqua: come pazienti e terapeuta sperimentano il cambiamento attraverso un’esperienza di follow up in "TERAPIA FAMILIARE" 103/2013, pp 9-31, DOI: 10.3280/TF2013-103002