Il senso del network. Le scienze sociali computazionali e la sfida dei Big Data

Journal title SALUTE E SOCIETÀ
Author/s Giovanni Boccia Artieri
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/3
Language Italian Pages 14 P. 25-38 File size 518 KB
DOI 10.3280/SES2014-003003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Content created by users online (UGC) is a new kind of research topic in the field of social sciences and it gives us particularly promising data. Defined as qualitative data, it is undeniable that being spontaneously created by the users for an unknown audience places them in a particular condition. In addition to it we have to consider the consequences, for the empirical research, of the ease with which those data are researched and found. This paper focuses on how Big Data are changing the way we are thinking and conducting the research. They lead us to the Computational Social science, which enables a transdisciplinary approach: a sociological observation of online social phenomena using methods of data managing and data collection borrowed from the computer science. As a consequence, we are able to analyze in depth a wide range of data as never before, facing a scenario rich both of opportunities and critical points to not understate. It is necessary, at this point, to keep clear in mind structures and affordances of the platforms, characteristics of the analyzed network, the relation between online conversations and social ties and in the end, all of the previous points have to be framed in a longitudinal perspective in order not to push down the data in an eternal present avoiding to consider their evolution over time.

Keywords: Computational social science, social network, User Generated Content, Big Data, Methodology

  1. Bakardjieva M. (2005). Internet Society. The Internet in Everyday life. London: Sage Publications
  2. Baym N.K. (1995). The emergence of community in computer-mediated communication.
  3. In: Jones S. G. (ed.), Cybersociety 2.0. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1998
  4. Boccia Artieri G. (2009). SuperNetwork: quando le vite sono connesse. In: Mazzoli L., a cura di, Network Effect. Quando la rete diventa pop. Torino: Codice Edizioni, pp. 21-40
  5. Boccia Artieri G. (2012). Stati di connessione. Pubblici, cittadini e consumatori nella (Social) Network Society. Milano: FrancoAngeli
  6. Boccia Artieri G. (2013). Un tweet non fa l’elettore. In: Diamanti I., a cura di, Un salto nel voto. Ritratto politico dell’Italia di oggi. Laterza, Roma-Bari, pp. 167-182
  7. boyd D. (2008). Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Public. PhD Dissertation, School of Information, University of California, Berkeley
  8. boyd d., Ellison N. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13, no. 1: 210-230. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.
  9. boyd D., Golder S., Lotan G. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspects of retweeting on twitter. System Sciences (HICSS), 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on. IEEE
  10. boyd D., Crawford K. (2012). Six Provocations for Big Data. Paper presented at Oxford Internet Institute’s “A Decade in Internet Time: Symposium on the Dynamics of the Internet and Society. Testo disponibile al sito (30/04/2014)
  11. Bruns A., Burgess J., Highfiled T. Kirchhoff, Nicolai T. (2011). Mapping the Australian networked public sphere. Social Science Computer Review, 29.3 (2011): 277-287. DOI: 10.1177/089443931038250
  12. Bruns A., Burgess J.E. (2011). The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. 6th European Consortium for Political Research General Conference, 25-27 August 2011, University of Iceland, Reykjavik
  13. Burgess J., Green J. (2009). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture, Cambridge: Polity Press (trad. it. Youtube. Milano: Egea, 2009)
  14. Castells M. (2009). Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (trad. it. Comunicazione e potere. Milano, Egea, 2009)
  15. Daas P.J.H., Puts M.J., Buelens B. et al. (2013). Big Data and official statistics. In: Paper for the 2013 NTTS conference, Brussels, Belgium, 5-7 March. Testo disponibile al sito (24/6/2014)
  16. Dutton W.H., Jeffreys P., Goldin I. (eds) (2010). World Wide Research: Reshaping the Sciences and Humanities. Cambridge: The MIT Press
  17. Ellison N.B., Steinfield C., Lampe C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer?Mediated Communication 12.4 (2007): 1143-1168. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.
  18. Gemini L. (2009). Stati di creatività diffusa: i social network e la deriva evolutiva della comunicazione artistica. In: Mazzoli L., a cura di, Network Effect. Quando la rete diventa pop. Torino: Codice Edizioni
  19. Giglietto F., Rossi L. (2012). Ethics and interdisciplinarity in computational social science. Methodological Innovations Online, 7 (1)
  20. Goel S., Hofman J.M., Lahaie S., Pennock D.M., and Watts D.J. Predicting consumer behavior with web search. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 7(41): 17486-17490, Sep 27 2010
  21. Hargittai E. (2000). Open portals or closed gates? Channeling content on the world wide web. Poetics, 27(4). Testo disponibile al sito /(30/04/2014)
  22. Hendler J., Shadbolt N., Hall W., Lee T.B., Weitzner D. (2008), Web science: an interdisciplinary approach to understanding the web. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 51, No. 7, pp. 60-69
  23. Hoadley C.H., Xu H., Lee J.J., Rosson M.B. (2010). Privacy as information access and illusory control: The case of the Facebook News Feed privacy outcry. Electronic commerce research and applications, 9.1 (2010): 50-60.
  24. Introna L.D., Nissenbaum H. (2000). Shaping the Web: Why the politics of search engines matters. The information society, 16, 169-185, DOI: 10.1080/0197224005013363
  25. Ito M., Baumer S., Bittanti M., boyd D., Cody R., Herr-Stephenson B., Horst H. A., Lange P.G., Mahendran D., Martinez K.Z., Pascoe C.J., Perkel D., Robinson
  26. L., Sims C., Tripp L. (2009). Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press Jenkins H., Ford S., Green J. Spreadable Media: Creating Value and Meaning in a Networked Culture. New York: New York University Press (trad. it. Spreadable media. I media tra condivisione, circolazione, partecipazione. Milano: Apogeo, 2013)
  27. Karakayali N., Kilic A. (2013). More Network Conscious than Ever? Challenges, strategies and analytic labor of users in the Facebook Environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 18, pp. 175-193. DOI: 10.1111/jcc4.1200
  28. Kazys V. (ed.) (2008). Networked Publics. Boston: MIT Press Lampe C., Ellison N.B., Steinfield C. (2008). Changes in use and perception of Facebook. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 2008. DOI: 10.1145/1460563.146067
  29. Lazer D., Pentland A., Adamic L., Aral S., Barabasi A.L., Brewer D., Christakis N., Lazer D., Pentland A., Adamic L., Aral S., Barabasi A.L., Brewer D., Christakis N., Contractor N., Fowler J., Gutmann M., Jebara T., King G., Macy
  30. Cheung P. (2012). Big Data, Official Statistics and Social Science Research: Emerging Data Challenges. Presentation at the December 19th World Bank meeting, Washington. Testo disponibile al sito (24/6/2014)
  31. M., Roy D., Van Alstyne M., Contractor N., Fowler J., Gutmann M., Je T., King G., Macy M., Roy D., Van Alstyne M. (2009). Social science. Computational social science. In Science (New York, NY), 323(5915), 721-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.116774
  32. Leydesdorff L. (2000). A Sociological Theory of Communication. Parkland, FL:
  33. Universal Publishers Magnani M., Montesi D., Rossi L. (2010). Friendfeed Breaking News: death of a public figure. Second IEEE International Conference on Social Computing. LOS ALAMITOS, USA: IEEE computer Society, pp. 528-533
  34. Manovich L. (2011). Trending: The Promises and the Challenges of Big Social Data. Testo disponibile al sito (30/4/2014)
  35. Recuero R., Amaral A., Monteiro C. (2012), Fandoms, trending topics and social capital in twitter. Selected Papers of Internet Research 2
  36. Ritzer G., Jurgenson N. (2010). Production, Consumption, Prosumption: The Nature of Capitalism in the Age of the Digital “Prosumer”. Journal of Consumer Culture, vol. 10, n. 1, pp. 13-36. DOI: 10.1177/146954050935467
  37. Srivastava J., Cooley R., Deshpande M., Tan P.N. (2000). Web usage mining: discovery and applications of usage patterns from Web data. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 1(2): 12-23
  38. Sutko D.M., Location-aware mobile media and urban sociability. New Media & Society, 13.5 (2011): 807-823. DOI: 10.1177/146144481038520
  39. Wellman B. (2004). The Three Ages of Internet Studies: Ten, Five and Zero Years Ago. In New Media & Society, 6(1): 123-129

  • Immagini per il presente. L'evento catastrofico nei Twitter online (visual) data Giovanni Boccia Artieri, Laura Gemini, Manolo Farci, Elisabetta Zurovac, in SOCIOLOGIA DELLA COMUNICAZIONE 49/2015 pp.55
    DOI: 10.3280/SC2015-049005

Giovanni Boccia Artieri, Il senso del network. Le scienze sociali computazionali e la sfida dei Big Data in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 3/2014, pp 25-38, DOI: 10.3280/SES2014-003003