Le Web survey. Aspetti metodologici per una ricerca di qualità

Journal title SALUTE E SOCIETÀ
Author/s Linda Lombi
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/3 Language Italian
Pages 16 P. 39-54 File size 524 KB
DOI 10.3280/SES2014-003004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Web surveys are becoming a more and more spread tools in many research fields, included the health area. Factors such as the availability of new software, the reduction of digital divide, and the widespread of mobile devices have encouraged social researchers to implement web surveys. Researchers must be particularly attentive to their methodological choices to ensure that instruments can collect valid and reliable data. The implications of the various survey mode choices from the methodological, technical and ethical point of views are discussed to suggest the best practices and guidelines to implement web surveys.

Keywords: Cawi, health, quantified self, web society, web survey, e-methods

  1. Bethlehem J., Biffignandi S. (2012). Handbook of Web Surveys. New Jersey: Wiley Best S.J., Brian S.K. (2008). Internet Survey Design. In: Fielding N., Lee R.M., Blank R., eds., The Sage Handbook of Online Research Methods. Sage, London: 217-235
  2. Braithwaite D., Emery J., De Lusignan S., Sutton S. (2003). Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative? Family Practice. Vol. 20, No. 5: 545-551, DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmg50
  3. Christian L.M. e Dillman D.A. (2004). The influence of symbolic and graphical language manipulations on answers to self-administered questionnaires. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68: 57-80, DOI: 10.1093/poq/nfh004CipollaC.,acuradi(1998).Ilciclometodologicodellaricercasociale.FrancoAngeli:Milan
  4. Cipolla C., De Lillo A., Ruspini E., a cura di (2012). Il sociologo, le sirene e gli avatar. FrancoAngeli: Milano
  5. Cipolla C., Lombi L. (2013). Post-fazione. Mixed research ed e-methods: una prospettiva quasi obbligata verso il futuro. In: Cipriani R., Cipolla C., Losacco G., a cura di, La ricerca qualitativa fra tecniche tradizionali e e-method. Milano: FrancoAngeli: 236-252
  6. Cipolla C., Maturo A., a cura di (2014). Sociologia della salute e web society. Milano: FrancoAngeli
  7. Corposanto C. (2002). Il ciclo statistico della ricerca sociale. Milano: FrancoAngeli
  8. Corposanto C., Valastro A. (2014). Una questione di metodo. In: Corposanto C.,
  9. Valastro A., a cura di, Blog, Fb e TW. Fare ricerca quali-quantitativa online. Milano: Giuffrè
  10. Corposanto C., Molinari B. (2014). Survey e questionari online. In: Corposanto C., Valastro A., a cura di, op. cit.
  11. Couper M.P. (2000). Web surveys – A review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64: 464-494
  12. Denscombe M. (2006). Web-Based Questionnaires and the Mode Effect: An Evaluation Based on Completion Rates and Data Contents of Near-Identical Questionnaires Delivered in Different Modes. Social Science Computer Review, 24(2): 246-254. DOI: 10.1177/089443930528452
  13. Dillman D. A., Phelps G., Tortora R., Swift K., Kohrell J., Berck J. e Messer B. L. (2009). Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet. Social Science Research, 38(1): 1-18, DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2008.03.00
  14. Tourangeau R., Couper M.P., Steiger D.M. (2003). Humanizing self-administered surveys: Experiments on social presence in web and IVR surveys. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 1-24, DOI: 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00032-
  15. Vicente P., Reis E. (2010). Using Questionnaire Design to Fight Nonresponse Bias in Web Surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 28(2), 251-267, DOI: 10.1177/089443930934075
  16. Zuidgeest M., Hendriks M., Koopman L., Spreeuwenberg P., Rademakers J. (2011). A Comparison of a Postal Survey and Mixed-Mode Survey Using a Questionnaire on Patients’ Experiences With Breast Care. J Med Internet Res, Sep 27; 13(3): e68, DOI: 10.2196/jmir.124
  17. Rolfson O., Salomonsson R., Dahlberg L.E., Garellick G. (2011). Internet-Based Follow-Up Questionnaire for Measuring Patient-Reported Outcome after Total Hip Replacement Surgery-Reliability and Response Rate. Value in Health, Vole lume 14, Issue 2, March-April 2011: 316-321, DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.08.00
  18. Rogers R. (2013). Digital Methods. Cambridge: The MIT Press
  19. Niero M. (2008). La personalizzazione nella ricerca quantitativa. Milano: FrancoAngeli
  20. Naithani P. (2012). Guidelines for developing a robust web survey. Advances in Information Technology and Management, 1(1), 20-23
  21. Moruzzi M. (2012), L’azienda ad Alta Comunicazione. Reti, fascicoli elettronici, emozioni e de-materializzazioni. Milano: FrancoAngeli
  22. Maturo A. (2012), La società bionica. Saremo sempre più belli, felici e artificiali? Milano: FrancoAngeli
  23. Maturo A. (2007). Sociologia della malattia. Un’introduzione. Milano: FrancoAngeli
  24. Manfreda K.L., Bosnjak M., Berzelak J., Haas I. e Vehovar V. (2008). Web surveys versus other survey modes. International Journal of Market Research, 50: 79-104
  25. Lupton D. (2013). Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Critical Public Health, 23: 4: 393-403, DOI: 10.1080/09581596.2013.79493
  26. Kaczmirek L. (2008). Internet Survey Software. In: Fielding N., Lee R.M., Blank R. eds., The Sage Handbook of Online Research Methods. Sage, London: 236-254
  27. Heerwegh D., Loosveldt G. (2002). An Evaluation of the Effect of Response Formats on Data Quality in Web Surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 20(4): 471-484, DOI: 10.1177/08944393000180040
  28. Greene J., Speizer H. e Wiitala W. (2008). Telephone and web: mixed-mode challenge. Health services research, 43 (1 Pt 1), 230-48, DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00747.
  29. Goritz A.S. (2006). Incentives in web studies: Methodological issues and a review. International Journal of Internet Science, 1: 58-70, DOI: 10.1177/0893930202000300
  30. Giarelli for the European Society for Health and Medical Sociology, eds. (2010). Comparative Research Methodologies in Health and Medical Sociology. Salute e Società, suppl. n. 2, IX
  31. Ganassali S. (2008). The Influence of the Design of Web Survey Questionnaires on the Quality of Responses. Survey Research Methods, 2(1): 21-32.
  32. Fuchs M. (2009). Differences in the Visual Design Language of Paper-and-Pencil Surveys Versus Web Surveys: A Field Experimental Study on the Length of Response Fields in Open-Ended Frequency Questions. Social Science Computer Review, 27(2), 213-227, DOI: 10.1177/089443930832520
  33. Frippiat D., Marquis N. (2010). Web Survey in the Social Sciences: An Overview. Population-E, 65 (2), 285-312, DOI: 10.3917/pope.1002.028
  34. Fricker R.D. (2008). Sampling Methods for Web and E-mail Surveys. In: Fielding N., Lee R.M., Blank R., eds., The Sage Handbook of Online Research Methods. Sage, London: 195-216
  35. Eysenbach G., Wyatt J. (2002), Using the Internet for Surveys and health research. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 4(2): e13, DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4.2.e13FanW.eYanZ.(2010).ComputersinHumanBehaviorFactorsaffectingresponseratesofthewebsurvey:Asystematicreview.ComputersinHumanBehavior,26(2):132-139,doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.01
  36. Eynon R., Fry J., Schroeder R. (2008). The Ethics of Internet research. In: Fielding N., Lee R.M., Blank R., eds., The Sage Handbook of Online Research Methods. Sage, London: 23-41

  • Sport e devianza: uno studio esplorativo sul consumo di farmaci nello sport amatoriale Rosalba Altopiedi, Daniele Scarscelli, in SOCIOLOGIA DEL DIRITTO 3/2017 pp.185
    DOI: 10.3280/SD2017-003008

Linda Lombi, Le Web survey. Aspetti metodologici per una ricerca di qualità in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 3/2014, pp 39-54, DOI: 10.3280/SES2014-003004