Local players’ perceptions of geographical indications: a case study of pelotas sweets in southern Brazil

Author/s Andrea Cristina Dorr, Jaqueline Carla Guse, Marivane Vestena Rossato
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/3 Language English
Pages 13 P. 13-25 File size 170 KB
DOI 10.3280/ECAG2014-003003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The adoption of a Geographical Indication (gi) represents, among other things, a way of innovation and market advantage. As only a few, relatively recent studies have investigated this topic in Brazil, this research aims to verify the historical, cultural and economic perceptions of consumers and producers involved in the production chain of Pelotas sweets in relation to the adoption of gi. The case study was investigated through field research with primary data collection from 138 consumers and three case studies with producers who participated in the 21st fenadoce fair, in the city of Pelotas-RS, between May 31st and June 2nd, 2013. The findings reveal that consumers identify the Pelotas gi with the region of Pelotas. Pelotas gi sweets are recognized by consumers thanks to their alluring appearance, smell, taste and texture. We conclude that consumers have become more convinced about consuming a product which maintains the characteristics of its original recipes and, more than anything, the unmistakable flavor of Pelotas sweets.

Keywords: Geographical Indication, Pelotas Sweets, innovation

Jel codes: Q13, Q17, D12

  1. Amilien, V., Fort, F. & Ferras, N. (2007). Hyper-real territories and urban markets: changing conventions for local food – case studies from France and Norway. Anthropology of food [Online], March. Associaçao de produtores de doces de pelotas. Available in: www.docesdepelotas.org.br/ Accessed: 15 out. 2012.
  2. Brasil. Lei 9279, de 14 de maio de 1996. Regula direitos e obrigaçoes relativos a propriedade industrial. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF, 15 mai. 1996. Canada, J.S. & Vázquez, A.M. (2005). Quality certification, institutions and innovation in local agro-food systems: protected designations of origin of Olive Oil in Spain. Journal of Rural Studies, 21(4), 475-486. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.10.001
  3. Dörr, A.C. & Grote, U. (2009). The role of certification in the Brazilian fruit sector. Revista de Economia Contemporânea, 13, 539-571. DOI: 10.1590/S1415-98482009000300007
  4. Ferreira, M.L.M. & Cerqueira, F.V. Mulheres e doces: o saber-fazer na cidade de Pelotas. Patrimônio e Memória, Sao Paulo, Unesp, 8(1), 255-277. jan./jun. 2012.Available in: www.igtf.rs.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/mulheres-e-doces-osaber-fazer-na-cidade-de-pelotas-2.pdf. Acessed: 16 dez. 2013.
  5. Giesbrecht, H.O., Schwanke, F.H. & Müssnich, A.G. (2011). Indicaçoes geográficas brasileiras. Brasília: sebrae, inpi.
  6. Gil, A. C. (2002). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. Sao Paulo: Atlas.
  7. Glass, R.F. & Castro, A.M.G. (2008). As indicaçoes geográficas como estratégia mercadológica para vinhos. Organizações Rurais & Agroindustriais, Lavras, 10(2), 189-202.
  8. inpi. Instituto Nacional de Propriedade Industrial (2013). Guia básico – indicação geográfica. Available in: www.inpi.gov.br/portal/artigo/guia_basico_indicacao_geografica. Acessed: 24 jan. 2013.
  9. Matthiesen, U. (2003). Esskultur und Regionale Entwicklung – unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von, Mark und Metropole“: Strukturskizzen zu einem Forschungsfeld. Antrittsvorlesung 27. Mai 2003. In: Berlin Blätter. Ethnographische und Ethnologische Beiträge 34, 111-145.
  10. Ngokkuen, C. & Grote, U. (2012). Geographical indication for Jasmine Rice: applying a logit model to predict adoption behavior of Thai Farm Households. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 51(2), 157-185.
  11. Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
  12. Sidali, K.L., Fuchs, M. & Spiller, A. (2012). The Effect of E-Reviews on Consumer Behaviour – An Exploratory Study on Agro-Tourism. In: Sigala, M., Gretzel, U. & Vangelis, R. (Eds.), Web 2.0 in Travel, Tourism and Hospitality: Theory, Practices and Cases. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Ltd, pp. 239-256.
  13. Sidali, K.L. & Schulze, B. (2010). Current and future trends in consumers’ preference for farm tourism in Germany. Leisure/Loisir, Journal of the Canadian Association for Leisure Studies, 34(2), 207-222.
  14. Sidali, K.L., Dorr, A.C., Zulian, A. & Radic, I. (2013). How do Slow Food members perceive gi-regimes? Evidence from Germany, Italy and Brazil. Working Paper of the Göttingen Interdisciplinary Research Group on Cultural Property, v. 101, n. 5, p. 1-10, 2013.
  15. Valente, M.E.R., Perez, R., Ramos, A.M. & Chaves, J.B.P. (2012). Indicaçao geográfica de alimentos e bebidas no Brasil e na Uniao Europeia. Ciência Rural, 42(3), 551-558. DOI: 10.1590/S0103-84782012000300027

Andrea Cristina Dorr, Jaqueline Carla Guse, Marivane Vestena Rossato, Local players’ perceptions of geographical indications: a case study of pelotas sweets in southern Brazil in "ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE" 3/2014, pp 13-25, DOI: 10.3280/ECAG2014-003003