Viennese consumers’ preferences and willingness to pay for raspberries from Arilje, Serbia

Author/s Ivana Radic, Maurizio Canavari
Publishing Year 2014 Issue 2014/3 Language English
Pages 16 P. 27-42 File size 136 KB
DOI 10.3280/ECAG2014-003004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Raspberries from Serbia have a good reputation and those from Arilje are protected by a geographical indication registration within the state of Serbia. Recently, producers and other stakeholders have been considering promoting this Geographical indication (gi) produce outside of Serbia, and Austria is one of the main target markets. The export of fresh raspberries is, generally speaking, only in its initial phase, and protecting raspberries from Arilje by geographical indication also in the eu is seen as a good opportunity for the whole western area of the country. It is widely recognized that gi labels may work as a quality signal for food products and may be useful to build trust among consumers. In this study, we aim at evaluating the role of a gi label in shaping consumer purchase intentions, using a conjoint choice experiment approach. The attributes we considered were price, punnet size, geographical indications of origin (from major production areas in Serbia, Poland, and Spain), and method of production (organic, integrated crop management). A survey were administered to a sample of 235 consumers in Vienna. The probability of choice was modeled using a discrete choice approach that allowed us to quantify consumers’ preference for different attributes and levels, as well as willingness to pay for raspberries from Arilje, Serbia compared to other areas of origin. Our results suggest that Viennese consumers have a positive attitude towards raspberries from Arilje, Serbia and they are, coeteris paribus, willing to pay more for them compared to other foreign areas of origin. However, willingness to pay is slightly higher for organic raspberries than for gi labeled raspberries. This could imply that a combination of strategies, rather than focusing on gi labeling only, may be more beneficial for Serbian producers.

Keywords: Raspberries, willingness to pay, geographical indications

Jel codes: Q13, Q17, D12

  1. Alma Mater Studiorum-University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy-Bioagrico-op scrl, Casalecchio di Reno (BO), Italy-Thai-Italian Chamber of Commerce, Bangkok, Thailand.
  2. Agrarmarkt Austria (2011). Marktbericht Obst und Gemüse. Wien: Agrarmarkt
  3. Austria. Aprile, M.C., Caputo, V. & Nayga Jr. R.M. (2012). Consumers‘ valuation of food quality labels: the case of the European geographic indication and organic farming labels. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36(2), 158-165. DOI: 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01092.x
  4. Arfini, F., Belletti, G. & Marescotti, A. (2010). Prodotti tipici e denominazioni geografiche: strumenti di tutela e valorizzazione. Tellus.
  5. Bilkey, W.J. & Nes, E. (1982). Country-of-origin effects on product evaluations. Journal of international business studies, 89-99. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490539
  6. Burgess, L. & Street, D.J. (2005). Optimal designs for choice experiments with asymmetric attributes. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 134(1), 288-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2004.03.021
  7. Canavari, M., Galanti, G., Haas, R. & Wongprawmas, R. (2010). Geographical indications: Outlook on the European and Thai systems and overview of eu gatekeepers perceptions towards gi fruit and coffee products proceeding from Thailand.
  8. Croissant, Y. (2011). mlogit: multinomial logit model. R package version 0.2-2.
  9. Croissant, Y. (2012). Estimation of multinomial logit models in R: The mlogit Packages. R package version 0.2-2. url:
  10. Dekhili, S. & d’Hauteville, F. (2009). Effect of the region of origin on the perceived quality of olive oil: An experimental approach using a control group. Food Quality and Preference, 20(7), 525-532. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.05.00
  11. Giovannucci, D., Josling, T.E., Kerr, W., O’Connor, B. & Yeung, M.T. (2009). Guide to geographical indications: linking products and their origins. International Trade Centre.
  12. Lagerkvist, C.J., Berthelsen, T., Sundström, K. & Johansson, H. (2014). Country of origin or eu/non-eu labelling of beef? Comparing structural reliability and validity of discrete choice experiments for measurement of consumer preferences for origin and extrinsic quality cues. Food Quality and Preference, 34, 50-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.12.009
  13. Lancaster, K.J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. The journal of political economy, 132-157. DOI: 10.1086/259131
  14. Lukovic´, R., Petrovic´, S., Roganovic´, D. & Petrovic´, M. (2008). Elaborat o nacˇinu proizvodnje i specificˇnim karakteristikama proizvoda, Opšte udruženje preduzetnika opštine Arlije, Opština Arilje Study on the method of production and the specific characteristics of the product, General Association of Entrepreneurs municipality Arlije.
  15. Lusk, J.L. & Shogren, J.F. (2007). Experimental auctions: Methods and applications in economic and marketing research. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511611261
  16. McFadden, D. (1972). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior (No. 10).
  17. Mišic´, P., Tešovic´, Ž., Stanisavljevic´, M., Milutinovic´, M., Nikolic´, M. & Milenkovic´, S. (2004). Malina u Srbiji i Crnoj Gori – prošlost, sadašnjost i buduc´nost, Jugoslovensko voc´arstvo, 38, 145-146. Raspberry in Serbia and Montenegro-past, present and future, Yugoslav Pomology, 38, 145-146. Mtimet, N., Zaibet, L., Zairi, C. & Hzami, H. (2013). Marketing olive oil products in the Tunisian local market: The importance of quality attributes and consumers’ behavior. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 25(2), 134-145. DOI: 10.1080/08974438.2013.736044
  18. Orme, B.K. (2006). Getting started with conjoint analysis: Strategies for product design and pricing research.
  19. Pagliuca, M.M. & Scarpato, D. (2011). Food quality, consumer perception and preferences: an analysis on olive oil. Electronic Journal of Applied Statistical Analysis, 4(2), 215-226.
  20. Profeta, A., Balling, R. & Roosen, J. (2012). The relevance of origin information at the point of sale. Food Quality and Preference, 26(1), 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.03.001
  21. Radosavljevic´, K. (2008). The market chain of fruit production in Serbia: A case study of raspberry and sour cherry cultivation. Ekonomski anali, 53(177), 103-121. DOI: 10.2298/EKA0877103R
  22. R Development Core Team (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, url:
  23. Regulation (eu) No. 1151 (2012). Regulation (eu) No. 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs. Official Journal L 343/1, 14.12.2012.
  24. Sahota, A. (2009). The global market for organic food & drink. The World of Organic Agriculture, Statistics and Emerging Trends. Sahota, A. (2010). The global market for organic food and drink. Training Manuals for Organic Agriculture, 54.
  25. Scozzafava, G., Casini, L. & Contini, C. (2014). Analysis of Italian consumer preferences for beef. New medit: Mediterranean journal of economics, agriculture and environment= Revue méditerranéenne d’economie, agriculture et environment, 13(1), 66-72.
  26. Train, K.E. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511805271
  27. Vandecandelaere, E., Arfini, F., Belletti, G. & Marescotti, A. (2009). Linking people, places and products. A guide for promoting quality linked to geographical origin and sustainable geographical indications. Rome, Viale Terme di Caracalla, 153.
  28. Van Wezemael, L., Caputo, V., Nayga Jr, R.M., Chryssochoidis, G. & Verbeke, W. (2014). European consumer preferences for beef with nutrition and health claims: A multi-country investigation using discrete choice experiments. Food Policy, 44, 167-176. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.11.006
  29. Willer, H. & Kilcher, L. (2009). The World of Organic Agriculture–statistics and emerging trends 2009. IFOAM and FiBL (Vol. 100). ISBN 3-940946-12-6. Annex 1. Summary table of the chain substitution analysis me. unit: thousand HUF Model Subsidy level Capacity A I. II. III. IV. V. B I. II. III. IV.

  • Prodotti agroalimentari e segni distintivi di qualità. Dimensione economica dei prodotti contrassegnati da marchi dop/igp in forza delle normative comunitarie e strategie di valorizzazione Claudio Bellia, G. Fabiola Safonte, in ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE 1/2015 pp.81
    DOI: 10.3280/ECAG2015-001005
  • Consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay for integrated production label on common beans Aluisio Goulart Silva, Maurizio Canavari, Alcido Elenor Wander, in ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE 1/2018 pp.11
    DOI: 10.3280/ECAG2018-001002
  • Individual customers characteristics and types of organic food Milica Čolović, Vladimir Mitić, in Acta agriculturae Serbica /2023 pp.97
    DOI: 10.5937/AASer2356097C

Ivana Radic, Maurizio Canavari, Viennese consumers’ preferences and willingness to pay for raspberries from Arilje, Serbia in "ECONOMIA AGRO-ALIMENTARE" 3/2014, pp 27-42, DOI: 10.3280/ECAG2014-003004