Architectural features and social changes in gentrifying Prenzlauer Berg, Berlin

Journal title TERRITORIO
Author/s Federica Amoruso
Publishing Year 2015 Issue 2015/73
Language English Pages 9 P. 14-22 File size 276 KB
DOI 10.3280/TR2015-073003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Il dibattito accademico sulla gentrification si è principalmente interessato degli aspetti socioeconomici del fenomeno. Ma come si trasforma lo spazio e l’estetica del quartiere all’arrivo di un nuovo gruppo sociale? Il contributo di questo testo è quello di analizzare i cambiamenti sociali in relazione alle trasformazioni del costruito nel quartiere e di dimostrare che l’omogeneità dei gentrifiers si riflette sugli aspetti architettonici ed estetici, causando omogeneità spaziale ed estetica. Questa lettura del processo di gentrification viene applicata sul quartiere di Prenzlauer Berg, a Berlino, e intende approfondire il fenomeno di displacement dei gruppi squatters dovuto al processo di gentrification

Keywords: Gentrification; architettura; Berlino

  1. Abel C., 1997, Architecture and Identity, Architectural Press, Oxford.
  2. Atkinson R., 1986, «The Hidden Costs of Gentrification: Displacement in Central London», in Smith N., Williams P. (eds.), Gentrification in the City, Allen & Unwin, Boston, pp. 178 -200.
  3. Bourdieu P., 1984, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste, Harvard U.P., Cambridge, Mass.
  4. Bernt M., 2012, «The ‘Double Movements’ of Neighbourhood Change: Gentrification and Public Policy in
  5. Harlem and Prenzlauer Berg», Urban Studies, vol. 49, n. 14, pp. 3045-3062. DOI: 10.1177/0042098012437746
  6. Bernt M., Holm A., 2005, «Exploring the Substance and Style of Gentrification », in Atkinson R., Bridge G. (eds.), Gentrification in a Global Context. The new urban colonialism, Routledge, London, pp. 106-120.
  7. Bent M., Holm A., 2005, «Gentrification of a Particular Type. The Case of Prenzlauer Berg», in Atkinson R., Bridge G. (eds.), Gentrification in a Global Perspective, Blackwell, London, pp. 106-125.
  8. Bent M., Holm A., 2009, «Is it or is it not? The Conceptualisation of Gentrification and Displacement and its Political Implications in the Case of Berlin-Prenzlauer Berg», City Special Issue, vol. 13, n. 2-3, pp. 312-324. DOI: 10.1080/13604810902982268
  9. Bridge G., 2001, «Estate Agents as Interpreters of Economic and Cultural Capital: The Gentrification Premium in Sydney House Market», International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 25, n. 1, pp. 87-101. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00299
  10. Connolly K., 2012, «Berlin’s Oldest Squatters in Town Defend Threatened Community Centre», The Guardian (; accessed 22/2/ 2015).
  11. Drissel D., 2011, «Anarchist Punks Resisting Gentrification: Countercultural Contestations of Space in the New Berlin», The International Journal of the Humanities, vol. 8, n. 10, pp. 19-44.
  12. Emms S., 2009, «Two Decades of Clubbing in Berlin, City of the Night», The Guardian (; accessed 22/2/ 2015).
  13. Foucault M., 1984, Space, Knowledge and Power, Pantheon, New York.
  14. Glass R., 1964, London: Aspects of Change, Centre for Urban Studies, London.
  15. Hensher P., 2013, «Bohemia has Fallen to the Bankers», The Independent (; accessed 22/2/2015).
  16. Holm A., 2006, «Urban Renewal and the End of Social Housing: The Roll Out of Neoliberalism in East Berlin’s Prenzlauer Berg: Urban Renewal, Urban Policy and Modes of Regulation», Social Justice, vol. 33, n. 3, pp. 114-132.
  17. Holm A., Kuhn A., 2010, «Squatting and Urban Renewal: The Interaction of Squatter Movements and Strategies of Urban Restructuring in Berlin », International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 33, n. 3, pp. 644-658. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.001009.x
  18. Huron A.M., 2002, Gentrification and Individualization: The Case of Fehrbelliner Strasse 6, Unpublished Master thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
  19. Jager M., 1986, «Class Definition and the Esthetics of Gentrification: Victoriana in Melbourne», Gentrification of the City, vol. 9, n. 2, pp. 223- 232.
  20. Japha D.V., 1991, «Identity Through Detail: Architectural and Cultural Aspiration in Montagu, South Africa, 1850-1915», Tdsr, vol. 2, n. 1, pp. 7-33.
  21. Katz S., Mayer M., 1985, «Gimme Shelter: Self-help Housing Struggles within and Against the State», International Journal of urban and Regional Research , vol. 9, n. 1, pp. 15-47. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.1985.tb00419.x
  22. Lees L., 2008, «Gentrification and Social Mixing: Towards an Inclusive Urban Renaissance?», Urban Studies , vol. 45, n. 12, pp. 2449-2470. DOI: 10.1177/0042098008097099
  23. Levine M.A., 2004, «Government Policy, the Local State and Gentrification: The Case of Prenzlauer Berg (Berlin), Germany», Journal of Urban Affairs, vol. 26, n. 1, pp. 89-108. DOI: 10.1111/j.0735-2166.2004.007.x
  24. Lynch K., 1964, L’immagine della città, Marsilio, Venezia.
  25. Mayer M., 2003, «The ‘Career’ of Urban Social Movements in German Cities», in Fisher R., Kling J. (eds.), Mobilizing the Community: Local Politics in a Global Era, Sage, Newbury Park.
  26. Marcuse P., 1986, «Abandonment, Gentrification and Displacement: The Linkages in New York City», in Smith N., Williams P. (eds.), Gentrification of the City, Allen & Unwin, Boston, pp. 153-177.
  27. Massey D., 1994, Space, Place and Gender, Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.
  28. Massey D., 2005, For Space, Sage Publications, London.
  29. Mc Kay G., 1998, DiY Culture. Party & Protest in Nineties Britain, Verso, London.
  30. Niessen B.M., 2009, Going Commercial. L’integrazione degli artisti underground a Milano e Berlino, Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Milano-Bicocca.
  31. Norberg-Shulz C., 1979, Genius Loci: paesaggio, ambiente, architettura, Electa, Milan.
  32. Pidd H., 2011, «Berlin Police Mount Huge Operation to Evict Tenants of Former Squat», The Guardian (; accessed 22/2/ 2015).
  33. Smith N., 1979, «Toward a Theory of Gentrification: A Back to the City Movement by Capital, Not People», Journal of American Planning Association, vol. 45, n. 4, pp.538-48. DOI: 10.1080/01944367908977002
  34. Pruijt H., 2004, «Okupar en Europa», in Lopez M.M., Adell R., (eds), ¿Dónde están las llaves? El movimiento okupa: prácticas y contextos sociales (; accessed 22/2/ 2015).
  35. Urban F., 2007, «Designing the Past in East Berlin Before and After the German Reunification», Progress in Planning, vol. 68, n. 1, pp. 1-55.
  36. Van Heerden S., Bontje M., 2013, «What About Culture for the Ordinary Workforce? A Study of the Locational Preferences of the Creative Class in Prenzluaer Berg, Berlin», Journal of Urban Affairs, vol. 36, n. 3, pp. 465-481. DOI: 10.1111/juaf.12048
  37. Van Heur B., 2009, «The Clustering of Creative Networks: Between Myth and Reality», Urban Studies, vol. 46, n. 8, pp. 1531- 1152. DOI: 10.1177/004209800910550
  38. Wates N., 1980, Squatting, The Real Story, Bay Leaf Books, London

Federica Amoruso, Architectural features and social changes in gentrifying Prenzlauer Berg, Berlin in "TERRITORIO" 73/2015, pp 14-22, DOI: 10.3280/TR2015-073003