The Relational Attitude in Gestalt Therapy Theory and Practice

Author/s Gary Yontef
Publishing Year 2016 Issue 2015/1
Language Italian Pages 19 P. 111-129 File size 108 KB
DOI 10.3280/GEST2015-001009
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Gestalt therapy theory is relational in its core, although some talk and practice of Gestalt therapy is not consistent with the principles. This paper reviews core relational philosophical principles of Gestalt therapy: existential phenomenology, field theory, and dialogic existentialism. The implications for practice are explored. Practices and attitudes about Gestalt therapy that are inconsistent with these principles are discussed. The article studies the triggering and treatment of shame in Gestalt therapy and Gestalt training. The article clarifies what relational Gestalt therapy is and what it is not.

Keywords: Bracketing, dialogue, field theory, individualism and interdependence, metatheory, phenomenology, relational Gestalt therapy, shame, subtext, therapeutic relationship

  1. Aron L. (1996). A Meeting of Minds: Mutuality in Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press (trad. it.: Menti che si incontrano. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore, 2004).
  2. Beisser A. (1970). The Paradoxical Theory of Change. In: Fagan J., Shepherd I.L., eds., Gestalt Therapy Now: Theory, Techniques, Applications. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books, 77-80.
  3. Husserl E. (1931). Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. New York: Macmillan.
  4. Hycner R., (1988) Between Person and Person: Toward a Dialogical Psychotherapy. Highland, New York: The Gestalt Journal Press.
  5. Hycner R., Jacobs L. (1995). The Healing Relationship in Gestalt Therapy: A Dialogic/Self Psychology Approach. Highland, New York: The Gestalt Journal Press.
  6. Jacobs L. (1989). Dialogue in Gestalt Theory and Therapy. The Gestalt Journal, 12, 1: 25-67.
  7. Jacobs L. (1992). Insights from Psychoanalytic Self-Psychology and Intersubjectivity Theory for Gestalt Therapists. The Gestalt Journal, 15, 2: 25-60.
  8. Jacobs L. (1998). Optimal Responsiveness and Subject-Subject Relating. In: Bacal H.A., ed., Optimal Responsiveness: How Therapists Heal Their Patients. Northvale, NJ, & London: Jason Aronson, 191-212.
  9. Koffka K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt Psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
  10. Lee R., Wheeler G., eds. (1996). The Voice of Shame: Silence and Connection in Psychotherapy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  11. Lewin K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. New York: Harper.
  12. Mautner T. (2000). The Penguin Dictionary of Philosophy. New York: Penguin Books.
  13. McNamee S., Gergen, K.J., eds. (1999). Relational Responsibility: Resources for Sustainable Dialogue. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
  14. Miller M. (1995). Intimate Terrorism: The Deterioration of Erotic Life. New York: Norton.
  15. Mitchell A. (1988). Relational Concepts in Psychoanalysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (trad. it.: Gli orientamenti relazionali in psicoanalisi. Per un modello integrato. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri, 1993).
  16. Mitchell A., Aron L. (1999). Relational Psychoanalysis: The Emergence of a Tradition. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  17. Perls F., Hefferline H., Goodman P. (1951). Gestalt Therapy: Excitement and Growth in the Human Personality. New York: The Julian Press (trad. it.: Teoria e pratica della terapia della Gestalt. Roma: Astrolabio, 1997).
  18. Spinelli E. (1989). The Interpreted World. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  19. Staemmler F.-M. (1993). Therapeutische Beziehung und Diagnose: Gestalttherapeutische Antworten. München: Pfeiffer.
  20. Staemmler F.-M. (1997). Cultivated Uncertainty: An Attitude for Gestalt Therapists. British Gestalt Journal, 6, 1: 40-48.
  21. Stolorow R., Brandschaft B., Atwood G. (1987). Psychoanalytic Treatment: An Intersubjective Approach. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  22. Wertheimer M. (1945). Productive Thinking. New York: Harper & Row (trad. it.: Il pensiero produttivo. Firenze: Giunti, 1965).
  23. Wheeler G. (1996). Self and Shame: A New Paradigm for Psychotherapy. In: Lee R., Wheeler G., eds., The Voice of Shame: Silence and Connection in Psychotherapy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass, 23-60.
  24. Yontef G.M. (1993). Awareness, Dialogue and Process: Essays on Gestalt Therapy. Highland, NY: Gestalt Journal Press. Yontef G.M. (1997a). Supervision from a Gestalt Therapy Perspective. In: Watkins C.E., ed., Handbook of Psychotherapy Supervision. New York: John Wiley, 147-163 (Edited version: Yontef G.M. Supervision from Gestalt Therapy Perspective. British Gestalt Journal, 1996, 5, 2: 92-102).
  25. Yontef G.M. (1997b). Relationship and Sense of Self in Gestalt Therapy Training. The Gestalt Journal, 20, 1: 17-48.
  26. Yontef G.M. (1998). Dialogic Gestalt Therapy. In: Greenberg L., Lietaer G., Watson J., eds., Handbook of Experiential Psychotherapy. New York: Guilford, 82-102.
  27. Yontef G.M. (1999). Preface to the German Edition of “Awareness, Dialogue and Process”. The Gestalt Journal, 22, 1: 9-20.
  28. Yontef G.M. (2001). Psychotherapy of Schizoid Processes. Transactional Analysis Journal, 31, 1: 7-23.
  29. Yontef G.M. (2002). The Relational Attitude in Gestalt Therapy Theory and Practice. International Gestalt Journal, 25, 1: 15-34.
  30. Yontef G., Friedemann S. (2013). Dialogic Relationship and Creative Techniques: Are They on the Same Team? Los Angeles, CA: Pacific Gestalt Institute.

Gary Yontef, L’atteggiamento relazionale nella teoria e nella pratica della terapia della Gestalt in "QUADERNI DI GESTALT" 1/2015, pp 111-129, DOI: 10.3280/GEST2015-001009