Competenze manageriali e costruzione sociale di conoscenza. Una ricerca sul campo

Author/s Silvia Ivaldi, Giuseppe Scaratti
Publishing Year 2016 Issue 2015/2
Language Italian Pages 30 P. 9-38 File size 268 KB
DOI 10.3280/SO2015-002001
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Through the description of a case study the paper presents a local and situated approach for the analysis and recognition of professional competences. The paper explores how the identification of competences recognized as significant by the organizational players, depends on specific modes of circulation of knowledge about professional practices and organizational cultures. The main objective is to highlight that the situated knowledge is the outcome of a social construction process, aimed at creating a profile of manager competences and evaluating of the skills generated by the situated processes. The paper initially describes the new and innovative organizational scenario, characterized by uncertainty, precariousness, rapid evolution and progressive pressure required to the organizational subjects in terms of adaptability, performativity and orientation towards results. The study then presents the research adopted method, in accordance with an approach of knowledge producing oriented to highlight repertoires of typical managerial practices and the negotiated symbolic order that emerges in the various situations recognized by the organizational actors as appropriate. The paper discusses the main results , describing the prospects for using the acquired knowledge within the considered experience and highlighting strengths and limitations of the considered approach. The discussion focuses on the epistemological, methodological and process implications related to the type of research adopted.

Keywords: Managerial competences, situated knowledge, practice based approach, social firm, innovation, training

  1. Allen, T. (1977), Managing the flow of technology, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
  2. Baitsch, C. (1993), Was bewegt Organisatione?, Frankfurt Campus.
  3. Baitsch, C. (1996), Wer lernt denn da? Bemerkungen zum Subjekt des Lerners, in Geißler, H. (ed.), Arbeit, Lernen Und Organisation, Weinheim: Dettscher Studienverla, pp. 215-231, Frankfurt Campus.
  4. Bruni, A., Gherardi, S. (2007), Studiare le pratiche lavorative, Bologna, il Mulino.
  5. Brown, J.S., Duguid, P. (1991), “Organizational Learning and communities of practice: towards a unified view of working, learning and innovation”, Organization Science, 2: 40-57.
  6. Brown, J.S., Duguid, P. (2001), “Knowledge and Organization: a social-practice perspective”, Organization Science, 12(2): 198-213.
  7. Carlile, P.R. (2004), “Transferring, Transalting and ransforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Bounderies”, Organization Science, 15(5): 555-568.
  8. Cook, S.D.N., Brown, J.S. (1999), “Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing”, Organizaton Science, 10: 381-400.
  9. Corbin, J., Strauss, A. (1993), “The Articulation of Work Trough Interaction”, Sociological Quarterly, 1: 71-83.
  10. Costley, C., Elliott, G., Gibbs, P. (2010), Doing Work Based Research, London, Sage.
  11. Cunliffe, A. (2001), “Managers as Practical Authors: reconstructing our understanding of management practice”, Journal of Management Studies, 38(3): 351-371.
  12. Cunliffe, A. (2004), “On Becoming a Critically Reflexive Practitioner”, Journal of Management Education, 28(4): 407-426.
  13. Cunliffe, A. (2014), A very Short, fairly Interesting and reasonably Cheap Book about Management, London, Sage.
  14. Cunliffe, A., Eriksen, M. (2011), “Relational leadership”, Human Relations, 64(11): 1425-1449 DOI: 10.1177/0018726711418388
  15. Czarniawska, B. (2007), Shadowing and other techniques for doing fieldwork in mothern societies, Copenhagen, Business school press, Herndon, VA.
  16. Czarniawska B. (2008), A Theory of Organizing, Elgar, Cheltenham.
  17. Dall’Alba, G., Sandberg, J. (1996), “Educating for competence in professional practice”, Instructional Science, 24: 411-437.
  18. Engeström, Y. (2004), “New forms of learning in co-configuration work”, Journal of Workplace Learning, 16 (1-2): 11-21.
  19. Engeström, Y. (2005), “Knotworking to Create Collaborative Intentionality Capital in Fluid Organizational Fields”, 11: 307-336.
  20. Eraut, M. (2001), Developing Professional Knowledge and Competence, London, Routledge.
  21. Gherardi, S. (2003), “Sapere situato ed ambiguità decisionale in una comunità di pratiche”, Studi Organizzativi, 3: 159-183.
  22. Gibbons, M., Limoges, H., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M. (1994), The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies, London, Sage.
  23. Gorli, M., Kaneklin, C., Scaratti, G. (2012), “A multi-method approach for looking inside healthcare practices”, Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 7(3): 290-307 DOI: 10.1108/17465641211279761
  24. Gorli, M., Nicolini, D., Scaratti, G. (2015), “Reflexivity in practice: Tools and conditions for developing organizational authorship”, Human Relations DOI: 10.1177/0018726714556156
  25. Gulick, L., Urwick, L. (1937), “Papers on the Science of Administration”, New York, Institute of PA, Columbia University.
  26. Le Boterf, G. (2004), Construire les competences individuelles et collectives, Paris, Editions d’Organisation.
  27. Le Boterf, G. (2010), Repenser la compétence, Paris, Editiones d’Organisation.
  28. Lindgren, R., Stenmark, D., Ljungberg, J. (2003), “Rethinking competence systems for knowledge- based organizations”, European Journal of Information Systems, 12: 18-29.
  29. Lipari, D. (2008), “Per un uso in chiave (auto) valutativa delle etnografie organizzative”, Rassegna Italiana di valutazione, 40: 77-88.
  30. Mintzberg, H. (2009), “Rebuilding Companies as Communities”, Harvard Business Review.
  31. Mitton, C., Adair, C.E., McKenzie, E., Patten, S.B., Waye Perry, B. (2007), “Knowledge transfer and exchange: review and synthesis of the literature”, The Milbank Quarterly, 85(4): 729-768.
  32. Newell, S., Robertson, M., Scarbrough, H., Swam, J. (2009), Managing Knowledge Work, London, Palgrave.
  33. Nicolini, D. (2009), “Articulating Practice through the Interview to the Double”, Management Learning, 40(2): 195-212.
  34. Nicolini, D. (2013), Practice theory, work and organization: an introduction, Oxford University Press.
  35. Normann, R. (2002), Ridisegnare l’impresa. Quando la mappa cambia il paesaggio, Milano, Etas.
  36. Oddone, I., Re, A., Briante, G. (1977), Esperienza operaia, coscienza di classe e psicologia del lavoro, Torino, Einaudi.
  37. Orlikoswski, W.J. (2002), “Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributed organizations”, Organization Science, 13(3): 249-273.
  38. Piccardo, C., Kaneklin, C., Scaratti, G. (2010), La ricerca-azione. Cambiare per conoscere nei contesti organizzativi, Raffaello Cortina, Milano.
  39. Raelin, J. (2008), Work-based Learning: Bridging Knowledge and Action in Workpalce, San Francisco CA, Jossey-Bass.
  40. Ripamonti, G., Scaratti, G. (2012), “Weak knowledge for strengthening competences: A practice-based approach in assessment management”, Management Learning, 43(2): 183-197.
  41. Sandberg, J., (2000), “Understanding Human Competence at work: an interpretative approach”, Academy of Management Journal, 43(1): 9-25.
  42. Sandberg, J., Pinnington, A.H. (2009), “Professional Competence as Ways of Being: An Existential Ontological Perspective”, Journal of Management Studies, 46(7): 1138-1169.
  43. Scaratti, G. (2012), “Costruire ambienti organizzativi: uno sguardo psicologico tra pratiche organizzative e riflessione in azione”, Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 53(2): 315-339.
  44. Scaratti, G. (2013), “Verso una cloud research? Nuove prospettive per la produzione di conoscenza rilevante nella psicologia del lavoro e delle organizzazioni”, Psicologia Sociale, 1: 131-154.
  45. Stoof, A., Martens, B.L., Van Merrienboer, J.J.G., Bastiaens, T.J. (2002), “The Boundary Approach of Competence: A Constructivist Aid for Understanding and Using the Concept of Competence”, Human Resource Development Review, 1(3): 345-365.
  46. Tsoukas, H. (1996), “The firm as a distributed knowledge system: a constructionist approach”, Strategic Management Journal, 17: 11-25.
  47. Varanini, F. (2010), Contro il management. La vanità del controllo, gli inganni della finanza e la speranza di una costruzione comune, Milano, Guerini e Associati.
  48. Weick, K.E. (1995), Sensemaking in Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage.
  49. Weick K., Sutcliffe K.M. (2007), Managing unexpected. Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty, Jossey-Bass.
  50. Zucchermaglio, C., Alby, F. (2014), La ricerca situata, Bologna, il Mulino.

Silvia Ivaldi, Giuseppe Scaratti, Competenze manageriali e costruzione sociale di conoscenza. Una ricerca sul campo in "STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI " 2/2015, pp 9-38, DOI: 10.3280/SO2015-002001