Planning mega-events in London, Milan and Shanghai: a comparison of experiences

Author/s Matteo Basso
Publishing Year 2016 Issue 2016/1
Language Italian Pages 18 P. 124-141 File size 243 KB
DOI 10.3280/ES2016-001009
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Mega-events such as the Olympic Games and Universal Expositions represent a global phenomenon, not only according to their symbolic significance, media coverage and associated flows of visitors. Most importantly, their organizational process is characterized by a significant set of rules and standardized procedures which is globally imposed by international organizing bodies such as the International Olympic Committee (for the Olympic Games) and the Bureau International des Expositions (for the World Expos). In this perspective, planning a large event ultimately becomes a process of continuous hybridization of global rules and local interpretations. This paper aims at analyzing the bidding and planning experiences carried out in three different cities which have recently hosted mega-events: London, Milan and Shanghai. The goal is to discuss the similarities and differences in the associated configurations to the same global phenomenon.

Keywords: Mega-events, Urban Planning, Governance, London 2012, Milan 2015, Shanghai 2010

Jel codes: R5, R58

  1. Bolocan Goldstein M. (2009). Geografie milanesi. Santarcangelo di Romagna: Maggioli Editore.
  2. Bolocan Goldstein M. (2011). Milano a Nord Ovest: geografie volontarie. In: Bolocan Goldstein M., Botti S. e Pasqui G., a cura di. Nord Ovest Milano. Uno studio geografico operativo. Milano: Electa: 18-19.
  3. Brown R., Cox G. e Owens M. (2012). Bid, delivery, legacy – creating the governance architecture of the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games legacy. Australian Planner, 49(3): 226-238.
  4. Burbank M.J., Andranovich G.D. e Heying C.H. (2001). Olympic Dreams. The impact of Mega-Events on local politics. Boulder (Colorado): Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  5. Capantini M. (2010). I grandi eventi. Esperienze nazionali e sistemi ultrastatali. Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica.
  6. Chen X. (2009). Introduction. A globalizing city on the rise. Shanghai’s transformation in comparative perspectives. In: Chen X., ed. Shanghai rising. State power and local transformations in a global megacity. Minneapolis e London: University of Minnesota Press: XV-XXXV.
  7. Cochrane A., Peck J. e Tickell A. (1996). Manchester plays Games: exploring the local politics of globalization. Urban Studies, 33(8): 1319-1336.
  8. Dansero E. (2002). I “luoghi comuni” dei grandi eventi. Allestendo il palcoscenico territoriale per Torino 2006. In: Dansero E. e Segre A., a cura di. Il territorio dei grandi eventi. Riflessioni e ricerche guardando a Torino 2006, numero monografico del Bollettino della Società Geografica Italiana, serie XII, VII(4): 861-894.
  9. Davis J. e Thornley A. (2010). Urban regeneration for the London 2012 Olympics: issues of land acquisition and legacy. City, Culture and Society, 1: 89-98, DOI: 10.1016/j.ccs.2010.08.002
  10. De Magistris A. (2008). Il ruolo dei Megaeventi nello sviluppo urbano e regionale. Una lettura storica. Torino: Istituto di Ricerche Economico Sociali del Piemonte.
  11. Dente B. (2009). Studiare le decisioni politico/amministrative: l’approccio dell’analisi delle politiche pubbliche. In: Fareri P. e Giraudi M., a cura di. Rallentare. Il disegno delle politiche urbane. Milano: FrancoAngeli:
  12. 25-44. Di Vita S. (2010). Milano Expo 2015. Un’occasione di sviluppo sostenibile. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  13. Dunn K.M. e McGuirk P.M. (1999). Hallmark events. In: Cashman R. e Hughes A., eds. Staging the Olympics. The event and its impact. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press: 18-32.
  14. Essex S. e Chalkley B. (1998). Olympic Games: catalyst of urban change. Leisure Studies, 17(3): 187-206.
  15. Evans G. (2013). Materializing the vision of a 2012 London Olympic Games.
  16. In: Girginov V., ed. Handbook of the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Vol. I: Making the Games. London: Routledge: 45-61.
  17. Gallione A. (2012). Dossier Expo. Tutti i dati, i numeri, i progetti del più grande cantiere italiano. Milano: Bur Rizzoli.
  18. Getz D. (2005) 2nd edition. Event Management & Event Tourism. New York: Cognizant Communication Corporation.
  19. Guala C. (2009). Mega Eventi. Modelli e storie di rigenerazione urbana. Roma: Carocci.
  20. Hartman H. (2012). London 2012 sustainable design. Delivering a games legacy. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  21. Harvey D. (1989a). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: the transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler, 71(1): 3-17.
  22. Harvey D. (1989b). The urban experience. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Trad. it. (1998). L’esperienza urbana. Milano: il Saggiatore.
  23. Hiller H.H. (2000). Mega-events, Urban Boosterism and Growth Strategies: an Analysis of the Objectives and Legitimations of the Cape Town 2004 Olympic bid. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(2): 439-458. Article first published online: 7 Mar 2003, DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00256
  24. Horne J. (2013). From 1908 to 2012: continuity and change in London Olympic narratives. In: Girginov V., ed. Handbook of the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Volume One: Making the Games. London: Routledge: 17-28.
  25. Kearns G. e Philo C., eds. (1993). Selling places. The city as cultural capital, past and present. Oxford [etc.]: Pergamon.
  26. Kingdon J.W. (1995). 2nd edition. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Harlow e New York: Longman.
  27. Logan J.R., eds. (2008). Urban China in Transition. Malden (MA): Blackwell.
  28. Logan J.R. e Molotch H.L. (1987). Urban fortunes. The political economy of place. Berkeley e Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  29. Massey D. (2005). For space. London, Thousand Oaks e New Delhi: Sage.
  30. Masterman G. (2013). Preparing and winning the London bid. In: Girginov V., ed. Handbook of the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games.
  31. Volume One: Making the Games. London: Routledge: 29-42.
  32. Muñoz F. (2006). Olympic urbanism and Olympic Villages: planning strategies in Olympic host cities, London 1908 to London 2012. In: Horne J. e Manzeinreiter W., eds. Sports mega-events. Social scientific analyses of a global phenomenon. Malden, Oxford e Carlton: Blackwell Publishing: 175-187.
  33. Newman P. e Thornley A. (2005). Planning world cities. Globalization and urban politics. Basingstoke e New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  34. Paddison R. (1993). City marketing, image reconstruction and urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 30(2): 339-349.
  35. Raco M. (2013). Delivering flagship projects in an era of regulatory capitalism: state-led privatization and the London Olympics 2012. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.12025:1-22
  36. Ren X. (2011). Building globalization. Transnational architecture production in urban China. Chicago e London: The University of Chicago Press.
  37. Ritchie J.B.R. (1984). Assessing the impact of hallmark events: conceptual and research issues. Journal of Travel Research, 23(1): 2-11.
  38. Robinson J. (2011). Cities in a world of cities: the comparative gesture. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(1): 1-23, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00982.x
  39. Roche M. (2000). Mega-events and modernity. Olympics and expos in the growth of global culture. London: Routledge.
  40. Sassen S. (1991). The global city. New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University.
  41. Shoval N. (2002). A new phase in the competition for the Olympic Gold: the London and New York bids for the 2012 Games. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(5): 583-599.
  42. Short J.R. (2008). Globalization, cities and the Summer Olympics. City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 12(3): 321-340, DOI: 10.1080/13604810802478888
  43. Smith A. (2012). Events and urban regeneration. The strategic use of events to revitalise cities. London; New York: Routledge.
  44. Smith A. (2013). “De-Risking” East London: Olympic regeneration planning 2000-2012. European Planning Studies: 1-21, DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2013.812065
  45. Stone C.N. (1989). Regime politics. Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence, Kan.: University Press of Kansas.
  46. Thornley A. (2012). The 2012 London Olympics. What legacy? Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 4(2): 206-210, doi 10.1080/19407963.2012.662617.
  47. Venturi M., a cura di (1994). Grandi eventi. La festivalizzazione della politica urbana. Venezia: Il Cardo editore. Vitellio I. (2009). Regimi urbani e grandi eventi. Napoli, una città sospesa. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  48. Ward K. (2010). Towards a relational comparative approach to the study of cities. Progress in Human Geography, 34(4), 471-487.
  49. Wu F., eds. (2006). Globalization and the Chinese city. London e New York: Routledge.
  50. Yin R.K. (1994). 2nd edition. Case study research. Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, London e New Delhi: Sage

Matteo Basso, Esperienze di pianificazione di grandi eventi a confronto: Londra, Milano, Shanghai in "ECONOMIA E SOCIETÀ REGIONALE " 1/2016, pp 124-141, DOI: 10.3280/ES2016-001009