European Cities’ Size and Growth: Uncertainty Particularly Affects Medium-size Cities

Author/s Gilberto Seravalli
Publishing Year 2016 Issue 2016/2
Language Italian Pages 18 P. 91-108 File size 284 KB
DOI 10.3280/SCRE2016-002005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Medium-small cities are far more numerous in Europe than in the United States and other large countries. Therefore justified is a strong interest in the study of these urban areas, although the more recent growth of large cities with more than 500,000 inhabitants tends to monopolize the attention. Between 2000 and 2012 it was primarily medium-sized cities (between 80 and 500 thousand inhabitants) that grew less. Today, therefore, medium cities seem to have special conditions significantly different from those of larger and smaller cities. After highlighting these trends (in 352 European cities), the paper proposes an interpretation which characterizes medium-sized cities as those most likely to be adversely affected by increased uncertainty. The recommendation that ensues is to support especially in medium-sized cities the difference between net returns on innovative risky activities and the returns on traditional safe ones through good public services particularly useful for agents of innovation.

Keywords: Urban economics; urban and regional growth; uncertainty and innovation.

Jel codes: O18; R12; R28

  1. Acemoglu D., Zilibotti F., 1997, «Was Prometeus Unbound by Chance? Risk, Diversification and Growth». The Journal of Political Economy, 105, 4: 709-751.
  2. Beaudry C., Schiffauerova A., 2009, «Who’s Right, Marshall or Jacobs? The Localization versus Urbanization Debate». Research Policy, 38, 2: 318-337. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.11.010
  3. Berry B.J.L., Okulicz-Kozaryn A., 2012, «The City Size Distribution Debate: Resolution for US Urban Regions and Megalopolitan Areas». Cities, 29, 1: S17-S23. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.007
  4. David Q., Peeters D., Van Hamme G., Vandermotten C., 2013, «Is Bigger Better? Economic Performances of European Cities 1960-2009». Cities, 35: 237-254. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2013.07.011
  5. Drèze J., Bean C., 1990, Europe’s Employment Problem: Introduction and Synthesis. core Discussion Papers 1990041. Center for Operations Research and Econometrics: Université catholique de Louvain.
  6. espon, 2006, Espon 1.4.1 - The Role of Small and Medium-Sized Towns (smesto) - Final Report. Wien: Austrian Institute for Regional Studies and Spatial Planning.
  7. EU2015.LV, 2015, Report on Small and Medium-sized Urban Areas Problems and the Growth Potential both at the European Union and Latvian Scale. Latavian Presidency of the European Union.
  8. Evans G., 2009, «Creative Cities, Creative Spaces and Urban Policy». Urban Studies, 46, 5-6: 1003-1040. DOI: 10.1177/0042098009103853
  9. Florida R., 2002, The Rise Of The Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community And Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
  10. Frenkel A., Bendit E., Kaplan S., 2013, «Residential Location Choice of Knowledge-workers in a ‘Startup Metropolis’: The Role of Amenities, Workplace and Lifestyle». Cities, 35: 33-41.
  11. Gabaix X., 1999, «Zipf’s Law for Cities: An Explanation». The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 3: 739-767. DOI: 10.1162/003355399556133
  12. Gabaix X., Ibragimov R., 2011, «Rank-1/2: A Simple Way to Improve the ols Estimation of Tail Exponents». Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 29, 1: 24-39. DOI: 10.3386/t0342
  13. Gabaix X., Ioannides Y.M., 2004, «The Evolution of City Size Distributions». In: Henderson J.V. and Thisse J.F. (eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics: vol. 4 Cities and Geography. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2341-2378. Gan L., Li D., Song S., 2006, «Is the Zipf Law Spurious in Explaining City-size Distributions?». Economics Letters, 92: 256-262.
  14. Gancia G., Zilibotti F., 2005, «Horizontal Innovation in the Theory of Growth and Development». In: Aghion P. and Durlauf S. (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, 1, 1, chapter 3: 111-170. New York: North Holland.
  15. Giesen K., Suedekum J., 2012, «The Size Distribution Across all ‘Cities’: A Unifying Approach». cesifo Working Paper Series, 3730.
  16. Kemmerling A., Stephan A., 2002, «The Contribution of Local Public Infrastructure to Private Productivity and its Political Economy: Evidence from a Panel of Large German Cities». Public Choice, 113, 3-4: 403-424.
  17. Kemmerling A., Stephan A., 2008, «The Politico-economic Determinants and Productivity Effects of Regional Transport Investment in Europe». EIB Papers, 7. European Investment Bank (eib).
  18. Krugman P., 1996, «Confronting the Mystery of Urban Hierarchy». Journal of the Japanese and International Economics, 10, 4: 399-418. DOI: 10.1006/jjie.1996.0023
  19. Laherrere J., Sornette D., 1998, «Stretched Exponential Distributions in Nature and Economy: Fat Tails with Characteristic Scales». The European Phisical Journal B, 2: 525-539. DOI: 10.1007/s100510050276
  20. Malevergne Y., Pisarenko V., Sornette D., 2009, «Gibrat’s Law for Cities: Uniformly most Powerful Unbiased test of the Pareto against the Lognormal». Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series, 9. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.036111
  21. Martin-Brelot H., Grossetti M., Eckert D., Gritsai O., Kovàcs Z., 2010, «The Spatial Mobility of the ‘Creative Class’: A European Perspective». International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 34, 4: 854-870. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00960.x
  22. Moriconi-Ebrard F., 1993, L’urbanisation du Monde depuis 1950. Paris: Editions Anthropos.
  23. Psycharis Y., Rodríguez-Pose A., Tselios V., 2012, «Public Investment and Regional Growth and Convergence: Evidence from Greece». Papers in Regional Science, 91, 3: 543-568. DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2012.00444.x
  24. Rapoport A., 1978, «Rank-size Relations». In: Kruskal H., Tanur J.M. (eds.), International Encyclopedia of Statistics, 2: 847-854. New York: Free Press.
  25. Rozenfeld H.D., Rybski D., Gabaix X., Makse H.A., 2011, «The Area and Population of Cities: New Insights from a Different Perspective on Cities». American Economic Review, 101, 5: 2205-2225. DOI: 10.1257/aer.101.5.2205
  26. Rybski D., Garcìa Cantù Ros A., Kropp J.P., 2013, «Distance Weighted City Growth». Physical Review, 87, 4: 1-6. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.87.042114
  27. Storper M., 2011, «From Retro to Avant-garde: A Commentary on Paul Krugman’s ‘The New Economic Geography, Now Middle-aged’». Regional Studies, 45, 1: 9-15. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2011.537130
  28. Turok I., Mykhnenko V., 2007, «The Trajectories of European Cities, 1960-2005». Cities, 24, 3: 165-182. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2007.01.007
  29. Veneri P., 2013, «On City Size Distribution: Evidence from oecd Functional Urban Areas». oecd Regional Development Working Papers, 27. oecd Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/5k3tt100wf7j-en
  30. Zipf G.K., 1949-2012, Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. Reprint of 1949 edition. Manfield CT: Martino Publishing.

  • Spatial Planning Policy for Sustainability: Analysis Connecting Land Use and GHG Emission in Rural Areas Michele Pezzagno, Anna Richiedei, Maurizio Tira, in Sustainability /2020 pp.947
    DOI: 10.3390/su12030947

Gilberto Seravalli, Dimensioni e crescita delle città in Europa: l’incertezza danneggia soprattutto le città medie in "SCIENZE REGIONALI " 2/2016, pp 91-108, DOI: 10.3280/SCRE2016-002005