Le risposte. Il crollo della teoria freudiana del sogno

Author/s Frank J. Sulloway
Publishing Year 2016 Issue 2016/3 Language Italian
Pages 4 P. 606-609 File size 25 KB
DOI 10.3280/PU2016-003057
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

  1. Freud S. (1899 [1900]). L’interpretazione dei sogni. Opere, 3. Torino: Boringhieri, 1966.
  2. Freud S. (1924 [1925]). Autobiografia. Opere, 10: 71-141. Torino: Boringhieri, 1978.
  3. Aserinsky E. & Kleitman N. (1953). Regularly occurring periods of ocular motility and concomitant phenomena during sleep. Science, 118, 3062: 273-274. DOI: 10.1126/science.118.3062.273
  4. Domhoff W.G. (2007). Realistic simulation and bizarreness in dream content: Past findings and suggestions for future research. In: Barrett D. & McNamara P., editors, The New Science of Dreams: Content, Recall, and Personality Characteristics, Vol. 2. Westport, CT: Praeger Press, 2007, pp. 1-27.
  5. Domhoff G.W. (2011). Dreams are embodied simulations that dramatize conceptions and concert: The continuity hypothesis in empirical, theoretical, and historical context. International Journal of Dream Research, 4, 2: 50-62.
  6. Esterson A. (1993). Seductive Mirage: An Exploration of the Work of Sigmund Freud. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
  7. Hobson J.A. (2002). Dreaming: An Introduction to the Science of Sleep. New York: Oxford University Press (trad. it.: La scienza dei sogni: alla scoperta dei segreti del sonno. Milano: Mondadori, 2003).
  8. Hobson J.A. (2004). Freud returns? Like a bad dream. Scientific American, 290, 5: 89.
  9. Hobson J.A., Hoffman S.A., Helfand R. & Kostner D. (1987). Dream bizarreness and the activation-synthesis hypothesis. Human Neurobiology, 6, 3: 157-164.
  10. Hobson J.A. & McCarley R.W. (1977). The brain as a dream state generator: An activationsynthesis hypothesis of the dream process. American Journal of Psychiatry, 134, 12: 1335-1348.
  11. Hobson J.A., Pace-Schott E.F. & Stickgold R. (2000). Dreaming and the brain: Toward a cognitive neuroscience of conscious states. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 6: 793-842. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X00003976
  12. Macmillan M. (1991). Freud Evaluated: The Completed Arc. Amsterdam: North-Holland (2nd Edition: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 199).
  13. Scarone S., Manzone M.L., Gambini O., Kantzas I., Limosani I., D’Agostino A. & Hobson J.A. (2008). The dream as a model for psychosis: An experimental approach using bizarreness as a cognitive marker. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 34, 3: 515-522.
  14. Snyder F. (1970). The phenomenology of dreaming. In: Madow L. & Snow L.A., editors, The Psychodynamic Implications of the Physiological Studies on Dreams. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1970, pp. 124-151.
  15. Solms M. (1997). The Neuropsychology of Dreams: A Clinico-anatomical Study. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  16. Sulloway F.J. (1979). Freud, Biologist of the Mind: Beyond the Psychoanalytic Legend. New York: Basic Books (trad. it.: Freud biologo della psiche. Al di là della leggenda psicoanalitica. Milano: Feltrinelli, 1982).
  17. Sulloway F.J. (1986). Reassessing Freud’s case histories: The social construction of psychoanalysis. Isis, 1991, 82: 245-275 (relazione letta all’Incontro Annuale della History of Science Society, Bloomington, 1986). Anche in: Gelfand T. & Kerr J., editors, Freud and the History of Psychoanalysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, 1992 (trad. it.: Rivalutando i casi clinici di Freud: la costruzione sociale della psicoanalisi. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 1992, XXVI, 1: 7-37 [I parte] e 2: 3-30 [II parte]).
  18. Sulloway F.J. (2007). Psychoanalysis and pseudoscience: Frank J. Sulloway revisits Freud and his legacy. In: Dufresne T., editor, Against Freud: Critics Talk Back. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2007, pp. 48-69.
  19. Williams J., Merritt J., Rittenhouse C. & Hobson J.A. (1992). Bizarreness in dreams and fantasies: Implications for the activation-synthesis hypothesis. Consciousness and Cognition, 1, 2: 172-185. DOI: 10.1016/1053-8100(92)90059-J

  • Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences Frank J. Sulloway, pp.1 (ISBN:978-3-319-28099-8)
  • Where is psychoanalysis today? Sixty-two psychoanalysts share their subjective perspectives on the state of the art of psychoanalysis: A qualitative thematic analysis Alberto Stefana, Barbara Celentani, Aleksandar Dimitrijevic, Paolo Migone, Cesare Albasi, in International Forum of Psychoanalysis /2021 pp.234
    DOI: 10.1080/0803706X.2021.1991594
  • Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences Frank J. Sulloway, pp.5306 (ISBN:978-3-319-24610-9)

Frank J. Sulloway, Le risposte. Il crollo della teoria freudiana del sogno in "PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE" 3/2016, pp 606-609, DOI: 10.3280/PU2016-003057