Aristotle’s Magna Moralia and Ethics: the factors of virtue

Author/s Pierluigi Donini
Publishing Year 2016 Issue 2016/suppl. 4
Language Italian Pages 17 P. 5-21 File size 122 KB
DOI 10.3280/SF2016-004-S1002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

A comparison between the pseudo-Aristotelian writing of the Magna Moralia and the authentic Ethics shows that in his conception of the factors of virtue the anonymous writer is closer to the Eudemian than to the Nicomachean Ethics. He assumes that virtue results from the interaction between a natural impulse towards good and rationality, leaving only a small space for the teaching of practices – he see the latter more as a personal attempt at improvement and self-education than as, in Aristotelian fashion, a process guided by external, institutional or family educators. This general picture seems to indicate that the anonymous author of MM reformulated the bases of Aristotelian morality in terms more suited to an incipient Hellenistic age. An age in which, following the collapse of the political structures and culture of the polis, the individual had to learn to count only on his own personal resources.

Keywords: Aristotelian ethics, virtue, practices, natural abilities, Hellenism

  1. - Berti 2005: Enrico Berti, Il libro Lambda della Metafisica di Aristotele tra fisica e metafisica, in Enrico Berti, Nuovi studi aristotelici II –Fisica, antropologia e metafisica, Morcelliana, Brescia 2005, pp. 471-487.
  2. - Brink 1993: Karl Oskar Brink, Stil und Form der Pseudoaristotelischen Magna Moralia, Diss. Berlin, Ohlau 1933.
  3. - Cooper 1973: John Cooper, The Magna Moralia and Aristotle’s Moral Philosophy, ≪American Journal of Philology≫ XCIV (1973), pp.327-349 (e anche in Schrifen zur aristotelischen Ethik, herausgegeben von Christian Mueller Goldingen, Olms, Hildesheim 1988, pp.311-334).
  4. - Dirlmeier 1958: Aristoteles, Magna Moralia, ubersetzt von Franz Dirlmeier, Akademie Verlag, Berlin 1958.
  5. - Donini 1965: Pierluigi Donini, L’etica dei Magna Moralia, Universita di Torino-Giappichelli, Torino 1965. - Donini 2002: Id., Il libro Lambda della Metafisica e la nascita della filosofia prima, ≪Rivista di Storia della Filosofia≫ LVII (2002), pp.181-200 (e anche in Id., Commentary and Tradition. Aristotelianism, Platonism and Post-Hellenistic Philosophy, edited by Mauro Bonazzi, De Gruyter, Berlin-New York 2011, pp.17-36).
  6. - Donini 2014: Id., Abitudine e saggezza. Aristotele dall’Etica Eudemia all’Etica Nicomachea, Edizioni dell’Orso, Alessandria 2014.
  7. - During 1966: Aristoteles. Darstellung und Interpretation seines Denkens, Winter, Heidelberg 1966.
  8. - Jaeger 1928: Werner Jaeger, Ueber Ursprung und Kreislauf des philosophischen Lebensideals, ≪Sitzungsberichte der preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften≫, Philos.-histor. Klasse 1928, pp. 390-421.
  9. - Rowe 1975: Christopher Rowe, A Reply to John Cooper on the Magna Moralia, ≪American Journal of Philology≫ XCVI (1975), pp.160-172 (e anche in Schriften zur aristotelischen Ethik, herausgegeben von Christian Mueller Goldingen, Olms, Hildesheim 1988, pp. 371-384).
  10. - Zanatta 2014: Aristotele, La Grande Etica, a cura di Marcello Zanatta, Mimesis, Milano-Udine 2014.

Pierluigi Donini, Magna Moralia, le Etiche di Aristotele e i fattori della virtù in "RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA" suppl. 4/2016, pp 5-21, DOI: 10.3280/SF2016-004-S1002