Symbolic innovation and communities of consumption

Author/s Eleonora Di Maria, Vladi Finotto, Francesco Rullani
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2016/3
Language Italian Pages 10 P. 38-47 File size 219 KB
DOI 10.3280/ES2016-003003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The paper discusses about the role of consumers and communities of practices in firms’ innovation processes, by emphasizing community-based social dynamics related to knowledge production and sharing. Despite the attention given by prior studies on technological innovation, the paper is oriented to explore symbolic innovation and creativity processes linked to communities.

Keywords: Community, Symbolic Innovation, Creativity, Knowledge, User

  1. Chesbrough H.W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  2. Cohen W.M. and Levinthal D.A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128-152 Cova B., Kozinets R.V. and Shankar A. (2007). Consumer Tribes. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  3. Dahlander L. and Gann D.M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39(6): 699-709,
  4. Dholakia U.M. and Bagozzi R.P. (2006). Antecedents and purchase consequences of customer participation in small group brand communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(1): 45-61,
  5. Franke N. and Shah S.K. (2003). How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing among End-Users. Research Policy 32(1):157–178, DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00006-9
  6. Lave J. and Wenger E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Laursen K. and Salter A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2): 131-50,
  8. Muniz A.M. and O’Guinn T. (2001). Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(3): 412-432.
  9. Orr J. (1990). Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity: Community memory in a service culture. In: Middlewton D. e Edwards D., eds. Collective Remembering. London: Sage Publications.
  10. Poetz M.K. and Schreier M. (2012). The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(2): 245-256,
  11. Schouten J.W. and McAlexander J.H. (1995). Subcultures of consumption: An ethnography of new bikers. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1): 43-61.
  12. Simmons G. (2008). Marketing to postmodern consumers: Introducing the internet chameleon. European Journal of Marketing, 42(3-4): 299-310, doi. 10.1108/03090560810852940.
  13. von Hippel E. and Katz R (2002). Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Science, 48(7): 821-833,
  14. von Hippel E. (2005). Democratizing Innovation. Boston: MIT Press.
  15. Wenger E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Innovazione e piccole imprese: dimensioni e prospettive analitiche Giorgio Gosetti, in SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO 147/2017 pp.59
    DOI: 10.3280/SL2017-147004

Eleonora Di Maria, Vladi Finotto, Francesco Rullani, Innovazione simbolica e comunità di consumatori in "ECONOMIA E SOCIETÀ REGIONALE " 3/2016, pp 38-47, DOI: 10.3280/ES2016-003003