The Association between Big4 and Cost of Debt in Private Firms

Author/s Stefano Azzali, Tatiana Mazza
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/1
Language English Pages 20 P. 63-82 File size 263 KB
DOI 10.3280/FR2017-001003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This study investigates the association between choice of a Big4 audit firm and Cost of Debt compared with non-Big4 in Italian firms. Based on a sample of Italian companies audited by an audit firm in the period 2007-2012, we perform OLS regressions to test the Big4 association with Cost of Debt. Results confirm our expectation that audit firm size is a significant criterion of audit firm choice and we find that Big4 is associated with lower Cost of Debt than non-Big4 in private firms. The choice of Big4 audit firm reduce the specific agency conflict between banks and owner/management in private firms. We also find that private firms benefit from lower Cost of Debt than public companies. This research makes a contribution to the literature by extending previous results (Gul et al., 2013, Cano Rodriguez and Alegria, 2012, Karjalainen, 2011) to private firms and to the setting of Italy. Results may also be useful for companies choosing auditors in private firms and in the mitigation of agency conflict.

Keywords: Big4, cost of debt, private firms.

  1. Altman E.I. (1983), Corporate Financial Distress: A Complete Guide to Predicting, Avoiding, and Dealing with Bankruptcy. (New York: John Wiley and Sons).
  2. Azizkhani M., Monroe G.S. and Shailer G. (2013), Audit Partner Tenure and Cost of Equity Capital, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 32(1), pp. 183-202.
  3. Ball R., Robin A. and Sadka G. (2008), Is Financial Reporting Shaped by Equity Markets or by Debt Markets? An International Study of Timeliness and Conservatism, Review of Accounting Studies, 13(2-3), pp. 168-205.
  4. Ball R. and Shivakumar L. (2005), Earnings Quality in UK Private Firms: Comparative Loss Recognition Timeliness, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), pp. 83-128.
  5. Balsam S., Krishnan J. and Yang J.S. (2003). Auditor Industry Specialization and Earnings Quality, Auditing, 22(2), pp. 71-97.
  6. Beatty A.L., Ke B. and Petroni K.R. (2002), Earnings Management to Avoid Earnings Declines across Pubicily and Privately Held Banks, The Accounting Review, 77(3), pp. 547-570.
  7. Becker C.L., DeFond M.L., Jiambalvo J. and Subramanyam K.R. (1998), The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management, Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1), pp. 1-24.
  8. Blanco-Mazagatos V., De Quevedo-Puente E. and Castrillo L.A. (2007), The Trade-Off Between Financial Resources and Agency Costs in the Family Business: An Exploratory Study, Family Business Review, 20(3), pp. 199-213.
  9. Blackwell D.W., Noland T.R. and Winters D.B. (1998), The Value of Auditor Assurance: Evidence from Loan Pricing, Journal of Accounting Research, 36(1), Spring, pp. 57-70.
  10. Cameran M., Campa D. and Pettinicchio A. (2014), IFRS Adoption Among Private Companies: Impact on Earnings Quality, Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 29(3), pp. 278-305.
  11. Cano Rodríguez M.C. and Alegría S.S. (2012), The Value of Audit Quality in Public and Private Companies: Evidence from Spain, Journal of Management & Governance, 16(4), pp. 683-706.
  12. Chaney P.K., Jeter D.C. and Shivakumar L. (2004), Self-Selection of Auditors and Audit Pricing in Private Firms, The Accounting Review, 79(1), pp. 51-72.
  13. DeAngelo L.E. (1981), Auditor Size and Audit Quality, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), pp. 183-199.
  14. Feroz E.H., Park K. and Pastena V.S. (1991), Discussion of The Financial and Market Effects of the SEC Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases, Journal of Accounting Research, 29, pp. 107-142.
  15. Fortin S. and Pittman J.A. (2007), The Role of Auditor Choice in Debt Pricing in Private Firms, Contemporary Accounting Research, 24(3), pp. 859-896.
  16. Francis J.R. (1984), The Effect of Audit Firm Size on Audit Prices, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 6(2), pp. 133-151.
  17. Francis J.R. and Wilson E.R. (1988), Auditor Changes: A Joint Test of Theory Relating to Agency Costs and Auditor Differentiation, Accounting Review, 63(4), pp. 663-682.
  18. Francis J.R. and Krishnan J. (1999), Accounting Accruals and Auditor Reporting Conservatism, Contemporary Accounting Research, 16(1), pp. 135-165.
  19. Francis J.R., Richard C. and Vanstraelen A. (2009), Assessing France’s Joint Audit Requirement: Are Two Heads Better than One?, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), pp. 35-63.
  20. Francis J.R., Maydew E.L. and Sparks H.C. (1999), The Role of Big 6 Auditors in the Credible Reporting of Accruals, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 18(2), pp. 17-34.
  21. Francis J.R., Khurana I.K. and Pereira R. (2005), Disclosure Incentives and Effects on Cost of Capital around the World, The Accounting Review, 80(4), pp. 1125-1162.
  22. Gaver J.J. and Paterson J.S. (2001), The Association between External Monitoring and Earnings Management in the Property-Casualty Insurance Industry, Journal of Accounting Research, 39(2), pp. 269-282.
  23. Geiger M.A. and Rama D.V. (2006), Audit Fees, Nonaudit Fees, and Auditor Reporting on Stressed Companies, Auditing, 22(2), pp. 53-69.
  24. Gerayli M.S., Yanesari A.M. and Ma’atoofi A.R. (2011), Impact of Audit Quality on Earnings Management: Evidence from Iran, International Research Journal of Finance & Economics, 66, pp. 77-84.
  25. Ghosh A. and Moon D. (2005), Auditor Tenure and Perceptions of Audit Quality, The Accounting Review, 80(2), pp. 585-612.
  26. Gomez-Meija L.R. and Nunez-Nickel M. (2001), The Role of Family Ties in Agency Contracts, The Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), pp. 81-95.
  27. Guedami O. and Pittman J. (2008), The importance of IRS monitoring to debt pricing in private firms, Journal of Financial Economics, 90, pp. 38-58.
  28. Gul F.A., Zhou G.S. and Zhu X.K. (2013), Investor Protection, Firm Informational Problems, Big N Auditors, and Cost of Debt around the World, Auditing, 32(3), pp. 1-30.
  29. Hope O.K., Langli J.C. and Thomas W.B. (2012), Agency Conflicts and Auditing in Private Firms, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(7), pp. 500-517.
  30. Jensen M.C. and Meckling W.H. (1976), Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), pp. 305-360.
  31. Karjalainen J. (2011), Audit Quality and Cost of Debt Capital for Private Firms: Evidence from Finland, International Journal of Auditing, 15(1), pp. 88-108.
  32. Khurana I.K. and Raman K.K. (2004), Litigation Risk and the Financial Reporting Credibility of Big 4 versus Non-Big 4 Audits: Evidence from Anglo-American Countries, The Accounting Review, 79(2), pp. 473-495.
  33. Kim J.B., Simunic D.A., Stein M.T. and Yi C.H. (2011), Voluntary Audits and the Cost of Debt Capital for Privately Held Firms: Korean Evidence, Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(2), pp. 585-615.
  34. Kim J.-B., Chung R. and Firth M. (2003), Auditor Conservatism, Asymmetric Monitoring, and Earnings Management, Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(2), pp. 323-359.
  35. Lennox C. (2005), Audit Quality and Executive Officers’ Affiliations with CPA Firms, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(2), pp. 201-231.
  36. Li C., Xie Y. and Zhou J. (2010), National Level, City Level Auditor Industry Specialization and Cost of Debt, Accounting Horizons, 24(3), pp. 395-417.
  37. Mansi S.A., Maxwell W.F. and Miller D.P. (2004), Does Auditor Quality and Tenure Matter to Investors? Evidence from the Bond Market, Journal of Accounting Research, 42(4), pp. 755-793.
  38. Mazza T. (2016), Audit Quality Misure individuali e Multidimensionali. (Torino: Giappichelli).
  39. Melis A. (2004), On The Role Of The Board Of Statutory Auditors In Italian Listed Companies, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(1), pp. 74-84.
  40. Moizer P. (1997), Auditor Reputation: The International Empirical Evidence, International Journal of Auditing, 1(1), p. 61.
  41. Nelson M.W., Elliott J.A. and Tarpley R.L. (2002), Evidence from Auditors about Managers’ and Auditors’ Earnings Management Decisions, Accounting Review, 77 (Supplement), pp. 175-202.
  42. Niskanen M., Karjalainen J. and Niskanen J. (2011), Demand for Audit Quality in Private Firms: Evidence on Ownership Effects, International Journal of Auditing, 15(1), pp. 43-65.
  43. Palmrose Z.-V. (1986), Audit Fees and Auditor Size: Further Evidence, Journal of Accounting Research, 24(1), pp. 97-110.
  44. Peek E., Cuijpers R. and Buijink W. (2010), Creditors’ and Shareholders’ Reporting Demands in Public Versus Private Firms: Evidence from Europe, Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(1), pp. 49-91.
  45. Pittman J.A. and Fortin S. (2004), Auditor Choice and the Cost of Debt Capital for Newly Public Firms, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(1), pp. 113-136.
  46. Power M. (1997), The Audit Society – Rituals of Verification. (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  47. Prencipe A., Bar-Yosef S., Mazzola P. and Pozza L. (2011), Income Smoothing in Family-Controlled Companies: Evidence from Italy, Corporate Governance, 19(6), pp. 529-546.
  48. Reichelt K.J. and Wang D. (2010), National and Office-Specific Measures of Auditor Industry Expertise and Effects on Audit Quality, Journal of Accounting Research, 48(3), pp. 647-686.
  49. Rizzotti D. and Greco A.M. (2013), Determinants of Board of Statutory Auditor and Internal Control Committee Diligence: A Comparison between Audit Committee and the Corresponding Italian Committees, International Journal of Accounting, 48(1), pp. 84-110.
  50. Schulze W.S., Lubatkin M., Dino R.N. and Buchholtz A.K. (2001), Agency Relationships in Family Firms: Theory and Evidence, Organization Science, 12(2), pp. 99-116.
  51. Simunic D. and Stein M. (1987), Product Differentiation in Auditing: Audit Firm Choice in the Market for Unseasoned New Issues. The Canadian Certified General Accountants Research Foundation.
  52. Teoh S.H. and Wong T.J. (1993), Perceived Auditor Quality and the Earnings Response Coefficient, The Accounting Review, 68(2), pp. 346-366.
  53. Vander Bauwhede H. and Willekens M. (2004), Evidence on (the Lack Of) Audit-Quality Differentiation in the Private Client Segment of the Belgian Audit Market, European Accounting Review, 13(3), pp. 501-522.
  54. Weber J. and Willenborg M. (2003), Do Expert Informational Intermediaries Add Value? Evidence from Auditors in Microcap IPOs, Journal of Accounting Research, 41(4), pp. 681-720.
  55. Willenborg M. (1999). Empirical Analysis of the Economic Demand for Auditing in the Initial Public Offering Market, Journal of Accounting Research, 37: 225-238.

  • The Italian depreciation suspension policy during the COVID-19 pandemic: consequences on private firms’ borrowing capacity Marco Maria Mattei, Matteo Merlo, Eleonora Monaco, in Accounting in Europe /2023 pp.166
    DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2023.2174444

Stefano Azzali, Tatiana Mazza, The Association between Big4 and Cost of Debt in Private Firms in "FINANCIAL REPORTING" 1/2017, pp 63-82, DOI: 10.3280/FR2017-001003