The Double Face of Habits. Time and Timeless in Pragmatic Experience

Author/s Ivo A. Ibri
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/3 Language English
Pages 20 P. 455-474 File size 22422 KB
DOI 10.3280/SF2017-003006
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

According to Peirce, when habits are semiotic modes of representation of otherness, the facts related to them currently appear redundant, in a temporal way. Habits thus conceived reveal themselves as efficient guides of conduct in the face of their adherence to the future course of facts. Besides this logical function of habits, which could be called their positive face, we may ponder on another face of habits, which I here call negative, as it does not allow to see phenomena that do not matter to it. Many factual elements are excluded from their criterion of relevance that selects the phenomenical signs, among which those that do not call our attention for not feeding the formation of concepts due to their irregularity. They are discontinuous events. However, what would these irregularities mean? What relations do they maintain with the continuum of time? What importance would they have to human conduct? While these questions may have possible answers here, their deepness invites the continuity of the reflection they give rise to?

Keywords: Peirce, habits, phenomenology, mediations, semiotic, art.

  1. Peirce’s Perspective, «Cognitio», 11 (2010), 1, pp. 11-21.
  2. Colapietro 2009: Vincent Colapietro, Habit, Competence, and Purpose: How to Make the Grades of Clarity Clearer, «Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society», 45 (2009), 3, pp. 348-377.
  3. Dilworth 2010: David Dilworth, Elective Metaphysical Affinities: Emerson’s “Natural History of Intellect” and Peirce’s Synechism, «Cognitio», 11 (2010), 1, pp. 22-47.
  4. Fabbrichesi 2008: Rossella Fabbrichesi, The Greek Roots of Pragmatism: a New Word for an Old Way of Thinking, «Cognitio», 9 (2008), 2, pp. 205-221.
  5. Hausman 1993: Carl R. Hausman, Charles Sanders Peirce’s Evolutionary Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1993.
  6. Hookway 2002: Christopher Hookway, Truth, Rationality, and Pragmatism: Themes from Peirce, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2002.
  7. Houser 2015: Nathan Houser, The Imperative for Non-rational Belief, «Cognitio», 16 (2015), 2, pp. 273-290.
  8. Ibri 2010: Ivo Assad Ibri, Peircean Seeds for a Philosophy of Art, in Jamin Pelkey, Karen A. Haworth, Jason Hogue, Leonard G. Sbrocchi (eds.), Semiotics 2010. “The Semiotics of Space”, Legas Publishers, New York 2010.
  9. Ibri 2012: Id., Choices, Dogmatisms and Bets: Justifying Peirce’s Realism, «Veritas», 57 (2012), 2, pp. 51-61.
  10. Ibri 2015: Id., A formação de hábitos e a origem das leis na VII Conferência de Cambridge de Ch. S. Peirce, «Veritas», 60 (2015), 3, pp. 619-630.
  11. Ibri 2016: Id., The Ontology of Action in Peirce’s Philosophy, in Andrey Tashev, Elka Traykova, Paul Cobley, Miryana Yanakieva, Raya Kuncheva, (eds.), The Status of Thought in honorem Professor Ivan Mladenov, Prof. Marin Drinov Publishing House of Bulgarian Academy of Science; Boyan Penev Publishing Centre, Sofia 2016, pp. 76-85.
  12. Ibri 2016a: Id., Desenvolviendo una semilla peirceana: el arte y las cosas sin nombre, in Catalina Hynes y Jaime Nubiola (eds.), C. S. Peirce, ciencia, filosofía y verdad, La Monteagudo ediciones, San Miguel de Tucumán 2016, pp. 153-168.
  13. Innis 2013: Robert Innis, Peirce’s Categories and Langer’s Aesthetics: on Dividing the Semiotic Continuum, «Cognitio», 14, (2013), 1, pp. 35-50.
  14. Kinneavy, Eskin, 2000: James L. Kinneavy, Catherine R. Eskin, Kairos in Aristotle’s Rhetoric, «Written Communication», 17 (2000), pp. 432-444.
  15. Nöth 2010: Winfried Nöth, The Criterion of Habit in Peirce’s Definitions of the Symbol, «Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society», 46 (2010), 1, pp. 82-93.
  16. Nöth 2016: Id., Habits, Habit Change, and the Habit of Habit Change According to Peirce, in Myrdene Anderson, Donna E. West (eds.), Consensus on Peirce’s Concept of Habit: Before and Beyond Consciousness, Springer, New York, forthcoming 2016.
  17. Parker 1994: Kelly Parker, Peirce’s Semiotic and Ontology, «Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society», 30 (1994), 1, pp. 51-76.
  18. Peirce CP followed by volume and paragraph number: Charles Sanders Peirce, Collected Papers, vols. I-VI, Paul Weiss and Charles Hartshorne (eds.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA) 1931-1935; vols. VII-VIII, Arthur W. Burks (ed.), Harvard University Press, Cambridge (MA) 1958.
  19. Peirce EP followed by volume and page number: Id, The Essential Peirce, vol. 1, Nathan Houser and Christian Kloesel (eds.); vol. 2, The Peirce Edition Project (ed.), Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis 1992-1998.
  20. Peirce NEM followed by volume and page number: Id., The New Elements of Mathematics, 4 vols., Carolyn Eisele (ed.), Mouton, The Hague 1976.
  21. Peirce W followed by volume and page number: Id., Writings. A Chronological Edition, 7 vols., The Peirce Edition Project (eds.), Indiana University Press, Bloomington 1982-2010.
  22. Pietarinen 2008: Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen, The Place of Logic in Pragmatism, «Cognitio», 9 (2008), 2, pp. 247-260.
  23. Pietarinen 2005: Id., Cultivating Habits of Reason: Peirce and the logica utens versus logica docens Distinction, «History of Philosophy Quarterly», 22 (2005), 4, pp. 357-372.
  24. Popper 1972: Karl R. Popper, Objective knowledge: an Evolutionary Approach, Oxford University Press, New York 1972.
  25. Santaella 2004: Lucia Santaella, O papel da mudança de hábito no pragmatismo evolucionista de Peirce, «Cognitio», 5 (2004), 1, pp. 75-83.
  26. Santaella 2016: Ead., The Originality and Relevance of Peirce’s Concept of Habit, in Myrdene Anderson, Donna E. West (eds.), Consensus on Peirce’s Concept of Habit: Before and Beyond Consciousness, Springer, New York, 2016.
  27. Scotus 1987: John Duns Scotus, Philosophical Writings: a Selection, Allan B. Wolter (ed.), Hackett, Indianapolis, 1987.

  • On the bottomless lake of firstness: conjectures on the synthetic power of consciousness Ivo A. Ibri, in Semiotica /2021 pp.129
    DOI: 10.1515/sem-2021-0120

Ivo A. Ibri, The Double Face of Habits. Time and Timeless in Pragmatic Experience in "RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA" 3/2017, pp 455-474, DOI: 10.3280/SF2017-003006