«A Purposive Labour Law»: In dialogue with Guy Davidov

Author/s Bruno Caruso
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/156
Language English Pages 9 P. 749-757 File size 167 KB
DOI 10.3280/GDL2017-156006
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

  1. Alexy R. (2012). Teoria dei diritti fondamentali. Bologna: il Mulino.
  2. Aoki M. (2010). Corporations in Evolving Diversity. Cognition, Governance, and Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Barak A. (2005). Purposive interpretation in law. Princeton: Princeton University Press
  4. Barnard C. (2013). The Charter in time of crisis; a case study of dismissal. In: Countouris N., Freedland M., eds., Resocialising Europe in a Time of Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Bogg A., Costello C., Davies ACL, Prassl J. (2015). The Autonomy of Labour Law. Oxford and Oregon: Hart Publishing.
  6. Caruso B. (2007). Changes in the Workplace and the Dialogue of Labour Scholars in “Global Village”. CLL&PJ, 26: 1 ff
  7. Caruso B. (2009). I diritti sociali fondamentali nell’ordinamento costituzionale europeo. In: Sciarra S., Caruso B., a cura di, Il lavoro subordinato. Vol. V. Torino: Giappichelli.
  8. Caruso B. (forthcoming). Strategie di flessibilità funzionale e di tutela dopo il Jobs Act: Fordismo, Post fordismo e industria 4.0. DLRI.
  9. Caruso B. Militello M.G. (2012). L’Europa sociale e il diritto: il contributo del metodo comparato. WP CSDLE “Massimo D’Antona”.INT, 94/2012. Testo disponibile al sito: http://csdle.lex.unict.it/docs/workingpapers/LEuropa-sociale-e-il-diritto-il-contributo-del-metodo-comparato/3569.aspx (consultato il 10.8.2017).
  10. Collins H. (2007a). European Social Policy and Contract Law. ERPL, 3: 78 ss.
  11. Collins H. (2007b). Utility and Rights in Common Law Reasoning: Rebalancing Private Law Through Constitutionalization. LSE Working paper n. 6. London: LSE Legal Studies.
  12. Countouris N., Freedland M., ed. (2013). Resocialising Europe in a Time of Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Del Punta R., Caruso B. (2016), Il diritto del lavoro e l’autonomia perduta. LD: 645 ss.
  14. Deakin S., Wilkinson F., (2004). The Law of the Labour Market: Industrialization, Employment and legal Evaluation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  15. Dukes R. (2014). The Labour Constitution. The Enduring Idea of Labour Law Oxford: Ox-ford University Press.
  16. Fish S. (2008). Intention is all there is: a Critical Analysis of Aharon Barak’s purposive in-terpretation in Law. CLR: 1109 ss.
  17. Frickey P.P. (2006). Structuring purposive statutory interpretation: An American perspective. ALJ: 849 ss.
  18. Davidov G. (2009). A purposive Interpretation of the National Minimum Wage Act. MLR: 581 ss.
  19. Giugni G. (1989). Lavoro, legge, contratti. Bologna: il Mulino.
  20. Lewis P. (2000). Pregnant Workers and Sex Discrimination: the Limits of Purposive Non-comparative Methodology. IJCLLIR: 55 ss.
  21. McClelland J. (2012). A Purposive Approach to Employment Protection or a Missed Opportunity?. MLR: 387 ss.
  22. Merton R.K. (1985). On the shoulders of Giants. New York: Harcourt.

Bruno Caruso, «A Purposive Labour Law»: In dialogue with Guy Davidov in "GIORNALE DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DI RELAZIONI INDUSTRIALI " 156/2017, pp 749-757, DOI: 10.3280/GDL2017-156006