Non-technical barriers to (and drivers for) the circular economy through industrial symbiosis: A practical input

Author/s Rachel Lombardi
Publishing Year 2017 Issue 2017/1-2 Language English
Pages 19 P. 171-189 File size 1053 KB
DOI 10.3280/EFE2017-001009
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Industrial symbiosis is the use by one company or sector of resources (materials, energy, water, logistics, capacity) from another, thus reducing waste generation while delivering economic, environmental and social benefits. At all levels in Europe - local, regional, national, and the EU itself - industrial symbiosis is increasingly seen as a strategic tool to help deliver the circular economy. At least 20 Member States since 2009 have held awareness raising and implementation activities. Facilitated programs in 15 EU countries are engaging over 20,000 organisations in industrial symbiosis, and others have self-directing activity. Nevertheless, less than 0.1% of the 26 million active enterprises in Europe are known to be active in industrial symbiosis. Facilitator and company surveys and interviews on industrial symbiosis opportunities have identified non-technical barriers to industrial symbiosis: the lack of information is clearly identified as a barrier by companies, and addressing this is a large part of a facilitator role. Both companies and facilitators identify regulation, organisational and governance issues as potential barriers, usually addressed through facilitator support. Companies typically do not need help establishing the commercial viability of industrial symbiosis opportunities.

Keywords: Industrial symbiosis, barriers, innovation, circular economy.

Jel codes: 030, L23, L14

  1. Branson R. (2011). Bilateral Industrial Symbiosis, an Assessment of its Potential in New South Wales to Deal with Manufacturing Waste, University of Sydney, School of Geosciences.
  2. Chertow M., Lombardi D.R. (2005). Quantifying economic and environmental benefits of co-located firms. Environmental Science and Technology, 39(17): 6535-6541. DOI 10.1021/es050050+.
  3. Cordis G.D., Golev A., Fyfe J., King S. (2014). The Status of Industrial Ecology in Australia: Barriers and Enablers. Resources, 3: 340-361.
  4. Daddi T., Nucci B., Iraldo F. (2017). Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to measure the environmental benefits of industrial symbiosis in an industrial cluster of SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147: 157-164. DOI 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.001.
  5. DG Enterprise & Industry (2011). Sustainable Industry: Going for Growth, European Commission.
  6. DG GROW (2018). Cooperation fostering industrial symbiosis: market potential, good practice and policy actions, European Commission.
  7. DG Regions (2012). Connecting Smart and Sustainable Growth, European Commission.
  8. Dhanorkar S., Donohue K., Linderman K. (2015). Repurposing Materials & Waste Through Online Exchanges. Production and Operations Management, 24(9): 1473-1493. DOI 10.1111/poms.12345.
  9. Dobbs R., Oppenheim J., Thompson F., Brinkman M., Zornes M. (2011). Resource Revolution: Meeting the world’s energy, materials, food and water needs. McKinsey Global Institute and McKinsey Sustainability & Resource Productivity Practice. November.
  10. Doyle W., Pearce J.M. (2009). Utilization of virtual globes for open source industrial symbiosis. Open Environmental Sciences, 3: 88-96. DOI 10.2174/1876325100903010088.
  11. Ecorys (2011). Study on the Competitiveness of the European Companies and Resource Efficiency, ECORYS for DG Enterprise & Industry.
  12. Ehrenfeld J., Gertler N. (1997). Industrial Ecology in Practice: The Evolution of Interde-pendence at Kalundborg. Journal Industrial Ecology, 1(1): 67-79. DOI 10.1162/jiec.1997.1.1.67.
  13. European Commission (2014). “Towards a circular economy: a zero waste programme for Europe” (COM/2014/0398), Brussels.
  14. European Commission (2015). “'Closing the loop – An EU action plan for the Circular Economy” (COM/2015/0614) Brussels.
  15. Eurostat Business Demography. -- accessed January 2017.
  16. Fichtner W., Tietze-Stöckinger I., Frank M., Rentz O. (2005). Barriers of interorganisational environmental management: two case studies on industrial symbiosis. Progress in Industrial Ecology – An International Journal, 2(1): 73-88.
  17. FOX News (2007). Australian Companies Selling Sand to Saudi Arabia. -- Accessed January 2017.
  18. Frosch R.A., Gallopoulos N.E. (1989). Strategies for Manufacturing. Scientific American, 261(Sept): 144-152.
  19. Global Green Growth Forum. -- Accessed 31 January 2017.
  20. Golev A., Corder G.D., Giurco D.P. (2014). Barriers to Industrial Symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology. Article first published online: 14 JUL 2014.
  21. Golev, A., Corder, G. D. and Giurco, D. P. (2015), Barriers to Industrial Symbiosis: Insights from the Use of a Maturity Grid. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19: 141-153.
  22. Grant G.B., Seager T., Massard G., Nies L. (2010). Information and Communication Technology for Industrial Symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14(5): 740-753.
  23. Iacondini A., Vassura I., Mencherini U., Passarini F. (2015). Industrial Symbiosis Development in Italy: How the Regulatory Framework Affects the Feasibility of Processes. 18th International Trade Fair of Material & Energy Recovery and Sustainable Development, ECOMONDO, 5th-8th November, 2014, Rimini, Italy.
  24. La Region de Acton. No date. Business Opportunity: Eggshell Processing. --
  25. Lacy P., Keeble J., McNamara R., Rutqvist J., Haglund T. (2014). Circular Advantage: Innovative Business Models and Technologies to Create Value in a World without Limits to Growth. Accenture. Chicago, IL, USA.
  26. Laybourn P., Morrissey M. (2009). The Pathway to a Low-Carbon Sustainable Economy.
  27. Lombardi D.R., Laybourn P.T. (2007). Industrial Symbiosis in Action: Report on the 3rd Annual Industrial Symbiosis Research Symposium. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  28. Lombardi D.R., Laybourn P.T. (2012). Redefining Industrial Symbiosis: Crossing Academic-Practitioner Boundaries. Journal Industrial Ecology, 16(1): 28-37. DOI 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00444.x.
  29. Tödtling F., Kaufmann A. (2001). The Role of the Region for Innovation Activities of SMEs. European Urban and Regional Studies, 8(3): 203-215.
  30. van Berkel R. (2006). Regional Resource Synergies for Sustainable Development in Heavy Industrial Areas: an Overview of Opportunities and Experiences. Perth (WA), Australia: Curtin University of Technology. -- Available online at

  • What Is in a Name? The Rising Star of the Circular Economy as a Resource-Related Concept for Sustainable Development Andrea Cecchin, Roberta Salomone, Pauline Deutz, Andrea Raggi, Laura Cutaia, in Circular Economy and Sustainability /2021 pp.83
    DOI: 10.1007/s43615-021-00021-4
  • Uncovering the role of the industrial symbiosis facilitator in literature and practice in Nordic countries: An action-skill framework Leonie Schlüter, Lucia Mortensen, Rikke Drustrup, Allan Næs Gjerding, Lone Kørnøv, Ivar Lyhne, in Journal of Cleaner Production 134652/2022 pp.134652
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134652
  • Industrial Symbiosis Implementation Potential—An Applied Assessment Tool for Companies João Azevedo, Inês Ferreira, Rui Dias, Cristina Ascenço, Bruno Magalhães, Juan Henriques, Muriel Iten, Fernando Cunha, in Sustainability /2021 pp.1420
    DOI: 10.3390/su13031420
  • Implementing circular economy in a regional context: A systematic literature review and a research agenda Sanja Arsova, Andrea Genovese, Panayiotis H. Ketikidis, in Journal of Cleaner Production 133117/2022 pp.133117
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133117
  • Barriers, drivers, and relationships in industrial symbiosis of a network of Brazilian manufacturing companies Miguel Afonso Sellitto, Fábio Kazuhiro Murakami, Maria Angela Butturi, Simona Marinelli, Nelson Kadel Jr., Bianca Rimini, in Sustainable Production and Consumption /2021 pp.443
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.09.016
  • A Smart Contract Architecture Framework for Successful Industrial Symbiosis Applications Using Blockchain Technology Aurélien Bruel, Radu Godina, in Sustainability /2023 pp.5884
    DOI: 10.3390/su15075884
  • The battle of the buzzwords: A comparative review of the circular economy and the sharing economy concepts Marvin Henry, Daan Schraven, Nancy Bocken, Koen Frenken, Marko Hekkert, Julian Kirchherr, in Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions /2021 pp.1
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2020.10.008
  • Water Management and Circular Economy Teresa Fidélis, Manuel Victor Matos, Maria Carolina Sousa, Ana Catarina Miranda, Fayaz Riazi, Filipe Teles, Isabel Capela, pp.113 (ISBN:9780323952804)
  • Information Technology for Management: Current Research and Future Directions Linda Kosmol, Christian Leyh, pp.192 (ISBN:978-3-030-43352-9)
  • Environmental Sustainability and Industries Reza Vahidzadeh, Giorgio Bertanza, pp.405 (ISBN:9780323900348)
  • Measuring the Readiness of SMEs for Eco-Innovation and Industrial Symbiosis: Development of a Screening Tool Daniela C. A. Pigosso, Andreas Schmiegelow, Maj Munch Andersen, in Sustainability /2018 pp.2861
    DOI: 10.3390/su10082861
  • Social, Economic, and Institutional Configurations of the Industrial Symbiosis Process: A Comparative Analysis of the Literature and a Proposed Theoretical and Analytical Framework Emilia Faria, Armando Caldeira-Pires, Cristiane Barreto, in Sustainability /2021 pp.7123
    DOI: 10.3390/su13137123
  • Getting closer to SDG12: incorporating industrial ecology principles into project EIA Amani G. Rweyendela, in Journal of Environmental Planning and Management /2022 pp.953
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2021.1974361
  • A Case Study of Industrial Symbiosis in the Humber Region Using the EPOS Methodology Hélène Cervo, Stéphane Ogé, Amtul Samie Maqbool, Francisco Mendez Alva, Lindsay Lessard, Alexandre Bredimas, Jean-Henry Ferrasse, Greet Van Eetvelde, in Sustainability /2019 pp.6940
    DOI: 10.3390/su11246940
  • An industrial symbiosis simulation game: Evidence from the circular sustainable business development class Luca Fraccascia, Alessandra Sabato, Devrim Murat Yazan, in Journal of Industrial Ecology /2021 pp.1688
    DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13183
  • Towards a territorial definition of a circular economy: exploring the role of territorial factors in closed-loop systems Carlos Tapia, Marco Bianchi, Georg Pallaske, Andrea M. Bassi, in European Planning Studies /2021 pp.1438
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2020.1867511
  • An Assessment of European Information Technology Tools to Support Industrial Symbiosis Amtul Maqbool, Francisco Mendez Alva, Greet Van Eetvelde, in Sustainability /2018 pp.131
    DOI: 10.3390/su11010131
  • Factors influencing eco-industrial development in Africa: A SWOT analysis of a Tanzanian industrial park Amani G. Rweyendela, Godlisten G. Kombe, in African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development /2022 pp.1560
    DOI: 10.1080/20421338.2021.1972786
  • Evaluating the Barriers to Industrial Symbiosis Using a Group AHP-TOPSIS Model Tian Yang, Changhao Liu, Raymond P. Côté, Jinwen Ye, Weifeng Liu, in Sustainability /2022 pp.6815
    DOI: 10.3390/su14116815

Rachel Lombardi, Non-technical barriers to (and drivers for) the circular economy through industrial symbiosis: A practical input in "ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT" 1-2/2017, pp 171-189, DOI: 10.3280/EFE2017-001009