Sharing similar values is good for the family relationship quality: a study with parents having adolescent children

Author/s Marta Robitschek, Francesca Danioni, Daniela Barni, Raffaella Iafrate
Publishing Year 2018 Issue 2018/2
Language Italian Pages 29 P. 255-283 File size 291 KB
DOI 10.3280/RIP2018-002004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The process of value transmission and internalization takes place on a number of levels (individual, relational and social), simultaneously involving different social actors. Family relationships are the natural forum for value transmission, namely within the couple (horizontal transmission) and from parents to children (vertical transmission). Referring to Schwartz Theory of Basic Values (1992), this research aims to investigate how sharing values among family members is associated to the quality of family relationships, considering both the horizontal and vertical axis of the transmission. In particular, the research examines the association between the value similarity/dissimilarity in the couple and between parents and adolescent children on the one hand and the quality of relations as perceived by parents considered in terms both of relational satisfaction and relational self-efficacy on the other. 381 family triads, composed of father, mother and one adolescent child (age range: 15-19 years) living in northern Italy took part to the study; each participant completed a self-report questionnaire aimed at investigating the constructs of interest. Overall, the results show how sharing values within the family, both within the couple and between parents and children, is related to a higher relational satisfaction and to a higher self-efficacy as perceived by parents. Particularly, it is family members similarity in terms of the importance given to conservation values that supports the quality of the family relations.

Keywords: Values, Family relationships, Couple similarity, Relationship satisfaction, Self-efficacy.

  1. Clarke, A. C. (1952). An examination of the operation of residual propinquity as a factor in mate selection. American Sociological Review, 27, 17-22. DOI: 10.2307/2088355
  2. Allport, G.W. (1961). Pattern and Growth in Personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  3. Anderson, C., Keltner, D., & John, O.P. (2003). Emotional convergence between people over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1054-1068. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1054
  4. Barni, D. (2009). Trasmettere valori: tre generazioni familiari a confronto. Milano: Unicopli.
  5. Barni, D., & Ranieri, S. (2010). La trasmissione dei valori in famiglia: una misura diadica della similarita tra genitori e figli. In C. Galimberti & G. Scaratti (Eds.), Epsitemologie della complessità nella ricerca psicologica (pp. 63-95). Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
  6. Barni, D., Rosnati, R., & Scabini, E. (2011a). Trasmissione dei valori e relazioni familiari. In G.V. Caprara, E. Scabini, P. Steca, & S.H. Schwartz (Eds.). I valori nell’Italia contemporanea (pp. 94-115), Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  7. Barni, D., Ranieri, S., Scabini, E., & Rosnati, R. (2011b). Value transmission in the family: Do adolescents accept the values their parents want to transmit?. Journal of Moral Education, 40(1), 105-121. DOI: 10.1080/03057240.2011.553797
  8. Bengtson, V.L. (1975). Generation and family effects in value socialization. American Sociological Review, 40(3), 358-371. DOI: 10.2307/2094463
  9. Berry, J.W., & Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. (1986). Cultural and genetic influences on Inuit art. Report to Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Ottawa.
  10. Berry, J.W., Poortinga, Y.H., Segall, M.H., & Dasen, P.R. (2002). Cross-cultural Psychology: Research and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Bossard, J.H. (1932). Residential propinquity as a factor of marriage selection. American Journal of Sociology, 38(2), 219-224. DOI: 10.1086/216031.
  12. Burleson, B.R., & Denton, W.H. (1992). A new look at similarity and attraction in marriage: Similarities in social-cognitive and communication skills as predictors of attraction and satisfaction. Communication Monograph, 59(3), 268-287. DOI: 10.1080/03637759209376269
  13. Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
  14. Capanna, C., Vecchione, M., & Schwartz, S.H. (2005). La misurazione dei valori. Un contributo alla validazione del Portrait Values Questionnaire su un campione italiano. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 246, 29-41.
  15. Caprara, G.V., Regalia, C., & Scabini, E. (2001). Autoefficacia familiare. In G.V. Caprara, La valutazione dell’autoefficacia: costrutti e strumenti (pp. 63-86). Milano: Erikson.
  16. Caprara, G.V., Scabini, E., Steca, P., & Schwartz, S.H. (Eds.). (2011). I valori nell’Italia contemporanea. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  17. Caspi, A., & Herbener, E.S. (1990). Continuity and change: Assortative marriage and the consistency of personality in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 250-258. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.58.2.250.
  18. Caspi, A., Herberner, A.S., & Ozer, D.J. (1992). Shared experiences and the similarity of personalities: A longitudinal study on married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 281-291. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.62.2.281
  19. Castore, C.H., & Murnighan, J.K. (1978). Determinants of support for group decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22(1), 75-92. DOI: 10.1016/0030-5073(78)90006-5
  20. Cigoli, V. (2012). L’albero della discendenza. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  21. Clement, J.G. (2008). Value Similarity and Its Relationship to Interpersonal Relationship Quality and Identity: Perceptions of Self, Partner, and Ideal Partner. PhD diss., University of Tennessee.
  22. Danioni, F., Barni, D., & Rosnati, R. (2017). Transmitting sport values: The importance of parental involvement in children’s sport activity. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 13(1), 75-92.
  23. Donato, S., Iafrate, R., Bradbury, T. N., & Scabini, E. (2012). Acquiring dyadic coping: Partners and parents as models. Personal Relationships, 19(2), 386-400.
  24. Donato, S., Iafrate, R., & Barni, D. (2013). Parents as model for partners’ relational competences: Theoretical bases and empirical findings. In P. Barberis & S.
  25. Petrakis (Eds.) Parenting: Challenges, practices and cultural influences (pp. 83-102). New York: Nova Science.
  26. Donato, S., Parise, M., Iafrate, R., Bertoni, A., Finkenauer, C., & Bodenmann, G. (2015). Dyadic coping responses and partners’ perceptions for couple satisfaction: An actor–partner interdependence analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(5), 580-600.
  27. Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1985). Children’s perceptions of the qualities of the sibling relationship. Child Development, 56(2), 448-461. DOI: 10.2307/112973
  28. Garelli, F., Palmonari, A., & Sciolla, L. (2006). La socializzazione flessibile: Identità e trasmissione dei valori tra i giovani. Bologna: il Mulino.
  29. Gaunt, R. (2006). Couple similarity and marital satisfaction: Are similar spouses happier? Journal of Personality, 74(5), 1401–1420.
  30. Griffin, D., Murray, S., & Gonzalez, R. (1999). Difference score correlations in relationship research: A conceptual primer. Personal Relationships, 6(4), 505-518.
  31. Guarnieri, S., & Tani, F. (2011). Uno strumento per lo studio delle reti sociali: adattamento italiano del Network of Relationships Inventory (NRI). Giornale di Psicologia dello Sviluppo, 98, 7-23.
  32. Hitlin, S., & Piliavin, J.A. (2004). Values: Reviving a dormant concept. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 359-393.
  33. Iafrate, R., Bertoni, A., Donato, S., & Finkenauer, C. (2012a). Perceived similarity and understanding in dyadic coping among young and mature couples. Personal Relationships, 19(3), 401-419.
  34. Iafrate, R., Bertoni, A., Margola, D., Cigoli, V., & Acitelli, L.K. (2012b). The link between perceptual congruence and couple relationship satisfaction in dyadic coping. European Psychologist, 17(1), 73-82.
  35. Kenny, D.A., & Acitelli, L.K. (1994). Measuring similarity in couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 8(4), 417-431. DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.8.4.417
  36. Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and Values orientations in the Theory of Action: An Exploration in Definition and Classification. In T. Parsons & E. Shils (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action (pp. 388-433). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  37. Knafo, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Parenting and adolescents ‘accuracy in perceiving parental values. Child Development, 74(2), 595-611. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.7402018
  38. Kuczynski, L., & Grusec, J.E. (1997). Future directions for a theory of parental socialization. In J.E. Grusec & L. Kuczynski (Eds.), Parenting and the internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory (pp. 399-414). New York: Wiley.
  39. Kuczynski, L., Marshall, S., & Schell, K. (1997). Value socialization in a bidirectional context. In J.E. Grusec & L. Kuczynski (Eds.), Parenting and children’s internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory (pp. 23-50). New York: Wiley.
  40. Kuczynski, L., & Parkin, M.P. (2007). Agency and bidirectionality: Interactions, transactions, and relational dialectics. In J.E. Grusec & P.D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of Socialization (pp. 259-283). New York: The Guilford Press.
  41. Lanz, M., & Rosnati, R. (2002). Metodologia della ricerca sulla famiglia. Milano: LED.
  42. Lawrence, J.A., & Valsiner, J. (1993). Conceptual roots of internalization: From transmission to transformation. Human Development, 36(3), 150-167. DOI: 10.1159/000277333
  43. Lawson, D.M., & Brossart, D.F. (2001). Intergenerational transmission: Individuation and intimacy across three generations. Family Process, 40(4), 429-442.
  44. Luo, S., & Klohnen, E.C. (2005). Assortative mating and marital quality in newlyweds: A couple-centered approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 304-326. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.304
  45. Luo, S., Chen, H., Yue, G., Zhang, G., Zhaoyang, R., & Xu, D. (2008). Predicting marital satisfaction from self, partner, and couple characteristics: Is it me, you, or us?. Journal of Personality, 76(5), 1231-1266.
  46. Maio, G.R. (2010). Mental representations of social values. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 1-43. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2601(10)42001-8
  47. Montoya, R.M., & Horton, R.S. (2004). On the importance of cognitive evaluation as a determinant of interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(5), 696-712. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.696
  48. Parise, M. (2013). Molto più di due: costruzione dell’identità di coppia e relazioni familiari. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.
  49. Park, J.H., & Schaller, M. (2005). Does attitude similarity serve as a heuristic cue for kinship? Evidence of an implicit cognitive association. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26(2), 158-170. DOI: 10.1016/J.EVOLHUMBEHAV.2004.08.013.
  50. Prioste, A., Narciso, I., Goncalves, M.M., & Pereira, C. R. (2016). Adolescent parents’ values: The role played by retrospective perceptions of the family-of-origin. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(1), 224-231.
  51. Prioste, A., Narciso, I., Goncalves, M.M., & Pereira, C.R. (2017). Values’ family flow: Associations between grandparents, parents and adolescent children. Journal of Family Studies, 23(1), 98-117.
  52. 10.1080/13229400.2016.1187659. Roccas, S., Sagiv, L., & Navon, M. (2017). Methodological issues in studying personal values. In S. Roccas & L. Sagiv (Eds.), Values and Behavior: Taking a Cross Cultural Perspective (pp. 15-50). Berlin: Springer.
  53. Roest, A.M.C. (2009). Value Similarities and Transmissions Among Family Members. Amsterdam: Ipskamp Drukkers B.V.
  54. Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
  55. Sameroff, A. (1975). Transactional models of early social relations. Human Development, 18, 65-79. DOI: 10.1159/000271476
  56. Scabini, E., & Cigoli, V. (2000). Il famigliare. Legami, simboli e transizioni. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.
  57. Scabini, E., & Iafrate, R. (2003). Psicologia dei legami familiari. Bologna: il Mulino.
  58. Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). New York: Academic Press.
  59. Schwartz, S.H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45. DOI: 10.1111/J.1540-4560.1994.TB01196.
  60. Schwartz, S.H. (2005). Basic Human Values: Their Content and Structure Across Culture. In A. Tamayo & J.B. Porto (Eds.), Valores e comportamento nas organizaҫões (pp. 21-55). Petropolis: Vozes.
  61. Schwartz, S.H. (2011). I valori umani di base: un’introduzione. In G.V. Caprara, E. Scabini, P. Steca, & S. H. Schwartz (Eds.), I valori dell’Italia contemporanea (pp. 13-44). Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  62. Schwartz, S.H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., Harris, M., & Owens, V. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 519-542.
  63. Schwartz, S.H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., ... & Dirilen-Gumus, O. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663.
  64. Schӧnpflung, U. (2001). Intergenerational transmission of values: The role of transmission belts. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(2), 174-185. DOI: 10.1177/0022022101032002005
  65. Starrels, M.E. (1994). Gender differences in parent-child relations. Journal of Family Issues, 15(1), 148-165. DOI: 10.1177/019251394015001007
  66. Tam, K.-P., & Lee, S.-L. (2010). What values do parents want to socialize in their children? The role of perceived normative values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(2), 175-181. DOI: 10.1177/0022022109354379
  67. Tam, K.-P., Lee, S.-L., Kim, Y.H., Li, Y., & Chao, M. M. (2012). Intersubjective model of value transmission: Parents using perceived norms as reference when socializing children. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(8), 1041-1052.
  68. In U. Schӧnpflung (Ed.). Cultural Transmission: Psychological, Developmental, Social, and Methodological Aspects (pp. 126-160). Cambridge: University Press.
  69. Vandenberg, S.G. (1972). Assortative mating, or who marries whom?. Behavior Genetics, 2(2-3), 127-157. DOI: 10.1007/BF01065686
  70. Vecchione, M., & Alessandri, G. (2017). Un contributo alla validazione italiana del Portrait Values Questionnaire-Revised (PVQ-R). Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 44(1), 159-180. DOI: 10.1421/8690
  71. Warren, B.L. (1966). A multiple variable approach to the assortative mating phenomenon. Eugenics Quarterly, 13(4), 285-290. DOI: 10.1080/19485565.1966.9987681
  72. Watkins, M.P., & Meredith, W. (1981). Spouse similarity in newlyweds with respect to specific cognitive abilities, socioeconomic status and education. Behavior Genetics, 11(1), 1-21. DOI: 10.1007/BF01065824
  73. Watson, D., Klohnen, E. C., Casillas, A., Nus Simms, E., Haig, J., & Berry, D.S. (2004). Match makers and deal breakers: Analyses of assortative mating in newlywed couples. Journal of Personality, 72(5), 1029-1068.
  74. Zonderman, A.B., Vandenberg, S.G., Spuhler, K.P., & Fain, P.R. (1977). Assortative marriage for cognitive abilities. Behavior Genetics, 7(3), 261-271. DOI: 10.1007/BF01066279
  75. Kuczynski, L., & Navara, G.S. (2006). Sources of innovation and change in socialization, internalization and acculturation. In M. Killen & J.C. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 299-327). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
  76. Laghi, F., Pallini, S., & De Sclavis, R. (2012). Values similarity between parents and adolescents: A preliminary investigation among Italian adolescents. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 43(6), 915-924.

  • “What matters to us”: The portrait values questionnaire to measure couple values Francesca Danioni, Claudia Russo, Ioana Zagrean, Camillo Regalia, Daniela Barni, in Personal Relationships /2023 pp.681
    DOI: 10.1111/pere.12483

Marta Robitschek, Francesca Danioni, Daniela Barni, Raffaella Iafrate, Condividere valori simili fa bene alle relazioni familiari: uno studio con genitori di figli adolescenti in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 2/2018, pp 255-283, DOI: 10.3280/RIP2018-002004