Incentives for energy efficiency in gas distribution race and effects on local public finance

Author/s Roberto Fazioli, Donato Lenza
Publishing Year 2018 Issue 2018/1
Language Italian Pages 36 P. 87-122 File size 340 KB
DOI 10.3280/EP2018-001004
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The goal of "Certificati Bianchi" (i.e. energy efficiency certificates - TEE) is to stimulate the investment to enhance efficiency in energy consumption in Italy. In this paper, we provide a thorough description and constructive criticism of the system. More in details, we carefully characterize (i) the annual obligations pertaining to the natural gas distribution companies for the acquisition of TEEs, (ii) the procedure to accomplish them and (iii) the role of the institutional players (such as, for example, the Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico and the ARERA) in the process. Then, we address the theme of the additional TEEs that a company bidding in competitive public tenders for natural gas distribution services can offer to Municipalities in "Minimum Territorial Area" (ATEM) and, in particular, we stress the implications of such offer for the financial plan of the bidder. Finally, we discuss some issues with the design of the system, and a possible way forward to address them.

Keywords: Energy efficiency, regulated utilities and infrastructures, sustainability, strategy, local public finance

Jel codes: G28, H23, K23, L51, L95

  1. Allcott H. (2013). The Welfare Effects of Misperceived product costs: data and calibrations from the automobile market. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(3): 30-66.
  2. Allcott H., Mullainathan S., Taubinsky D. (2012). Energy Policy with externalities and internalities, NBER Working Paper, n.17977, January.
  3. Allcott H., Wozny N. (2012). Gasoline Prices, Fuel Economy and Energy Paradox, NBER working paper, n. 18583, november.
  4. E.P.R.I. (2009). Assessment of Achievable Potential from Energy Efficiency and Demand Response Programs in the U.S. 2010-2030. Technical Report.
  5. Gillingham K., Newell R.G., Palmer K. (2009). Energy Efficiency Economics and Policy. Discussion Paper-Resources for the Future, RFF DP 09-13, pp. 1-25.
  6. Gillingham K., Palmer K. (2014). Bridging the energy efficiency gap: policy insights from economic theory and empirical evidence. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 8(1), winter.
  7. Golove W.H, Eto J.H. (1996). Market barriers to energy efficiency: a critical reappraisal of the rationale for public policies to promote energy efficiency. LBL-38059, Berkeley: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California.
  8. Helfand G., Wolverton A. (2009). Evaluating the consumer response to fuel economy: a review of the literature, National Center for Environmental Economics, Working Paper Series, 09-04.
  9. Jaffe A.B., Stavins R.N. (1994). The Energy paradox and the diffusion of Conservation Technology. Resource and Energy Economics, may, 16(2): 91-122.
  10. Jaffe A.B., Stavins R.N. (1994). The Energy-Efficiency Gap. What does it mean?. Energy Policy, 22(10): 804-810, October.
  11. McKinsey&Co. Report (2013, November). A cura di D. Frankel, S. Heck e H. Tai. Sizing the potential of behavioral energy-efficiency initiatives in the US residential market. McKinsey&Company Edition, Usa.
  12. McKinsey Sustainability & Resource Productivity (2010, march). Compendium. In: Kiely T. (ed. by). Energy Efficiency. A compelling global resource. McKinsey&Co. Edition.
  13. Schall D.L., Mohnen A. (2015). Incentives for energy-efficient behavior at the workplace: a natural field experiment on eco-driving in a company fleet. Energy Procedia, 75: 2626-2634.
  14. Sutherland W.J. (1996). From Individual Behaviour to Population Ecology. Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution, Oxford University Press.
  15. Wang S.J., Moriarty P. (2017). Strategies for Household Energy Conservation. Energy Procedia, May, 105: 2996-3002.
  16. World Bank Group (2009). Energy Strategy Approach Paper – Sustainable Development Network. The World Bank Group, october.

Roberto Fazioli, Donato Lenza, Incentivi all’efficienza energetica nelle gare per la distribuzione gas e gli effetti sulla finanza pubblica locale: analisi e prospettive in "ECONOMIA PUBBLICA " 1/2018, pp 87-122, DOI: 10.3280/EP2018-001004