Feelings on the web. The well-being of teenagers today amid opportunities and risks of social media

Author/s Maria Gabriella Pediconi, Michela Brunori
Publishing Year 2019 Issue 2019/2 Language Italian
Pages 27 P. 53-79 File size 363 KB
DOI 10.3280/PDS2019-002003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The aim of this research is to analyse the web in terms of how it contributes to teenagers’ affective well-being and development. Ninety-one undergraduate students participated in the study that placed some projective stimuli alongside the tools of interviews and surveys typical-ly used in this field. It has emerged that teenagers don’t seem to be trapped in the net, but ra-ther they use it as an opportunity to discover different ways of communicating, to experience relationships and to understand their own feelings. In particular, the peer group, home life and childhood memories, marked by the use of technology, are coloured by positive feelings, whereas sentimental relationships are characterised by ambivalent feelings. Adolescents com-bine family life and digital practices, hoping for the involvement of all significant relationships, starting from those experienced at home. Boys are not immune from the temptation of online addiction, but girls in particular tend to suffer negative effects. Although they show more dif-fidence, they put their intense anxiety of control into the hands of the web.

Keywords: Adolescents, social media, digital-mediated relationship, emotional wellbeing, use and/or abuse of social network sites

  1. Aroldi P. (2015). Famiglie connesse. Social Network e relazioni familiari online [Connected families. Social Network and online family relationships]. Mediaeducation, 6(1): 1-17.
  2. Barbera L.D., Paglia L.F. and Valsavoia R. (2009). Social network and addiction. Stud Health Technol Inform, 144: 33-36. DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-017-9-3
  3. Besana S. (2012). Schoology: the learning management system goes “social”. Italian Journal of Educational Technology, 20(1): 51-53. DOI: 10.17471/2499-4324/19
  4. Boccia Artieri G., Farci M., Giglietto F. e Rossi L. (2013). Intimità connessa. Intimità e amicizia tra gli utenti italiani di Facebook [Connected intimacy. Intimacy and friendship among Italian users of Facebook]. In Greco G. (a cura di), Pubbliche intimità. L’affettivo quotidiano nei siti di Social Network [Public intimacy. The daily affectivity in the Social Network sites]. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  5. Boffelli G. e Colombo C. (2009). Modalità, tempi e funzioni di utilizzo [Modalities, times and functions of use]. In Lancini M. e Turuani L., Sempre in contatto. Relazioni virtuali in adolescenza [Always in touch. Virtual relationships in adolescence]. Milano: Franco Angeli, pp. 75-83.
  6. Burke M. and Develin M. (2016, February). Once more with feeling: Supportive responses to social sharing on facebook. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 1462-1474. ACM. DOI: 10.1145/2818048.281997
  7. Cantelmi T. (2000). Presi nella Rete: studi sulla dipendenza psicologica da Internet. [Caught in the net: studies on the psychological addiction on the Internet]. Cultura e Libri, 128: 21-25.
  8. Cantelmi T., Del Miglio C., Talli M. e D’andrea A. (2000). Internet Related Psychopathology: primi dati sperimentali, aspetti clinici e note critiche [Internet Related Psychopathology: first experimental data, clinical aspects and critical notes]. Journal of Psychopathology, 6 (1): 40-51.
  9. Cantelmi T. (2009). L’era digitale e la sua valenza antropologica: i nativi digitali [Digital age and its anthropological value: the digital natives]. Relazione presentata al III Convegno Internazionale della Società Italiana di Psicotecnologie e Clinica dei Nuovi Media-SIP tech-Palermo.
  10. Capuano M. e Zontini G. (2017). Ma Quanti “mi piace”? [How many “likes”?]. -- Retrieved from: https://www.spiweb.it/geografie/ma-quanti-mi-piace-di-marta-capuano-gemma-zontini/
  11. Chang W.L. and Lin H.L. (2010). The impact of color traits on corporate branding. African Journal of Business Management, 4(15): 3344-3355.
  12. Chou H.T.G. and Edge N. (2012). “They are happier and having better lives than I am”: the impact of using Facebook on perceptions of others’ lives. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2): 117-121.
  13. Contri G.B. (1994). Il pensiero di natura. Dalla psicoanalisi al pensiero giuridico [The thought of nature. From psychoanalysis to legal thought]. Milano: Sic Edizioni.
  14. Cimbalo R.S., Beck K.L. and Sendziak D.S. (1978). Emotionally toned pictures and color selection for children and college students. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 133(2): 303-304. DOI: 10.1080/00221325.1978.1053338
  15. Cuomo M.T., Metallo G. e Tortora D. (2011). Opportunità, limiti e criticità dei social network [Opportunities, limits and critical issues of social networks]. Esperienze d’Impresa, 2: 25-48.
  16. Danby, S., Davidson, C., Theobald, M., Scriven, B., Cobb-Moore, C., Houen, S., Grant, S., Given, L.M. and Thorpe, K. (2013). Talk in activity during young children’s use of digital technologies at home. Australian Journal of Communication, 40(2): 83.
  17. De Cock R., Vangeel J., Klein A., Minotte P., Rosas O. and Meerkerk G.J. (2014). Compulsive use of social networking sites in Belgium: prevalence, profile, and the role of attitude toward work and school. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(3): 166-171.
  18. Della Dora L. (2017). Digital in 2017: in Italia e nel Mondo [Digital in 2017: in Italy and in the world]. -- Retrieved from: https://wearesocial.com/it/blog/2017/01/digital-in-2017-in-italia-e-nel-mondo
  19. Di Fraia G. (2012). Social network e processi identitari [Social Network and identity processes]. Minorigiustizia, (4): 14-21. DOI: 10.3280/MG2012-00400
  20. Di Lorenzo M., Lancini M., Suttora C. e Zanella T.E. (2013). La dipendenza da internet in adolescenza tra normalità e psicopatologia: uno studio italiano [Internet addiction in adolescence between normality and psychopathology: an Italian study]. Psichiatria e Psicoterapia, 32(2): 101-134.
  21. Ellison N.B., Steinfield C. and Lampe C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12(4): 1143-1168.
  22. Ferraro G., Caci B., D’amico A. and Di Blasi M. (2007). Internet addiction disorder: an Italian study. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(2): 170-175.
  23. Formica I., Rizzo A. e Conti F. (2010). Facebook o faceboom? Una ricerca esplorativa [Facebook or faceboom? An exploratory research]. -- Retrieved from: http://www.psychomedia.it/pm/telecomm/massmedia/formica-rizzo-conti.pdf
  24. Francomano J.A. and Harpin S.B. (2015). Utilizing social networking sites to promote adolescents’ health: a pragmatic review of the literature. Computers Informatics Nursing, 33(1): 10-20. DOI: 10.1097/CIN.000000000000011
  25. Gandolfi G. (2003). Il processo di selezione. Strumenti e tecniche (colloquio, test, assessment di selezione) [The selection process. Tools and techniques (interview, test, selection assessment)]. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  26. Gonzales A.L. and Hancock J.T. (2011). Mirror, mirror on my Facebook wall: Effects of exposure to Facebook on self-esteem. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(1-2): 79-83.
  27. Greco G., a cura di (2013). Pubbliche intimità. L’affettivo quotidiano nei siti di Social Network [Public intimacy. The daily affectivity in the Social Network sites]. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  28. Griffiths M. (2005). A ‘components’ model of addiction within a biopsychosocial frame work. Journal of Substance Use, 10(4): 191-197. DOI: 10.1080/1465989050011435
  29. Grimes A. and Doole I. (1998). Exploring the relationships between colour and international branding: A cross cultural comparison of the UK and Taiwan. Journal of Marketing Management, 14(7): 799-817. DOI: 10.1362/02672579878486758
  30. Gross E.F. (2004). Adolescent Internet use: What we expect, what teens report. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25(6): 633-649.
  31. Haddon L. and Vincent J. (eds.) (2014). European children and their carers’ understanding of use, risks and safety issues relating to convergent mobile media. Report D4.1. Milano: Unicatt.
  32. Iaquinta T. e Salvo A. (2017). Generazione TVB. Gli adolescenti digitali, l’amore e il sesso [I LOVE U generation. Digital adolescents, love and sex]. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  33. Imbasciati A. e Ghilardi A. (1994). Manuale clinico del TAT. La diagnosi psicoanalitica [Clinical Manual of the TAT. The psychoanalytic diagnosis]. Firenze: Giunti.
  34. Irwin C., Ball L., Desbrow B. and Leveritt M. (2012). Students’ perceptions of using Facebook as an interactive learning resource at university. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7): 1221-1232.
  35. Karaiskos D., Tzavellas E., Balta G. and Paparrigopoulos T. (2010). P02-232-Social network addiction: a new clinical disorder?. European Psychiatry, 25: 855. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-9338(10)70846-
  36. Kivran-Swaine F. and Naaman M. (2011). Network properties and social sharing of emotions in social awareness streams. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 379-382. Association for Computing Machinery (ACM). DOI: 10.1145/1958824.195888
  37. Ko C.H., Yen J.Y., Chen C.C., Chen S.H. and Yen C.F. (2005). Gender differences and related factors affecting online gaming addiction among Taiwanese adolescents. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 193(4): 273-277.
  38. Kuss D.J. and Griffiths M.D. (2012). Internet and gaming addiction: a systematic literature review of neuroimaging studies. Brain Sciences, 2(3): 347-374.
  39. Labrecque L.I. and Milne G.R. (2012). Exciting red and competent blue: the importance of color in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(5): 711-727.
  40. Lam L.T., Peng Z.W., Mai J.C. and Jing J. (2009). Factors associated with Internet addiction among adolescents. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(5): 551-555.
  41. Lin H., Tov W. and Qiu L. (2014). Emotional disclosure on social networking sites: the role of network structure and psychological needs. Computers in Human Behavior, 41: 342-350.
  42. Liu Q.X., Fang, X.Y., Deng L.Y. and Zhang J.T. (2012). Parent–adolescent communication, parental Internet use and Internet-specific norms and pathological Internet use among Chinese adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4): 1269-1275.
  43. Livingstone S., Mascheroni G., Dreier M., Chaudron S. and Lagae K. (2015). How parents of young children manage digital devices at home: The role of income, education and parental style. London: EU Kids Online, LSE, 1-25.
  44. Lukacs V. and Quan-Haase A. (2015). Romantic breakups on Facebook: new scales for studying post-breakup behaviors, digital distress, and surveillance. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5): 492-508. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2015.100854
  45. Luscher M. (1976). il test dei colori [The color test]. Roma: Astrolabio-Ubaldini.
  46. Manca S. (2014). Da Catfish a Her: quando le emozioni e i sentimenti viaggiano attraverso i bit [From Catfish to Her: when emotions and feelings travel through the bits]. Media Education – Studi, Ricerche, Buone Pratiche, 5(2): 149-163.
  47. Mascheroni G. (2013). Parenting the mobile internet in Italian households: Parents’ and children’s discourses. Journal of Children and Media, 8(4): 440-456. DOI: 10.1080/17482798.2013.83097
  48. Mauri M., Cipresso P., Balgera A., Villamira M. and Riva G. (2011). Why is Facebook so successful? Psychophysiological measures describe a core flow state while using Facebook. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(12): 723-731.
  49. Mesch G.S. (2006a). Family characteristics and intergenerational conflicts over the Internet. Information, Communication & Society, 9(4): 473-495. DOI: 10.1080/1369118060085870
  50. Mesch G.S. (2006b). Family relations and the Internet: Exploring a family boundaries approach. The Journal of Family Communication, 6(2): 119-138.
  51. Moreno M.A., Jelenchick L., Koff R., Eikoff J., Diermyer C. and Christakis D.A. (2012). Internet use and multitasking among older adolescents: An experience sampling approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(4): 1097-1102.
  52. Muise A., Christofides E. and Desmarais S. (2009). More information than you ever wanted: Does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy?. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(4): 441-444.
  53. Murray H.A. (1943). Thematic apperception test. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  54. Muscanelli N.L., Guadagno R.E., Rice L. and Murphy S. (2013). Don’t it make my brown eyes green? An analysis of Facebook use and romantic jealousy. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(4): 237-242.
  55. Nabi R.L., Prestin A. and So J. (2013). Facebook friends with (health) benefits? Exploring social network site use and perceptions of social support, stress, and well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(10): 721-727.
  56. Nawas M.M. (1971). Change in efficiency of ego functioning and complexity from adolescence to young adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 4(3): 412-425.
  57. Papp L.M., Danielewicz J. and Cayemberg C. (2012). “Are we Facebook official?” Implications of dating partners’ Facebook use and profiles for intimate relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(2): 85-90.
  58. Paus-Hasebrink I., Bauwens J., Dürager A.E. and Ponte C. (2013). Exploring types of parent–child relationship and Internet use across Europe. Journal of Children and Media, 7(1): 114-132. DOI: 10.1080/17482798.2012.73980
  59. Pediconi M.G. e Urbani A. (2016). Io social. Facebook nella vita quotidiana dei giovani [I (am) social. Facebook in the daily life of young people]. Psicologia Clinica dello svilppo, 20(3): 393-424. DOI: 10.1449/8504
  60. Pérez T., Araiza M.D.J. and Doerfer C. (2013). Using Facebook for learning: A case study on the perception of students in higher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106: 3259-3267.
  61. Poli R. and Agrimi E. (2012). Internet addiction disorder: prevalence in an Italian student population. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 66(1): 55-59. DOI: 10.3109/08039488.2011.60516
  62. Rajeev R., Soans S., Aroor A.R., Shastry R. and Shriyan A. (2016). Dependence on social networking sites in adolescents. Group, 100: 80-100.
  63. Ridgway J.L. and Clayton R.B. (2016). Instagram unfiltered: Exploring associations of body image satisfaction, Instagram# selfie posting, and negative romantic relationship outcomes. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(1), 2-7.
  64. Riva G. (2016). I Social Network [The Social Networks]. Ebook. Il Mulino, Bologna
  65. Roquebrune G. (1959). Aspects génétiques et typologiques des résultats obtenus à une épreuve projective [Genetic and typological aspects of the results obtained at a projective test]. Enfance, 12(1): 29-47.
  66. Rose S. and Dhandayudham A. (2014). Towards an understanding of Internet-based problem shopping behaviour: The concept of online shopping addiction and its proposed predictors. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 3(2): 83-89. DOI: 10.1556/JBA.3.2014.00
  67. Ruggiero I. (2012). Adolescenti e internet. Adolescenti, rete e social network [Adolescents and internet. Adolescents, net and social network]. SpiWeb, Società Psicoanalitica Italiana. -- Retrieved from: http://www.spiweb.it/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1834:adolescenti-e-nternet&catid
  68. Ruini C., Ottolini F., Rafanelli C., Ryff C.D. and Fava G.A. (2003). La validazione italiana delle Psychological Well-being Scales (PWB) [Italian validation of the Psychological Well-being Scales (PWB)]. Rivista di Psichiatria, 38(3): 117-130. DOI: 10.1708/173.186
  69. Rus H.M. and Tiemensma J. (2017). “It’s complicated”. A systematic review of Associations between social network site use and romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 75: 684-703.
  70. Rusconi A.C., Valeriani G., Carlone C., Raimondo P., Quartini A., de’ Fornari M.A.C. e Biondi M. (2012). Internet addiction disorder e social network: analisi statistica di correlazione e studio dell’associazione con l’ansia da interazione sociale [Internet addiction disorder and social network: statistical analysis of correlation and study of association with social interaction anxiety]. Rivista di Psichiatria, 47: 6. DOI: 10.1708/1178.1305
  71. Ryff C.D. (1989). Happiness Is Everything, or Is It? Explorations on the Meaning of Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6): 1069-1081. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
  72. Ryff C.D. (1995). Psychological well-being in adult life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(4): 99-104.
  73. Sabiniewicz A., Borkowska B., Serafińska K. and Sorokowski P. (2017). Is love related to selfies? Romantic selfie posting behavior and love levels among women and men. Personality and Individual Differences, 111: 297-300.
  74. Sánchez V., Muñoz-Fernández N. and Ortega-Ruiz R. (2017). Romantic Relationship Quality in the Digital Age: A Study with Young Adults. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 20: 1-10.
  75. Schade L.C., Sandberg J., Bean R., Busby D. and Coyne S. (2013). Using technology to connect in romantic relationships: Effects on attachment, relationship satisfaction, and stability in emerging adults. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 12(4): 314-338. DOI: 10.1080/15332691.2013.83605
  76. Schimmenti A. and Caretti V. (2010). Psychic retreats or psychic pits?: Unbearable states of mind and technological addiction. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 27(2): 115.
  77. Sherman E. (2011). Facebook Addiction: Factors influencing an individual’s Addiction. Honor Thesis Program in The College of Management. -- Retrieved from: http://scholarworks.umb.edu/management_hontheses/5
  78. Simoniello V. (2014). La narrazione di sé nell’era della comunicazione digitale:(ri) definizione identitaria ai tempi dei social media [Self-narration in the age of digital communication: (re)definition identity at the time of social media]. Istituto di Scienze Umane ed Esistenziali, Napoli, 1-6. -- Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/6825306/La_narrazione_di_s%C3%A9_nellera_della_comunicazione_digitale_ri_definizione_identitaria_ai_tempi_dei_social_media
  79. Snyder S.M., Li W., O’Brien J.E. and Howard M.O. (2015). The effect of US university students’ problematic Internet use on family relationships: A mixed-methods investigation. PloS one, 10(12): 1-13.
  80. Spitzer M. (2016). Solitudine digitale. Disadattati, isolati, capaci solo di una vita virtuale? [Digital loneliness. Maladjusted, isolated, capable only of a virtual life?]. Milano: Corbaccio, Garzanti.
  81. Strasburger V.C., Jordan A.B. and Donnerstein E. (2010). Health effects of media on children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 125(4): 756-767.
  82. Toma C.L. and Choi M. (2015). The couple who Facebooks together, stays together: Facebook self-presentation and relationship longevity among college-aged dating couples. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(7): 367-372.
  83. Tromholt M., Lundby M., Andsbjerg K. and Wiking M. (2015). The facebook experiment: does social media affect the quality of our lives? The Happiness Research Institute. -- Retrieved from: http://www.happinessresearchinstitute.com
  84. Tufekci Z. (2008). Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 28(1): 20-36. DOI: 10.1177/027046760731148
  85. Turkle S. (2016). La conversazione necessaria. La forza del dialogo nell’era digitale [Reclaiming conversation. The power of talk in a digital age]. Torino: Piccola Biblioteca Einaudi, I Maverick.
  86. Utz S. and Beukeboom C.J. (2011). The role of social network sites in romantic relationships: Effects on jealousy and relationship happiness. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 16(4): 511-527.
  87. Valenzuela S., Park N. and Kee K.F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 14(4): 875-901.
  88. Vandewater E.A., Rideout V.J., Wartella E.A., Huang X., Lee J.H. and Shim M.S. (2007). Digital childhood: electronic media and technology use among infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. Pediatrics, 119(5): e1006-e1015.
  89. Valkenburg P.M., and Peter J. (2007). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43(2): 267. DOI: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.26
  90. Valkenburg P.M., Peter J. and Schouten A.P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(5): 584-590.
  91. Yen J.Y., Yen C.F., Chen C.C., Chen S.H. and Ko C.H. (2007). Family factors of internet addiction and substance use experience in Taiwanese adolescents. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(3): 323-329.
  92. Young K.S. (1998a). Internet Addiction: The Emergence of a New Clinical Disorder. CyberPsychology & Behaviour, 1(3): 237-244.
  93. Young K.S. (1998b). Caught in the net: How to recognize the signs of internet addiction and a winning strategy for recovery. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Trad. it. Presi nella rete: intossicazione e dipendenza da Internet. Bologna: Calderini ed agricole.
  94. Zeman J., Klimes‐Dougan B., Cassano M. and Adrian M. (2007). Measurement issues in emotion research with children and adolescents. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 14(4): 377-401.
  95. Di Bari, C. (2015). Prima infanzia e tecnologie digitali [Early childhood and digital technologies]. Profiling. I profili dell’abuso 6(4).

Maria Gabriella Pediconi, Michela Brunori, Affetti nella rete. Il benessere degli adolescenti tra rischi e opportunità social in "PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE" 2/2019, pp 53-79, DOI: 10.3280/PDS2019-002003