Qualitative data re-use: opportunities and challenges

Author/s Fabio Gaspani, Carlo Pisano, Domingo Scisci
Publishing Year 2019 Issue 2019/119 Language Italian
Pages 17 P. 101-117 File size 202 KB
DOI 10.3280/SR2019-119005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The article explores opportunities and challenges related to the re-use of qualitative data in social research. It also focuses on the strategies developed by research infrastructures to promote and facilitate informed data use. In the Italian context, the practices related to the re-use of qualitative data are not sufficiently explored and require that the scientific community deal with some important ethical, legal, epistemological and methodological issues. In order to share data, it is important to adopt, from the earliest stages of research, a plan for the management of qualitative materials with a data life cycle perspective.

  1. C.T. Beck (2019), Secondary Qualitative Data Analysis in the Health and Social Sciences, London, Routledge.
  2. Ais – Associazione italiana di sociologia (2013), Codice deontologico, -- https://ais-751.kxcdn.com/uploads/2011/01/codice-deontologico-21072013.pdf.
  3. S. Aliprandi (2012), Capire il copyright. Percorso guidato nel diritto d'autore, Milano, Ledizioni.
  4. D.L. Altheide, J.M. Johnson (1994), Criteria for Assessing Interpretative Validity in Qualitative Research, in N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, London, Sage.
  5. D.L. Altheide, J.M. Johnson (2011), Reflections on Interpretative Adequacy in Qualitative Research, in N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, London, Sage.
  6. Asa – American Sociological Association (2008), Code of Ethics of the ASA Committee on Professional Ethics, -- http://www.asanet.org/sites/default/files/code_of_ethics_aug_2017_2_1.pdf.
  7. A. Ball (2012), Review of Data Management Lifecycle Models (version 1.0), REDm-MED Project Document redm1rep120110ab10, Bath, University of Bath, -- https://purehost.bath.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/206543/redm1rep120110ab10.pdf.
  8. R. Bichi (2000), «Il trattamento del testo parlato: questioni aperte nell’analisi del materiale non-standard», Studi di Sociologia, XXXVIII, 4, pp. 387-99, -- https://www.jstor.org/stable/23004972.
  9. L. Bishop (2009), «Ethical Sharing and Reuse of Qualitative Data», Australian Journal of Social Issues, XLIV, 3, pp. 255-272,
  10. M. Brugidou, D. Le Roux, A.-C. Salomon (2005), Colloque «L’analyse secondaire en recherche qualitative. Utopie ou perspectives nouvelles?», Grenoble, 3-4/11, -- https://reanalyse.hypotheses.org/colloque-analyse-secondaire-2005.
  11. D. Calvey (2008), «The Art and Politics of Covert Research: Doing “Situated Ethics” in the Field», Sociology, XLII, 5, pp. 905-18,
  12. L. Camfield, R. Palmer-Jones (2013), «Improving the Quality of Development Research: What Could Archiving Qualitative Data for Reanalysis and Revisiting Research Sites Contribute?», Progress in Development Studies, XIII, 4, pp. 323-38, DOI: 10.1177/1464993413490481
  13. M. Cardano (2011), La ricerca qualitativa, Bologna, il Mulino.
  14. A. Carusi, M. Jirotka (2009), «From Data Archive to Ethical Labyrinth», Qualitative Research, IX, 3, pp. 285-98, DOI: 10.1177/1468794109105032
  15. Cessda Training Working Group – Council of European Social Science Data Archives (2018), Cessda Data Management Expert Guide, Bergen, Cessda Eric, -- https://www.cessda.eu/Training/Training-Resources/Library/Data-Management-Expert-Guide.
  16. A. Charlesworth (2012), Intellectual Property Rights for Digital Preservation, Dpc Technology Watch Report 12-02, Digital Preservation Coalition,
  17. L. Corti (2006), «Editorial», Methodological Innovations Online, I, 2, pp. 1-9,
  18. L. Corti (2007), «Re-using Archived Qualitative Data – Where, How, Why?», Archival Sci-ence, VII, 1, pp. 37-54,
  19. L. Corti (2018), Data Collection in Secondary Analysis, in U. Flick (ed.) (2018).
  20. L. Corti, G. Backhouse (2005), «Acquiring Qualitative Data for Secondary Analysis», Forum: Qualitative Social Research/Sozialforschung, VI, 2, Art. 36,
  21. L. Corti, P. Thompson (2006), Secondary Analysis of Archived Data, in G. Gobo, C. Seale, D. Silverman, J. Gubrium (eds.), Qualitative Research Practice: Concise Paperback Edition, London, Sage.
  22. M. Dargentas, D. Le-Roux, A.-C. Salomon, M. Brugidou (2007), Sur les prospectives de la recherche qualitative en France: capitalisation et ré-utilisation d’entretiens de recherche, Recherches Qualitatives, Arq Association pour la Recherche Qualitative, -- https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00170701.
  23. S. De Luca (2010), Gli archivi di dati qualitativi, in A. de Lillo (a c. di), Il mondo della ricerca qualitativa, Torino, Utet.
  24. N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (2018), Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research, in N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, London, Sage.
  25. J.M. DuBois, M. Strait, H. Walsh (2017), «Is It Time to share Qualitative Research Data?», Qualitative Psychology, V, 3, pp. 380-93,
  26. R.R. Faden, T.L. Beauchamp (1986), A History and Theory of Informed Consent, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  27. U. Flick (2014), Mapping the Field, in U. Flick (ed.) (2018).
  28. U. Flick (ed.) (2018), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection, London, Sage.
  29. M. Hammersley (1997), «Qualitative Data Archiving: Some Reflections on its Prospects and Problems», Sociology, XXXI, 1, pp. 131-42, DOI: 10.1177/0038038597031001010
  30. M. Hammersley (2010), «Can We Re-use Qualitative Data via Secondary Analysis? Notes on Some Terminological and Substantive Issues», Sociological Research Online, XV, 1, pp. 1-7,
  31. R. Harvey (2008), Appraisal and Selection, Dcc Briefing Papers: Introduction to Curation, Edinburgh, Digital Curation Centre, -- http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/briefing-papers/introduction-curation.
  32. J. Heaton (2004), Reworking Qualitative Data, London, Sage.
  33. P.S. Hinds, R.J. Vogel, L. Clarke-Steffen (1997), «The Possibilities and Pitfalls of Doing a Secondary Analysis of a Qualitative Data Set», Qualitative Health Research, VII, 3, pp. 408-24, DOI: 10.1177/104973239700700306
  34. L. Hoyle, L. Corti, A. Gregory, A. Martinez, J. Wackerow, E. Alvar, N. Betancort Cabrera, D. Gallagher, T. Gebel, J. Hautamaki, A. Kuula, S. McEachern, C. Zuell (2013), A Qualitative Data Model for Ddi, Data Documentation Initiative Working Paper No. 5, -- https://www.ddialliance.org/sites/default/files/AQualitativeDataModelForDDI.pdf.
  35. A.J. Jipson, C.E. Litton (2000), Body, Career and Community. The Implications of Researching Dangerous Groups, in G. Lee-Treweek, S. Linkogle (eds.) Danger in the Field: Risk and Ethics in Social Research, London, Routledge.
  36. K. Jones, S.M. Alexander, N. Bennett, L. Bishop, A. Budden, M. Cox, M. Crosas, E. Game, J. Geary, C. Hahn, D. Hardy, J. Johnson, S. Karcher, M. LaFevor, N. Motzer, P. Pinto da Silva, J. Pittman, H. Randell, J. Silva, J. Smith, M. Smorul, C. Strasser, C. Strawhacker, A. Stuhl, N. Weber, D. Winslow (2018), Qualitative Data Sharing and Re-use for Socio-environmental Systems Research: A Synthesis of Opportunities, Challenges, Resources and Approaches, Sesync White Paper, DOI: 10.13016/M2WH2DG59
  37. A. Ketola, M. Kleemola, A. Kuula-Luumi, T.J. Alaterä, J. Päivärinta, J. Hautamäki, S. Haverinen, J. Sivonen (2018), Data Management Guidelines, 26 July, Tampere, Finnish Social Science Data Archive, -- http://www.fsd.uta.fi/aineistonhallinta/en/.
  38. S. Kowal, D.C. O’Connell (2014), Transcription as a Crucial Step of Data Analysis, in U. Flick (ed.) (2018).
  39. S. Mannheimer, A. Pienta, D. Kirilova, C. Elman, A. Wutich (2018), «Qualitative Data Sharing: Data Repositories and Academic Libraries as Key Partners in Addressing Challenges», American Behavioral Scientist, LXIII, 5, pp. 643-64, DOI: 10.1177/0002764218784991
  40. N.S. Mauthner, O. Parry, K. Backett-Milburn (1998), «The Data are Out There, or are They? Implications for Archiving and Revisiting Qualitative Data», Sociology, XXXII, 4, pp. 733-45, DOI: 10.1177/0038038598032004006
  41. D.M. Mertens (2018), Ethics of Qualitative Data Collection, in U. Flick (ed.) (2018).
  42. G. Michetti (a c. di) (2007), Oais – Sistema informativo aperto per l’archiviazione, Roma, Iccu.
  43. O. Parry, N.S. Mauthner (2004), «Whose Data Are They Anyway? Practical, Legal and Ethical Issues in Archiving Qualitative Research Data», Sociology, XXXVIII, 1, pp. 139-52, DOI: 10.1177/0038038504039366
  44. H. Pätzold (2007), «Secondary Analysis of Audio Data. Technical Procedures for Virtual Anonymisation and Modification», Forum: Qualitative Social Research/Sozialforschung, 6, 1, Art. 24,
  45. P. Pels, I. Boog, J. Henrike Florusbosch, Z. Kripe, T. Minter, M. Postma, M. Sleeboom-Faulkner, B. Simpson, H. Dilger, M. Schönhuth, A. von Poser, R.C.A. Castillo, R. Lederman, H. Richards-Rissetto (2018), «Data Management in Anthropology: the Next Phase in Ethics Governance?», Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale, XXVI, 3, pp. 391-413, DOI: 10.1111/1469-8676.12526
  46. K. Resch, E. Enzenhofer (2018), Collecting Data in Other Languages – Strategies for Cross-language Research in Multilingual Societies, in U. Flick (ed.) (2018).
  47. S. Rokkan (1976), «Data Services in Western Europe. Reflections on Variations in the Conditions of Academic Institution-Building», The American Behavioral Scientist, XIX, 4, pp. 443-54, DOI: 10.1177/000276427601900405
  48. T.J. Roulet, M.J. Gill, S. Stenger, D.J. Gill (2017), «Reconsidering the Value of Covert Re-search: The Role of Ambiguous Consent in Participant Observation», Organizational Re-search Methods, XX, 3, pp. 487-517, DOI: 10.1177/1094428117698745
  49. J. Salmons (2014), New Social Media, New Social Science… and New Ethical Issues!, London, Sage.
  50. B. Saunders, J. Kitzinger, C. Kitzinger (2015), «Anonymising Interview Data: Challenges and Compromise in Practice». Qualitative Research, XV, 5, pp. 616-32, DOI: 10.1177/1468794114550439
  51. C. Seale, G. Gobo, J.F. Gubrium, D. Silverman (eds.) (2004), Qualitative Research Practice, London, Sage.
  52. A. Sinibaldi, P.B. Buongiorno (2012), Manuale di conservazione digitale, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  53. D. Sperber (1982), Le savoir des anthropologues, Paris, Hermann.
  54. K. Tiidenberg (2018), Ethics in Digital Research, in U. Flick (ed.) (2018).
  55. H. Tjalsma, J. Rombouts (2011), Selection of Research Data. Guidelines for Appraising and Selecting Research Data, Dans Studies in Digital Archiving, -- http://www.dans.knaw.nl/nl/over/organisatie-beleid/publicaties/DANSselectionofresearchdata.pdf.
  56. UK Data Archive (2015), Qualitative Data Collection Ingest Processing Procedures, version 08.00, 30 March 2015, Colchester, University of Essex, -- https://data-archive.ac.uk/media/54767/cd093-qualitativedatacollectioningestprocessingprocedures_08_00w.pdf.
  57. UK Data Service (2018), How to access, -- https://www.ukdataservice.ac.uk/get-data/how-to-access.
  58. V. Van den Eynden, L. Corti, M. Woollard, L. Bishop, L. Horton (2011), Managing and Sharing Data: Best Practice for Researchers, UK Data Archive, Colchester, University of Essex, -- https://data-archive.ac.uk/media/2894/managingsharing.pdf.

Fabio Gaspani, Carlo Pisano, Domingo Scisci, Il riutilizzo dei dati qualitativi: opportunità e sfide in "SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE " 119/2019, pp 101-117, DOI: 10.3280/SR2019-119005