Need for space. How artists rely on space to face precarious work conditions

Author/s Damiano Razzoli, Stefano Rodighiero, Lorenzo Mizzau, Fabrizio Montanari
Publishing Year 2020 Issue 2020/157 Language English
Pages 22 P. 164-185 File size 294 KB
DOI 10.3280/SL2020-157009
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

Artistic labour markets present some features that can be considered paradigmatic of work in the contemporary gig economy. Extant literature identified these features by focusing on how artists can be deemed exemplars of new and more flexible ways of organising a workforce. While studies examined workers’ conditions in contemporary economy, the literature on artistic work has not delved into the role of space in artist’s work experience. Thus, this study aims to look at how space can be harnessed by artistic workers to respond to the most pressing needs they express. To this end, the paper presents the results of a qualitative study conducted on young artistic workers in the city of Reggio Emilia. The authors propose three mechanisms (anchoring, framing, belonging) through which space can serve as a personal compass that helps mitigate the effects of the precariousness of work.

Keywords: Space, artistic work, precariousness, gig economy

  1. Alacovska A. (2018). Informal creative labour practices: A relational work perspective. Human Relations, 71(12): 1563-1589. DOI: 10.1177/0018726718754991
  2. Alberti G., Bessa I., Hardy K., Trappmann V., Umney C. (2018). In, against and beyond precarity: work in insecure times. Work, Employment and Society, 32(3), 447-457. DOI: 10.1177/0950017018762088
  3. Armano E., Murgia A. (2015). The precariousnesses of young knowledge workers. A subject-oriented approach. In: Johnson M., edited by, Precariat: Labour, work and politics. New York: Routledge.
  4. Bain A. (2005). Constructing an artistic identity. Work, Employment & Society, 19(1): 25-46.
  5. Bain A., McLean D. (2013). The Artistic Precariat. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 6: 93-111.
  6. Ballatore M., del Rio Carral M., Murgia A. (2014). Présentation. Quand passion et précarité se rencontrent dans les métiers du savoir. Recherches Sociologiques et Anthropologiques, 45(2): 1-13.
  7. Banks M., Hesmondhalgh D. (2009). Looking for work in creative industries policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 15(4): 415-430.
  8. Becker H.S. (1982). Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  9. Biernacki P., Waldorf D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2): 141-163. DOI: 10.1177/004912418101000205
  10. Bourdieu P. (1983). The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed. Poetics, 12(4-5): 311-356. DOI: 10.1016/0304-422X(83)90012-8
  11. Bridgstock R. (2013). Not a dirty word: Arts entrepreneurship and higher education. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, 12: 122-137.
  12. Brown J. (2017). Curating the “Third Place”? Co-working and the mediation of creativity. Geoforum, 82: 112-126.
  13. Brown A.S., Tepper S.J. (2012). Placing the arts at the heart of the creative campus. New York, NY: Association of Performing Arts Presenters.
  14. Bureau M.C., Corsani A. (2016). New forms of employment in a globalised world: three figures of knowledge workers. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation, 10(2): 101-112.
  15. Casula C. (2018). Torn Between Neoliberal and Postmodern Trends, Corporatist Defence and Creative Age Prospects: The Ongoing Reshaping of the Classical Music Profession in Italy. Cambio, 8(16): 71-82.
  16. Chiaro G., Prati G., Zocca M. (2015). Smart working: dal lavoro flessibile al lavoro agile. Sociologia del lavoro, 138, 69-87. DOI: 10.3280/SL2015-138005
  17. Chicchi F., Savioli M., Turrini M. (2014). Soggettività intermittenti. Un’inchiesta sulla scomposizione del lavoro nell’ambito delle industrie creative. Sociologia del lavoro, 133: 42-57. DOI: 10.3280/SL2014-133003
  18. CIPD (2016). Employees outlook. Employees views on working life. Focus on skills and careers. -- Accessible at:
  19. Cloonan M., Williamson J. (2017). Introduction. Popular Music and Society, 40(5): 493-498. DOI: 10.1080/03007766.2017.1351117
  20. Cnossen B., Bencherki N. (2019). The role of space in the emergence and endurance of organizing: How independent workers and material assemblages constitute organizations. Human Relations, 72(6): 1057-1080. DOI: 10.1177/0018726718794265
  21. Corbin J.M., Strauss A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1): 3-21. DOI: 10.1007/BF00988593
  22. Currid E. (2007). The Warhol Economy, How Fashion, Art, and Music Drive New York City. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  23. Drake G. (2003). ‘This place gives me space’: Place and creativity in the creative industries. Geoforum, 34(4), 511-524. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7185(03)00029-0
  24. Elsbach K.D. (2009). Identity affirmation through ‘signature style’: A study of toy car designers. Human Relations, 62(7): 1041-1072. DOI: 10.1177/0018726709335538
  25. ERVET (2018). Economia Arancione in Emilia-Romagna. -- Accessible at:
  26. Evans G. (2009). Creative cities, creative spaces and urban policy. Urban Studies, 46(5-6): 1003-1040. DOI: 10.1177/0042098009103853
  27. Ferreri M., Graziano V. (2014). Passion without Objects. Young Graduates and the Politics of Temporary Art Spaces. Recherches sociologiques et anthropologiques, 45-2: 85-101.
  28. Fuller M.G., Löw M. (2017). Introduction: An invitation to spatial sociology. Current Sociology, 65(4): 1-23, DOI: 10.1177/0011392117697461
  29. Garrett L.E., Spreitzer G.M., Bacevice P.A. (2017). Co-constructing a sense of community at work: The emergence of community in coworking spaces. Organization Studies, 38(6): 821-842. DOI: 10.1177/0170840616685354
  30. Gill R., Pratt A.C. (2008). In the social factory? Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural work. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7-8): 1-30.
  31. Gill R., Pratt A.C., Virani T.E. (edited by) (2019). Creative Hubs in Question: Place, Space and Work in the Creative Economy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  32. Goffman E. (1963). Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: Free Press.
  33. Goffman E. (1974). Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
  34. Grabher G., Melchior A., Schiemer B., Schüßler E., Sydow J. (2018). From being there to being aware: Confronting geographical and sociological imaginations of copresence. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(1): 245-255. DOI: 10.1177/0308518X17743507
  35. Grodach C., Foster N., Murdoch J. III (2014). Gentrification and the Artistic Dividend: The Role of the Arts in Neighborhood Change. Journal of the American Planning Association, 80(1): 21-35. DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2014.928584
  36. Hesmondhalgh D., Baker S. (2011). Creative Labour. Media work in three cultural industries. London and New York: Routledge.
  37. Hodgson D.E. (2004). Project work: The legacy of bureaucratic control in the post-bureaucratic organization. Organization, 11(1): 81-100.
  38. Hutton T. (2016). Cities and the Cultural Economy. London: Routledge.
  39. Inkson K. (2006). Protean and boundaryless careers as metaphors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69: 48-63.
  40. Jones C. (2010). Finding a place in history: Symbolic and social networks in creative careers and collective memory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(5): 726-748.
  41. Perrenoud M., Bois G. (2017). Ordinary artists: From Paradox to Paradigm? Biens symboliques / Symbolic Goods, 1: 2-35.
  42. Jones C., Svejenova S. (2017). The architecture of city identities: A multimodal study of Barcelona and Boston. In: Höllerer M., Daudigeos T., Jancsary D., edited by, Multimodality, meaning, and institutions. Bingley: Emerald.
  43. Kalff Y. (2017). The knowledge worker and the projectified self: domesticating and disciplining creativity. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation, 11(1): 10-27.
  44. Lefebvre H. (1974). The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
  45. Lingo E.L., Tepper S.J. (2013). Looking back, looking forward: Arts-based careers and creative work. Work and Occupations, 40(4): 337-363.
  46. Löw M. (2016). The Sociology of Space: Materiality, Social Structures, and Action. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  47. Luciano A., Bertolini S. (a cura di) (2011). Incontri dietro le quinte. Imprese e professionisti nel settore dello spettacolo. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  48. Luise A., Minardi E. (a cura di) (1986). Il lavoro artistico. Sociologia del lavoro, 25, Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  49. Mariotti I., Pacchi C., Di Vita S. (2017). Co-working spaces in Milan: Location patterns and urban effects. Journal of Urban Technology, 24(3): 47-66. DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2017.1311556
  50. Markusen A. (2006). Urban development and the politics of a creative class: evidence from a study of artists. Environment and Planning A, 38(10): 1921-1940.
  51. Markusen A., Johnson A. (2006). Artists’ Centers: Evolution and Impact on Careers, Neighborhoods, and Economies. Minneapolis: Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota.
  52. Markusen A., Schrock G. (2006). The artistic dividend: Urban artistic specialisation and economic development implications. Urban Studies, 43(10): 1661-1686. DOI: 10.1080/00420980600888478
  53. Massey D. (2005). For Space. London: SAGE.
  54. McRobbie A. (2004). Everyone is Creative: Artists as pioneers of the new economy. In: Silva E., Bennett T. (ed.), Contemporary culture and everyday life. London: Routledge.
  55. Menger P.M. (1999). Artistic labor markets and careers. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1): 541-574.
  56. Merkel J. (2019). ‘Freelance isn’t free.’ Co-working as a critical urban practice to cope with informality in creative labour markets. Urban Studies, 56(3): 526-547. DOI: 10.1177/0042098018782374
  57. Molotch H. (2002). Place in product. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(4): 665-668. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00410
  58. Molotch H., Freudenburg W., Paulsen K.E. (2000). History repeats itself, but how? City character, urban tradition, and the accomplishment of place. American Sociological Review, 65(6): 791-823. DOI: 10.2307/2657514
  59. Montanari F., Scapolan A., Gianecchini M. (2016). ‘Absolutely free’? The role of relational work in sustaining artistic innovation. Organization Studies, 37(6): 797-821. DOI: 10.1177/0170840616647419
  60. Municipality of Reggio Emilia (2009). Reggio Emilia Città Creativa. Unpublished research report.
  61. Murgia A., Maestripieri L., Armano E. (2016). The Precariousness of Knowledge Workers: Hybridisation, Self-employment and Subjectification. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation, 10(2): 1-8.
  62. Nash L. (2018). Performing Place: A Rhythmanalysis of the City of London. Organization Studies, 41(3): 301-321. DOI: 10.1177/0170840618789161
  63. Pacchi C. (2018). New workspaces in Milan and Berlin: Coworking spaces between defensive strategies and transformative potential. In: Fisker J.K., Chiappini L., Pugalis L., Bruzzese A., edited by, The Production of Alternative Urban Spaces (pp. 58-72). London: Routledge.
  64. Petriglieri G., Ashford S.J., Wrzesniewski A. (2019). Agony and ecstasy in the gig economy: Cultivating holding environments for precarious and personalized work identities. Administrative Science Quarterly, 64(1): 124-170. DOI: 10.1177/0001839218759646
  65. Roberts B.H. (2014). Managing Systems of Secondary Cities: Policy Responses in International Development. Brussels: Cities Alliance.
  66. Ross A. (2003). No-collar: The Humane Workplace and Its Hidden Costs. New York: Basic Books.
  67. Rowlands L., Handy J. (2012). An addictive environment: New Zealand film production workers’ subjective experiences of project-based labour. Human Relations, 65(5): 657-680. DOI: 10.1177/0018726711431494
  68. Salganik M.J., Heckathorn D.D. (2004). Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent‐driven sampling. Sociological Methodology, 34(1): 193-240.
  69. Scott A.J. (2000). The Cultural Economy of Cities. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
  70. Scott A.J. (2008). Social Economy of the Metropolis: Cognitive-Cultural Capitalism and the Global Resurgence of Cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  71. Small M.L., Adler L. (2019). The role of space in the formation of social ties. Annual Review of Sociology, 45: 111-132.
  72. Soja E. (1996). Third space. Oxford: Blackwell.
  73. Spinuzzi C., Bodrozic Z., Scaratti G., Ivaldi S. (2018). Coworking is about community” but what is “community” in coworking? Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(12): 112-140. DOI: 10.1177/1050651918816357
  74. Storey J., Salaman G., Platman K. (2005). Living with enterprise in an enterprise economy: Freelance and contract workers in the media. Human Relations, 58(8): 1033-1054. DOI: 10.1177/0018726705058502
  75. Storper M., Venables A. (2004). Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4, 351-370.
  76. Throsby D., Zednik A. (2011). Multiple job-holding and artistic careers: Some empirical evidence. Cultural Trends, 20, 9-24. DOI: 10.1080/09548963.2011.540809
  77. Tremblay D-G., Dehesa A.D.H. (2016). Being a Creative and an Immigrant in Montreal: What Support for the Development of a Creative Career? Sage Open, 6(3): 1-15. DOI: 10.1177/2158244016664237
  78. van Dijk S. (2019). At home in the workplace: The value of materiality for immaterial labor in Amsterdam. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 22(4): 468-483. DOI: 10.1177/1367549419861628
  79. Wijnberg N.M., Gemser G. (2000). Adding value to innovation: Impressionism and the transformation of the selection system in visual arts. Organization Science 11(3): 323-329.
  80. Wittel A. (2001). Towards a network sociality. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(6): 51-76. DOI: 10.1177/026327601018006003
  81. Wojan T.R., Lambert D.M., McGranahan D.A. (2007). Emoting with their feet: Bohemian attraction to creative milieu. Journal of Economic Geography, 7(6): 711-736.
  82. Yin R.K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
  83. Zukin S. (1988). Loft Living: Culture and Capital in Urban Change. London: Radius.

Damiano Razzoli, Stefano Rodighiero, Lorenzo Mizzau, Fabrizio Montanari, Need for space. How artists rely on space to face precarious work conditions in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 157/2020, pp 164-185, DOI: 10.3280/SL2020-157009