Extrapolation! Phenomenology, sociology of critique and states of mind in the solidarity economy

Author/s Bruno Frère
Publishing Year 2020 Issue 2020/158 Language English
Pages 27 P. 21-47 File size 323 KB
DOI 10.3280/SL2020-158002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the value and the limit of the sociology of critique as a form of post-Bourdieusian critical sociology, especially where moral values play a crucial role in explaining actions - as they do in the solidarity econ-omy, the field analyzed here. Contrary to interpretations of justifications as moral toolkits unconsciously mobilized by actors about practices whose real reasons lie elsewhere, I suggest that the sociology of critique’s notion of "grammar" is useful for articulating the normative moral elements that motivate specific actions and justifications. We will see how taking the actors themselves seriously - the sociolo-gy of critique’s motto - can yield important insights for sociology. But then we face a problem within the field that the sociology of critique can’t resolve alone: there sometimes appears to be a contradiction between actors’ actions and their justifications. Phenomenology can help us to understand these justifications at a deeper level as expressions of fundamental ways of relating to the world. In this sense phenomenology is useful to a moral sociology of critique because it helps us find a solution to the "contradiction" that the sociology of critique left unsolved.

Keywords: Phenomenology, sociology of critique, reflexivity, Scheler, grammar, states of mind, solidarity economy, justification, critique, practice

  1. Bauhardt C. (2014). Solutions to the Crisis? The Green New Deal, Degrowth, and the Solidarity Economy: Alternatives to the Capitalist Growth Economy from an Ecofeminist Economics Perspective. Ecological Economics. 102: 60-68.
  2. Boltanski L. (2012). Love and Justice as competences. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  3. Boltanski L. (2013). Foetal condition: A Sociology of Engendering and Abortion. London: Polity Press.
  4. Boltanski L., Chiapello E. (2007). The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.
  5. Boltanski L., Thévenot L. (2006). On Justification. Economies of Worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  6. Bourdieu P. (1979). La Distinction. Paris: Minuit.
  7. Bourdieu P. (1998). Contre-feux. Paris: Raisons d’agir.
  8. Bourdieu P. (2000). Les structures sociales de l’économie. Paris: Seuil.
  9. Bourdieu P. (2017). Anthropologie économique. Cours au college de France, 1992-1993. Paris: Raisons d’agir/Seuil.
  10. Defourny J., et al. (2009). The Worldwide Making of the Social Economy, Innovations and Changes. Leuven: Acco.
  11. Eynaud P, Laville J.L., et al. (2019). Theory of Social Entreprise and Pluralism. Social Movements, Solidarity Economy and the Global South. London: Routledge.
  12. Frère B. (2009). Le Nouvel esprit solidaire, Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.
  13. Frère B. (2018). Back to Materialism. Reflections on Marx’s Representation of 1109 Labour, Praxis, Cooperative and Libertarian Socialism in the 19th Century. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 31(1): 69-94.
  14. Frère B. (2019). «Politics without politics». Affordances and limitations of the solidarity economy’s libertarian socialist grammar. In: Frère B., Jacquemain M. (eds.). The Everyday Resistance: French Activism in the 21st century. London: Palgrave: 229-262.
  15. Frère B., Jaster D. (2018). French Sociological Pragmatism: Inheritor and Innovator in the American Pragmatic and Sociological Phenomenological Traditions. Journal of Classical Sociology, 19 (2): 138-160.
  16. Frère B., Reinecke J. (2011). Libertarian Socialism and Solidarity Economy. Dialogues in Critical Management Studies, 1 (1): 117-127.
  17. Frings M. (1988). La fondation historico-philosophique du capitalisme selon Max Scheler. Cahiers internationaux de sociologie, LXXXV: 353-364.
  18. Frings M. (1997). The mind of Max Scheler. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.
  19. Garfinkel H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  20. Hély M. (2009). Les metamorphose du monde associatif. Paris: PUF.
  21. Hély M., Moulévrier P. (2013). L’économie sociale et solidaire: de l’utopie aux pratiques. Paris: La Dispute.
  22. Husserl E. (1987 [1931]). Cartesianische Meditationen. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
  23. Latour B. (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
  24. Laville J.L. (2009). Politique de l’association. Paris: Seuil.
  25. Lemieux C. (2009). Le Devoir et la Grace. Paris: Economia.
  26. Scheler M. (1980[1926]). Problem einer Soziologie des Wissens. Die Wissensformen und die Gesellschaft. Gesammelete Werke Band 8. Bern: Francke Verlage: 14-190 (English translation Frings M. 1980, Problem of a sociology of knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).
  27. Scheler M. (1982[1919]). Christlicher Sozialismus als Antikapitalismus. Politisch-Pädagogische Schriften. Gesammelte Werke, Band 4. Bern: Francke Verlage: 615-675.
  28. Scheler M. ([1911] 1986). Vorbilder und Führer. Schriften aus dem Nachlaß. Zur Ethik und Erkenntnislehre. Gesammelte Werke, Band 10. Bonn: Bouvier Verlag: 255-376.
  29. Schütz A. (1962). Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality. La Haye: Martinus Nijhoff.
  30. Silber I.F. (2003). Pragmatic Sociology as Cultural Sociology: Beyond Repertoire Theory?. European Journal of Social Theory, 6 (4): 427-449.
  31. Vaisey S. (2009). Motivation and Justification: A Dual‐Process Model of Culture in Action. American Journal of Sociology, 114 (6): 1675-1715.
  32. Vandenberghe F. (2008). Sociology of the Heart. Max Scheler’s Epistemology of love. Theory, Culture & Society. 25 (3): 17-51.
  33. Weber M. (1980 [1922]). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. Johannes Winckelmann: Tübingen.

Bruno Frère, Extrapolation! Phenomenology, sociology of critique and states of mind in the solidarity economy in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 158/2020, pp 21-47, DOI: 10.3280/SL2020-158002