Young people and entrepreneurship: the pluralism of strategies and push factors and the role of policies

Author/s Maria Dodaro
Publishing Year 2020 Issue 2020/158
Language Italian Pages 20 P. 264-283 File size 268 KB
DOI 10.3280/SL2020-158013
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The article focuses on the experiences of young people beneficiaries of entrepre-neurship support measures of the municipality of Milan. It aims to examine how, and under what conditions, different motivations and push factors at the basis of the entrepreneurial choice may combine. Based on the results of qualitative re-search using semi-structured interviews with young people and policy actors, this study shows the pluralism of motivations and factors informing the strategies of the young people interviewed, while highlighting the relevance of urban policies and social, economic and institutional conditions in which this pluralism takes shape.

Keywords: Young people, entrepreneurship, push factors, urban policies

  1. Ahmad N., Seymour R.G. (2008). Defining Entrepreneurial Activity: Definitions Supporting Frameworks for Data Collection. OECD Statistics Working Paper Series. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/24316468676
  2. Aldrich H.E. (2005). Entrepreneurship. In: Smelser R., Neil J. e Swedberg R., a cura di, The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  3. Appadurai A. (2004). The Capacity to Aspire: Culture and the Terms of Recognition. In: Rao M. e Walton V., a cura di, Culture and Public Action:Culture and Public Action. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  4. Arum R., Müller W. (2004). The reemergence of self-employment: a comparative study of self-employment dynamics and social inequality. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  5. Bagnasco A. (2006). Imprenditorialità e capitale sociale: il tema dello sviluppo locale. Stato e mercato, 3(78): 403-425. DOI: 10.1425/2323
  6. Bagnasco A., a cura di (2008). Ceto medio. Come e perché occuparsene. Bologna: il Mulino.
  7. Barbieri P., Bison I. (2004). Self-Employment in Italy: Scaling the Class Barriers. In: Arum W. e Müller R., a cura di, The reemergence of self-employment: a comparative study of self-employment dynamics and social inequalities. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
  8. Becattini G. (2002). From Marshall’s to the Italian “Industrial Districts”. A Brief Critical Reconstruction. In: Curzio A.Q. e Fortis M., a cura di, Complexity and Industrial Clusters. Contributions to Economics. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag HD.
  9. Beck U., Beck-Gernsheim E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences. London: Sage.
  10. Bosma N., Sternberg R. (2014). Entrepreneurship as an Urban Event? Empirical Evidence from European Cities. Regional Studies, 48(6): 1016-1033. DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2014.90404
  11. Camera di Commercio di Milano (2015). Milano Produttiva 2015. -- Disponibile al sito: [data di consultazione: 4/06/2020].
  12. Castel R. (2000). The Roads to Disaffiliation: Insecure Work and Vulnerable Relationships. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 24(3): 519-535. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.0026
  13. Commissione Europea (2016). The State of European Cities 2016. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2776/77006
  14. De Luigi N., Rizza R. (2011). La vulnerabilità dei giovani nel mercato del lavoro italiano: dinamiche e persistenze. Sociologia del lavoro, 124: 117-147. DOI: 10.3280/SL2011-12400
  15. Essers C., Dey P., Tedmanson D. e Verduyn K. (2017). Critical Perspectives on Entrepreneurship. Challenging Dominant Discourses. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
  16. Eurocities (2013). Cities supporting inclusive entrepreneurship. -- Disponibile al sito: [data di consultazione: 4/06/2020].
  17. Eurostat (2018). Self-employment by sex, age and economic activity. -- Disponibile al sito: [data di consultazione: 9/10/2019].
  18. Fumagalli A. (2015). Le trasformazioni del lavoro autonomo tra crisi e precarietà: il lavoro autonomo di III generazione. Quaderni di ricerca sull’artigianato, 2: 225-254. DOI: 10.12830/8114
  19. GEM (2004). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Rapporto Nazionale Italia 2003-2004. -- Disponibile al sito: [data di consultazione: 4/05/2020].
  20. GEM (2014). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Italia 2014. -- Disponibile al sito: [data di consultazione: 4/05/2020].
  21. GEM (2018). Global Report 2017-18. -- Disponibile al sito: [data di consultazione: 4/05/2020].
  22. Lodigiani R., Scippa E. (2014). Il self-employment tra politiche del lavoro e occupazionali, nella prospettiva europea dell’attivazione. In: Varesi A. e Vergani P.A., a cura di, Self-employment e sostegno pubblico all’imprenditorialità. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  23. Manzo C., Pais I. (2017). I fondatori di startup in Italia tra agency e struttura. Quaderni di sociologia, 73: 9-28.
  24. Murgia A., Maestripieri L. e Armano E. (2016). The precariousness of knowledge workers: hybridisation, self-employment and subjectification. Work Organisation, Labour & Globalisation, 10(2): 1-9.
  25. OCSE, Commissione Europea (2017). The Missing Entrepreneurs 2017. Policies for inclusive entrepreneurship. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  26. Panichella N. (2013). Per scelta o per costrizione? La decisione di mettersi in proprio in tempo di crisi. Sociologia del lavoro, 131: 104-119. DOI: 10.3280/SL2013-13100
  27. Ranci C. (2012). Partite Iva. Il lavoro autonomo nella crisi italiana. Bologna: il Mulino.
  28. Reynolds P., Niels B., Autio E., Hunt S., De Bono N., Servais I., Lopez-Garcia P. e Chin N. (2005). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Data Collection Design and Implementation 1998-2003. Small Business Economics, 24: 205-231.
  29. Ricucci R., Martino S., Bertolini S., Meo A. e Moiso V. (2018). Youth employment policies in Italy. EXCEPT Working Papers, No. 49. Tallin: Tallin University.
  30. Romano O. (2017). Il luddista metafisico. Quaderni di sociologia, 73: 67-79.
  31. Sheehan M., Mc Namara A. (2015). Business Start-Ups & Youth Self- Employment. A Policy Literature Review Synthesis Report. STYLE Working Papers. Brighton: University of Brighton.
  32. Spanò A. (2019). Giovani e lavoro: cambiamenti dei significati del lavoro in tempo di crisi. Sociologia del lavoro, 154: 203-222. DOI: 10.3280/SL2019-15401
  33. Swedberg R. (2000). The Social Science View of Entrepreneurship: Introduction and Practical Applications. In: Swedberg R., a cura di, Entrepreneurship: The Social Science View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  34. Walther A. (2005). Risks and Responsibilities? The Individualisation of Youth Transitions and the Ambivalence between Participation and Activation in Europe. Social Work & Society, 3(1): 116-127.
  35. Woodman D. (2013). Researching 'ordinary’ young people in a changing world: The sociology of generations and the ’missing middle’in youth research. Sociological Research Online, 18(1): 1-12.

Maria Dodaro, Giovani e imprenditorialità: il pluralismo delle strategie e dei fattori di spinta e il ruolo delle politiche in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 158/2020, pp 264-283, DOI: 10.3280/SL2020-158013