Educators, social workers, psychologists and teachers: A tool for self-assessment of students’ professional representations

Author/s Paola Ricchiardi, Emanuela M. Torre, Lara Colombo, Marilena Dellavalle, Chiara Ghislieri, Paola Torrioni
Publishing Year 2021 Issue 2021/1 Language Italian
Pages 16 P. 49-64 File size 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/erpoa1-2021oa11510
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The socio-psycho-educational professions present distinct professional curricula in Italy, due to the need to train professionals with a differentiated profile of skills. However, the social, educational and psychological work are often considered similar by students who are orienting themselves, for of an alleged common denominator, connected above all to the ethical aspects of the profession and to the recipients of the “educational or care actions” (eg children, frail subjects). It is not uncommon to find misconceptions andincorrect representations not only in the orientation phase, but also in students who have already arrived more than half of their studies, with the risk of generating drop out, transition to other courses or unsatisfied longterm professional disruption. It is therefore important to accompany students adequately to choose the professional field that best suits their propensities and attitudes, through the use of specific self-assessment tools. For this purpose, a self-assessment scale has been worked out for the socio-psychopedagogical professions. The tool was administered to the second/third year students of the study courses involved (educational sciences, psychological sciences, social service and teacher education), to identify the most frequent misconceptions, to inspire future interventions for the secondary schools.

Keywords: vocational guidance, educational work, social work, psychological work, self-assessment, misconceptions

  1. AIEJI. International Association of Social Educators (2005). The professional competence of social educators. A conceptual framework. -- (ver. 15.07.2020).
  2. Allegri, E. (2011). (S)parlano di noi. Lavoro sociale, 3, pp. 245-256.
  3. Atli, A. (2017). High School Students’ Gender Role Perceptions Regarding Various Professions. International Journal of Progressive Education, 3, pp. 6-15.
  4. Beijaard, D. (2019). Teacher learning as identity learning: models, practices, and topics. Teachers and Teaching. Theory and practice, 1, pp. 1-6.
  5. Buccolo, M. (2019). Ricerca e strategie di azione per il riconoscimento delle professioni educative e formative. Lifelong, Lifewide Learning, 15(34), pp. 9-22. DOI: 10.19241/lll.v15i34.255 (ver. 15.07.2020)
  6. Cambi, F., Catarsi, E., Colicchi, E., Fratini, C., & Muzi, M. (2006). Le professionalità educative. Roma: Carocci.
  7. Caprara, G. V., Dazzi, N., & Roncato, S. (1989). Guida alla laurea in psicologia. Bologna: il Mulino.
  8. Castro-Atwater, S. A., & Huynh Honbaum, A-L. (2015). A conceptual framework of “top 5 ethical” lessons for the helping professions. Education, 3, pp. 271-278.
  9. Cotter, E., & Fouad, N. A. (2011). The Relationship between Subjective Well-Being and Vocational Personality Type. Journal of Career Assessment, 1, pp. 51-60.
  10. D’Amico, A., Geraci, A., & Tarantino, C. (2020). The Relationship between Perceived Emotional Intelligence, Work Engagement, Job Satisfaction, and Burnout in Italian School Teachers: An Exploratory Study. Psychological Topics, 29(1), pp. 63-84. DOI: 10.31820/pt.29.1.4
  11. Drudy, S., Gunnerson, L., & Gilpin, A. (2009). Reference points for the design and delivery of degree programmes in education. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto. -- (ver. 15.07.2020).
  12. Facchini, C., (a cura di) (2010). Tra impegno e professione- Gli assistenti sociali come soggetti del welfare. Bologna: il Mulino.
  13. Federighi, P. (2018). I contenuti core dell’offerta formativa dei Corsi di laurea in Scienze dell’educazione e della formazione. Form@re - Open Journal per la Formazione in Rete, 18(3), pp. 19-36. DOI: 10.13128/formare-24609 (ver. 15.07.2020)
  14. Ferreira, A. I., Rodrigues, R. I. & da Costa Ferreira, P. (2016). Career Interests of Students in Psychology Specialties Degrees: Psychometric Evidence and Correlations with the RIASEC Dimensions. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 1, pp. 91-111.
  15. Germeijs, V., Luyckx, K., Notelaers, G., Goossens, L., & Verschueren, K. (2012). Choosing a Major in Higher Education: Profiles of Students’ Decision-Making Process. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3, pp. 229-239.
  16. Ghislieri, C. (2017). Verso la professione psicologica, tra confini incerti e trasformazioni possibili. Giornale italiano di psicologia, 44(3), pp. 639-644.
  17. Guichard, J., & Huteau, M. (2003). Psicologia dell’orientamento professionale. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.
  18. Han, M., Lee, S. E, & Lee, P. A. (2012). Burnout among entering MSW students: exploring the role of personal attributes. Journal of Social Work Education, 48(3), pp. 439-457.
  19. Ianes, D., Cramerotti, S., Biancato, L., & Demo, H. (2019). Il manuale dell’Expert Teacher. Trento: Erickson.
  20. Iori, V. (a cura di) (2018). Educatori e Pedagogisti. Senso dell’agire educativo e riconoscimento professionale. Trento: Erickson.
  21. Jamienson, D. (2011). Does TV accurately portray psychology? -- Retrived from (2/8/2020).
  22. Legge 27 dicembre 2017, n. 205. Bilancio di previsione dello Stato per l’anno finanziario 2018 e bilancio pluriennale per il triennio 2018-2020.
  23. Manzano-García, G., & Ayala-Calvo, J.-C. (2013). New Perspectives: Towards an Integration of the concept “burnout” and its explanatory models. Anales de psicología, 29(3), pp. 800-809. DOI: 10.6018/analesps.29.3.145241 (ver. 20.08.2020)
  24. Myyry, L. (2008). The Diversity of Value Meanings among University Students. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 6, pp. 549-564.
  25. Neukrug, E., Sparkman, N., & Moe, J. (2017). The Holland code of members of the national organization for human services: a preliminary study of human services professionals. Journal of employment counseling, 34, pp. 146-155.
  26. Nota, L., Mann, L., Soresi, S., & Friedman, I. A. (2002). Scelte e decisioni scolastico-professionali. Processi e procedure di analisi e intervento. Firenze: Giunti O.S.
  27. Orefice, P., Carullo, A., & Calaprice, S. (a cura di) (2011). Le professioni educative e formative: dalla domanda sociale alla risposta legislativa. Padova: Cedam.
  28. Perrenoud, Ph. (2002). Dieci nuove competenze per insegnare. Invito al viaggio. Roma: Anicia.
  29. Schreiber, M., Gschwend, A., & Iller, M.-L. S. (2020). The Vocational ID. Connecting Life Design Counselling and Personality Systems Interaction Theory. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 1, pp. 52-65.
  30. Schultz, H. T. (2005). Hollywood’s Portrayal of Psychologists and Psychiatrists: Gender and Professional Training Differences. In Cole, E. & Daniel, J. H. (a cura di), Psychology of women book series. Featuring females: Feminist analyses of media (pp. 101-112). Washington: American Psychological Association.
  31. Tognetti Bordogna, M. (a cura di) (2015). Formazione e occupazione dei laureati in Servizio sociale in tempi di crisi e discontinuità. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  32. Tramma, S. (2008). L’educatore imperfetto. Senso e complessità del lavoro educativo. Roma: Carocci.
  33. Yuksel-Sahin, F., & Hotaman, D. (2009). Vocational Guidance Aid in the Orientation to Teaching Profession and Teacher Education. European Journal of Social Sciences, 1, pp. 25-35.

Paola Ricchiardi, Emanuela M. Torre, Lara Colombo, Marilena Dellavalle, Chiara Ghislieri, Paola Torrioni, Educatori, assistenti sociali, psicologi e insegnanti: uno strumento per l’autovalutazione delle rappresentazioni professionali degli studenti in "EDUCATIONAL REFLECTIVE PRACTICES" 1/2021, pp 49-64, DOI: 10.3280/erpoa1-2021oa11510