The development of a european defence and its relations with NATO

Author/s Jean-Emmanuel Perrin
Publishing Year 2022 Issue 2022/1 Language English
Pages 26 P. 49-74 File size 210 KB
DOI 10.3280/DC2022-001003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

European Defence projects have coexisted in the same geopolitical space. While the latter carries with it the preservation of the transatlantic link between nations of the old and the new world, and guarantees the principle of solidarity in the event of aggression of one of its members, the first one defines itself as a "global" organization capable of dealing not only with defence issues, but also and above all, of bringing together in its organization countries sharing the same European space around economic prosperity. Are these two institutions nevertheless today competitors or partners of the European defence project? This is what this article attempts to answer.

Keywords: NATO, EU, defense, EUMC, EUMS, CSDP, armament, European security, cooperation.

  1. Anglade P.A., Pueyo J., Information report presented by the Foreign Affairs Commission of the French National Assembly on the European Defence and its articulation with NATO, registered 22 February 2018.
  2. Armand C., L’ambiguïté des relations OTAN-PESD: faux débat ou enjeu réel?, en Revue Internationale et stratégique, 2002/4, n° 48, pp. 129-137.
  3. Directive 2009/81/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the coordination of procedures for the award of certain works contracts, supply contracts and service contracts by contracting authorities or entities in the fields of defence and security, and amending Directives 2004/17/EC and 2004/18/EC.
  4. Directive 2009/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 simplifying terms and conditions of transfers of defence-related products within the Community.
  5. Dumas F., Straumann É., Information report presented by the Foreign Affairs Commission of the French National Assembly on stakes of the European armament industry, registered 12 February 2019. European External Action Service, EUMS Hosts Senior Military Staff talks with NATO, 19 May 2020.
  6. Hunter R.E., The European Security and Defence Policy: NATO’s Companion – or Competitor? - RAND Corporation Stable.--
  7. Joint declaration by the president of the European council, the president of the European commission, and the Secretary General of the North Atlantic treaty organization, 8 July 2016.
  8. Joint Franco-German declaration adopted during the Franco-German Council of Ministers, 19 June 2018, Meseberg, Germany.
  9. Le Gleut R. et Conway-Mouret Hélène, sénateurs, information report of the foreign affairs, Defence and armed forces commission of the French Senate on Which Strategic Compass for the European Union?, registered 7 July 2021.
  10. NATO review, Web edition, Vol. 39, No. 6, Déc. 1991, pp. 3-8.
  11. Petersberg Declaration, 19 June 1992, Conclusions of European Council Presidency, 14-15 December 2001.
  12. Pflimlin E., OTAN et PESD: concurrentes ou complémentaires?, in Le Monde, 2 avril 2009.

  • The Cooperation Between EU and NATO in Response to Hybrid Threats. A Retrospective Analysis from the Institutionalist Perspective Ondřej Filipec, in Slovak Journal of Political Sciences /2023 pp.27
    DOI: 10.34135/sjps.230102
  • European Union, transnational terrorism and the strategic choice of counterterrorism policies in democratic countries Mario Gilli, Paolo Tedeschi, in European Union Politics /2022 pp.612
    DOI: 10.1177/14651165221120370

Jean-Emmanuel Perrin, The development of a european defence and its relations with NATO in "DIRITTO COSTITUZIONALE" 1/2022, pp 49-74, DOI: 10.3280/DC2022-001003