Beyond the Covid emergency. Visions and action perspectives

Journal title TERRITORIO
Author/s Vincenzo Todaro, Annalisa Giampino
Publishing Year 2022 Issue 2021/98
Language Italian Pages 4 P. 39-42 File size 112 KB
DOI 10.3280/TR2021-098006
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This section brings back to the system some of the most significant perspectives of theoretical reflection and related repercussions on the level of practice that have started in Italy in the last year, in an attempt to overcome some rhetoric on the return to normality that seems to permeate speeches, narratives and operational proposals for the post-pandemic. A composite framework of interventions for outlining future research agendas able to propose a different future project for cities and territories.

Keywords: Covid-19; urban and regional planning; action perspectives

  1. Stavrides S., 2020, «Reclaiming the City as Commons. Learning from Latin
  2. American Housing Movements». Built Environment, 46, 1: 139-153.
  3. Wade L., 2020, «An unequal blow». Science, 368, 6492: 700-703.
  4. Webster C., Yan Lai K., Kumari S., Sarkar C., 2020, «The nature of cities and the Covid-19 pandemic». Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 46: 27-31.
  5. Yi I., 2020, «Creating Crisis-Resistant Policies and Institutions Post-Covid-19: Learning from UNRISD Research». -- (accesso: 2021.04.12).
  6. Allam Z., Jones D.S., 2020, «Pandemic stricken cities on lockdown. Where are our planning and design professionals [now, then and into the future]? ». Land Use Policy, 97: 1-5.
  7. Alraouf A.A., 2021, «The new normal or the forgotten normal: contesting COVID-19 impact on contemporary architecture and urbanism». Archnet-IJAR, 15, 1: 874. DOI: 10.1108/ARCH-10-2020-0249
  8. Bifulco L., Centemeri L., 2020, «Citta, preparadness e salute». Working papers. Rivista online di Urban@it, 1: 2-6. -- (accesso: 2021.05.22). Brenner N., 2016, Implosions/explosions. Towards a study of planetary urbanization. Berlin: Jovis.
  9. Cellamare C., 2011, Progettualita dell’agire urbano. Processi e pratiche urbane. Roma: Carocci.
  10. Cole H.V.S., Anguelovski I., Baró F., García-Lamarca M., Kotsila P., Pérez del Pulgar C., Shokry G., Triguero-Mas M., 2020, «The COVID-19 pandemic: power and privilege, gentrification, and urban environmental justice in the global north». Cities & Health, 1-5. DOI: 10.1080/23748834.2020.1785176
  11. De La Barra X., 2000, «Fear of Epidemics: The Engine of Urban Planning». Planning Practice & Research, 15, 1-2: 7-16. DOI: 10.1080/713691875
  12. Ellin N., 1999, Postmodern urbanism. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
  13. Haleem A., Javaid M., Vaishya R., Deshmukh S.G., 2020, «Areas of academic research with the impact of COVID-19». The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 38: 1515-1539.
  14. Honey-Rosés J., Anguelovski I., Chireh V.K., Daher C., Konijnendijk van den Bosch C., Litt J. S., Mawani V., McCall M.K., Orellana A., Oscilowicz E., Sánchez U., Senbel M., Tan X., Villagomez E., Zapata O., Nieuwenhuijsen M.J., 2020, «The impact of COVID-19 on public space: an early review of the emerging questions–design, perceptions and inequities». Cities & Health, Special Issue: Covid-19: 1-17. DOI: 10.1080/23748834.2020.1780074
  15. Harvey D., 2020, «Anti-capitalist politics in the time of COVID-19». Jacobin, 20 March. -- (accesso: 2021.03.18).
  16. Horton R., 2020, «Offline: COVID-19 is not a pandemic». Lancet, 396, 10255: 941-950. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32000-6
  17. International Monetary Fund, 2021, World Economic Outlook Update. January 2021. -- (accesso: 2021.03.24).
  18. Jon I., 2020, «A manifesto for planning after the coronavirus: Towards planning of care». Planning Theory, 19, 3: 329-345. DOI: 10.1177/1473095220931272
  19. Latour B., 2020, La sfida di Gaia. Il nuovo regime climatico. Milano: Meltemi. Latour B., 2018, Tracciare la rotta. Come orientarsi in politica. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  20. Marson A., Tarpino A., a cura di, 2020, «Abitare il territorio al tempo del Covid / Living the territories in the time of Covid». Scienze del Territorio, special issue: 6-202. -- php/sdt/issue/view/511.
  21. Nevius J., 2020, «New York’s built environment was shaped by pandemics ». -- (accesso: 2021.03.24).
  22. Roy A., 2020, «The pandemic is a portal». Financial Times. -- (accesso: 2021.07.22).
  23. Saadat S., Rawtani D., Hussain C.M., 2020, «Environmental perspective of COVID-19». Science of The Total Environment, 728, 138870.
  24. Salama A.M., 2020, «Coronavirus questions that will not go away: interrogating urban and socio-spatial implications of COVID-19 measures». Emerald Open Research, 2, 14.
  25. Soja E. W., 2010, Seeking Spatial Justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  26. Singer M., Bulled N., Ostrach B., Mendenhall E., 2017, «Syndemics and the biosocial conception of health». Lancet, 389, 10072: 941-950. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30003-X

Vincenzo Todaro, Annalisa Giampino, Oltre l’emergenza Covid. Visioni e prospettive d’azione in "TERRITORIO" 98/2021, pp 39-42, DOI: 10.3280/TR2021-098006