Three new challenges for sociology of health: Exposome, sociomarker and polysocial risk score

Author/s Antonio Maturo
Publishing Year 2023 Issue 2022/2 Suppl. Language Italian
Pages 14 P. 63-76 File size 343 KB
DOI 10.3280/WE2022-002-S1006
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

With big data serving as the basis for predictive medicine, the quantification of health through digital devices and artificial intelligence has opened new avenues for health prevention and promotion. Concepts that are increasingly important for health policy: exposome, sociomarker, and polysocial risk scores are analyzed sociologically. On this basis, the sociology of health has elevated importance. In the context of big health data and artificial intelligence, sociology can play an essential role in governance and social justice.

Keywords: Exposome; Sociomarker; Polysocial risk score; Health sociology; Prediction; Social justice.

  1. Anderson C. (2008). The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. -- Testo disponibile al sito: (3/06/2022).
  2. Cevolini A. and Esposito E. (2020). From pool to profile: Social consequences of algorithmic prediction in insurance. Big Data & Society, 7(2): 1-11. DOI: 10.1177/2053951720939228
  3. Conley D. and Fletcher J. (2017). The Genome Factor: What the Social Genomics Revolution Reveals Books About Ourselves, Our History and the Future. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  4. Espeland W.N. and Stevens M.L. (2008). A Sociology of Quantification. European Journal of Sociology, 49(3): 401-436.
  5. Figueroa J.F., Frakt A.B. and Jha A. (2020). Addressing Social Determinants of Health: Time for a Polysocial Risk Score. Journal of American Medical Association, 323(16): 1553-1554.
  6. Fourcade M. and Healy K. (2013). Classification Situations: Life-chances in the Neoliberal Era. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 38(8): 559-572.
  7. Harari Y.N. (2020). The world after the Coronavirus. Financial Times, April 19.
  8. McGinnis M., Williams-Russo P. and Knickma J.R. (2002). The Case For More Active Policy Attention To Health Promotion. Health Affairs, 21(2).
  9. Maturo A. (2022). Polysocial Risk Scores and Behavior-Based Health Insurance: Promises and Perils. Tecnoscienza, 13: 106-115.
  10. Maturo A. (2015). Doing Things with Numbers: The Quantified Self and the Gamification of Health. Eä – Journal of Medical Humanities & Social Studies of Science and Technology, 7(1): 87-105.
  11. Maturo A. (2003). Il caso statunitense: dall'assicurazione sanitaria all’insicurezza sociale. In: Giarelli G., a cura di, Il malessere della medicina. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  12. Maturo A. and Moretti V. (2018). Digital Health and the Gamification of life: How Apps can Promote a Positive Medicalization. London/New York: Emerald.
  13. Maturo A. and Setiffi F. (2023). Wellness, Social Policy and Public Health: Bridging Human Flourishing with Equity. London/New YorkMcginnis: Emerald.
  14. Morozov E. (2013). To Save Everything, Click Here: Technology, Solutionism, and the Urge To Fix Problems That Don’t Exist. London: Penguin.
  15. Neresini F. (2015). Quando i numeri diventano grandi: che cosa possiamo imparare dalla scienza. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 56(3-4): 405-431.
  16. Obermeyer Z., Powers B., Vogeli C. and Mullainathan S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464): 447-453.
  17. Rowe R. (2021). Social determinants of health in the Big Data mode of population health risk calculation. Big Data & Society, 8(2): 1-12. DOI: 10.1177/20539517211062881
  18. Russo P. and Knickman J. (2002). The Case For More Active Policy Attention To Health Promotion. Health affairs, 21(2):78-93.
  19. Senier L., Brown P., Shostak S. and Hanna B. (2016). The Socio-Exposome: Advancing Exposure Science and Environmental Justice in a Post-Genomic Era. Environ Sociol, 3(2): 107-121. DOI: 10.1080/23251042.2016.1220848
  20. Shin E.K., Mahajan R., Akbilgic O. et al. (2018). Sociomarkers and biomarkers: predictive modeling in identifying pediatric asthma patients at risk of hospital revisits. npj Digital Med, 1(50).
  21. Topol E. (2019). Deep medicine. How Artificial Intelligence can make medicine human again. New York: Basic Books.
  22. Wild C.P. (2005). Complementing the genome with an “exposome”: the outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention, 14(8): 1847-1850. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0456

Antonio Maturo, Tre nuove sfide per la sociologia della salute: esposoma, sociomarker e polysocial risk score in "WELFARE E ERGONOMIA" 2 Suppl./2022, pp 63-76, DOI: 10.3280/WE2022-002-S1006