Benessere psicologico ed oltre: Professionals’ Perspective on Proximity Psychology in the Ligurian Territory

Journal title RIVISTA SPERIMENTALE DI FRENIATRIA
Author/s Mara Donatella Fiaschi, Vittoria Romoli, Laura Migliorini
Publishing Year 2024 Issue 2024/1 Language Italian
Pages 16 P. 41-56 File size 658 KB
DOI 10.3280/RSF2024-001005
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The project “Benessere Psicologico e oltre” was a local psychological counseling initiative lasting eight months from May 2021 to January 2022 in the Liguria region. It was an innovative project in the field of health prevention and protection, starting with the unconventional coun- seling setting: consumer association network offices, traditionally located in the social fabric. The sample consisted of 75% women, with an average age of 41. Reported issues included anxiety management, general well-being, trau- ma, and physical problems. The analysis of supervisions and interviews with psychologists revealed strengths and challenges in project implementation. Supervision among psychologists facilitated collaboration, contributing to a shared intervention model. Brief counseling proved effective for various is- sues, promoting self-care processes, and aligning needs and resources. The project aimed to prevent and promote psychological health, involving local services in an interconnected social network to guide users’ psychological health, toward informed choices, addressing logistical and organizational challenges.

Keywords: Proximity Health, Pilot Project, Community Psychology.

  1. Minozzi S, Saulle R, Amato L, Davoli M. Impatto del distanziamento sociale percovid-19 sul benessere psicologico dei giovani: una revisione sistematica della letteratura. Recenti Progressi in Medicina 2021;112: 360-370.
  2. Orford J. Verso una teoria generale per la psicologia di comunità. Re- quisiti per una teoria generale. In: Arcidiacono C, Gelli B R, Putton A, ed. Empowerment sociale. Milano: FrancoAngeli, 1996. p. 151-160.
  3. Corrigan P W. Community-based participatory research (CBPR), stig- ma, and health. based participatory research (CBPR), stigma, and heal- th. Stigma and Health 2020; 5.2: 123.
  4. Bessone M, Sarasso P. Il setting clinico come determinante sociale del- la salute mentale e strumento di produzione o contrasto di disugua- glianze sociali. Comunita Imperfette 2019; 133.
  5. Alderwick H. Priorities for the new health secretary. Bmj 2021; 374.
  6. Costa G. L’equità nella salute in Italia: secondo rapporto sulle disugua- glianze sociali in sanità. L’equità nella salute in Italia 2014; 0-0.
  7. Cardamone G, Zorzetto S, Da Prato M. Il virus, la distanza sociale e l’istanza relazionale: sfide e prospettive per la Salute mentale di comu- nità. 2020; 123-142.
  8. Bongiovanni L. Il welfare generativo di prossimità: solo buon esempio o prassi da modellare? Una riflessione a partire dai dati di esperienza. Welfare oggi 2017; 17.5: 25-32.
  9. Giusti E, Benedetti M. Il counseling di comunità: la rete psicologica del benessere sociale. Sovera Edizioni 2011.
  10. Bologna M, Fiaschi M D. La seduta singola nella prospettiva della resi- lienza. Psichiatria di Comunità 2011; 10: 1-14.
  11. Bologna M, Fiaschi M D, Gislon M C. L’intervento A Seduta Singola. Mimesis, 2023.
  12. Falender C A, Shafranske E P. Casebook for clinical supervision: A competency-based approach. American Psychological Association 2008.American Psychological Association 2008.
  13. Falender C A, Shafranske E P. Clinical supervision: The state of the art. Journal of Psychology 2014; 70.11: 1030-1041.
  14. Charmaz K, Belgrave L L. Thinking about data with grounded theory. Qualitative inquiry 2019; 25.8: 743-753.
  15. Corbin J, Strauss A. Qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory 2008; 3.
  16. Dey I. Grounded theory. In Seale C, Gobo G, Gubrium J F, Silverman D, ed. Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage; 2004. p 80-93.
  17. Cosgrove L, Herrawi F. Beware of equating increased access to mental health services with health equity: The need for clinical and epistemic humility in psychology. The Humanistic Psychologist 2021.
  18. Migliorini L, De Piccoli N, Cardinali P, Rollero C, Marzana D, Arci- diacono C, Guidi E, Esposito C, Novara C, Fedi A, Marta E, Guazzini A, Meringolo P, Monaci M G, Agueli B, Procentese F, Di Napoli I. Contextual influences on Italian university students during the CO- VID-19 lockdown: Emotional responses, coping strategies and resilien- ce. Community Psychology in Global Perspective, 2021, 7.1: 71-87.
  19. Hunter D J, Perkins N. Partnership working in public health. Bristol: Policy Press; 2014.

Mara Donatella Fiaschi, Vittoria Romoli, Laura Migliorini, Benessere psicologico ed oltre: il punto di vista dei professionisti sulla Psicologia di prossimità nel territorio ligure in "RIVISTA SPERIMENTALE DI FRENIATRIA" 1/2024, pp 41-56, DOI: 10.3280/RSF2024-001005