ReLambro se. A project for the enhancement of natural capital

Journal title TERRITORIO
Author/s Andrea Arcidiacono, Antonio Longo, Daniela Masotti
Publishing Year 2025 Issue 2023/107
Language Italian Pages 7 P. 27-33 File size 530 KB
DOI 10.3280/TR2023-107003
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

The following article reflects on the ReLambro se project by presenting two complementary aspects of the project. On the one hand, it highlights the relationships between the project and previous research funded in recent years by Fondazione Cariplo, starting from the boosting of the synergy of the ReLambro and Volare research, which made it possible to build a wealth of knowledge and consolidate a broad network of public and private actors. On the other hand, it returns the territorial relevance of the project which started from the need to define a strategic vision of the ecosystem and landscape context of the Lambro as a spatial design and multifunctional environmental network for the coherence of pilot projects aimed at enhancing the natural capital of the area.

Keywords: peri-urban open spaces; multiscale; biodiversity

  1. Ahern J., Cilliers S.S., Niemelä J., 2014, «The Concept of Ecosystem Services in Adaptive Urban Planning and Design: A Framework for Supporting Innovation». Landscape and Urban Planning, 125: 254-259.
  2. Albert C., Aronson J., Fu¨rst C., Opdam P., 2014, «Integrating Ecosystem Services in Landscape Planning: Requirements, Approaches, and Impacts». Landscape Ecology, 29, 8: 1277-1285.
  3. Antrop M., 1998, «Landscape Change: Plan or Chaos?». Landscape and Urban Planning, 41: 155-161. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00068-1
  4. Arcidiacono A., Ronchi S., 2020, eds., Ecosystem Services and Green Infrastructure: Perspectives from Spatial Planning in Italy. Cham: Springer. Arcidiacono A., Salata S., Ronchi S., 2018, «Un approccio ecosistemico al progetto delle infrastrutture verdi nella pianificazione
  5. Balzan M.V., Zulian G., Maes J., Borg M., 2021, «Assessing Urban Ecosystem Services to Prioritise Nature-Based Solutions in a High-Density Urban Area». Nature-Based Solutions, 1: 100007. DOI: 10.1016/J.NBSJ.2021.100007
  6. Berger A., 2007, Drosscape. Princeton: Architectural Press.
  7. Bonfantini B., 2021, «Interstice Spaces as Urban Synapses, Rewritings and Over-Writings». In: Bonfantini B., Forino I. (eds.), Urban Interstices in Italy. Design Experiences. Siracusa: LetteraVentidue, 23-32.
  8. Clément G., 2004, Manifeste du Tiers paysage. Montreuil: Editions Sujet/ Object (trad. it., 2005, Manifesto del terzo paesaggio. Macerata: Quodlibet). Donadieu P., 1998, Campagnes urbaines. Versailles: Actes Sud, Ecole nationale supérieure du paysage (trad. it., 2006, Campagne urbane.
  9. Una nuova proposta di paesaggio della città. Roma: Donzelli). European Commission, 2013, Building a Green Infrastructure for Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  10. European Commission, 2015, Towards an eu Research and Innovation Policy Agenda for Nature-Based Solutions & Re-Naturing Cities. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  11. Ferrari C., Pezzi G., 2013, L’ecologia del paesaggio. Bologna: il Mulino. Gomez-Baggethun E., Barton D.N., 2013, «Classifying and Valuing Ecosy-stem Services for Urban Planning». Ecological Economics, 86: 235-245.
  12. Grêt-regamey A., Altwegg J., Sirén E.A., van Strien M.J., Weibel B., 2017, «Integrating Ecosystem Services into Spatial Planning. A Spatial Decision Support Tool». Landscape and Urban Planning, 165: 206-219.
  13. Haase D., Frantzeskaki N., Elmqvist T., 2014, «Ecosystem Services in Urban Landscapes: Practical Applications and Governance Implications», Ambio, 43, 4: 407-412.
  14. Lapintie K., Di Marino M., 2019, «Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services and Environmental Planning». In: Davoudi S., Cowell R., White I., Blanco H. (eds.), Routledge Companion to Environmental Planning. London-New York: Routledge, 268-276.
  15. Longato D., Cortinovis C., Balzan M., Geneletti D., 2023, «A Method to Prioritize and Allocate Nature-Based Solutions in Urban Areas Based on Ecosystem Service Demand». Landscape and Urban Planning, 235: 104743.
  16. Longo A., 2023, «Milano e il Lambro: il fiume in città e la possibile gestione di un progetto di spazi aperti», Territorio, 101: 89-92. DOI: 10.3280/TR2022-101010
  17. Longo A., Giacomel A., Masotti D., 2016, a cura di, Re Lambro: il fiume nuova infrastruttura ecologica della metropoli milanese. Milano: ersaf. Maes J., Lopes Barbosa A., Baranzelli C., Zulian G., Batista E Silva F., Vandecasteele I., Hiederer R., Liquete Garcia M., Paracchini M., Mubareka S., Jacobs C., Perpiña Castillo C., Lavalle C., 2014, «More Green Infrastructure is Required to Maintain Ecosystem Services Under Current Trends in Land-Use Change in Europe». Landscape Ecology, 30: 517-534.
  18. Magnaghi A., 1995, a cura di, «Bonifica, riconversione e valorizzazione ambientale del bacino dei fiumi Lambro, Seveso e Olona. Linee orientative per un progetto integrato». Quaderni Urbanistica, 2 (monografico). Pasqui G., 2018, Raccontare Milano. Politiche, progetti, immaginari. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  19. Santos-Martín F., Geneletti D., Burkhard B., 2019, «Mapping and Assessing Ecosystem Services: Methods and Practical Applications», One Ecosystem, 4: e35904.
  20. Tozzi L., 2022, L’invenzione di Milano. Napoli: Cronopio.

Andrea Arcidiacono, Antonio Longo, Daniela Masotti, ReLambro se. Un progetto di valorizzazione del capitale naturale in "TERRITORIO" 107/2023, pp 27-33, DOI: 10.3280/TR2023-107003