Parasocial Feminism and Social Media Communities: Subjective Empowerment and its Ambivalences

Titolo Rivista PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA'
Autori/Curatori Johanna Lisa Degen, Jacob Johanssen
Anno di pubblicazione 2026 Fascicolo 2025/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 27 P. 86-112 Dimensione file 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/psc2025oa21762
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Vedi l'articolo Scarica l'articolo open access

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Contemporary digital feminist activism is often embodied and represented through individual influencer accounts, which enable a form of parasocial feminism, likely being effective due to parasocial mechanisms and their significance for the social self. This study explores the influence and meaning of parasocial feminism for followers. To this end, 46 narratives by social media followers of an influencer who is a German artist and practices a distinct form of parasocial feminism known as #volanismus (“#volanism”), addressing misogyny, inequality and suppression through drawings and performance art in the form of online responses to hateful social media comments. Applying a psychoanalytic paradigm, we investigate how content and parasocial community dynamics are subjectively experienced through explicit and latent layers of meaning. The findings reveal how parasocial feminism bears significant meaning on the subjective level for the self, but also in the form of practical relevance, shaping everyday life and social and relational dynamics (e.g., divorce, having another child, transforming sexual scripts). We discuss these findings in terms of resistance and group dynamics, with a particular focus on how social mechanisms are transformed under spreading parasociality, with social media communities becoming a key part of the social self and contemporary social organizing. We also highlight limitations, noting that online activism perpetuates an individualizing logic within contemporary liberal feminism and platform capitalism.

Parole chiave:social media;community psychology;feminism;online communities;parasocial relationships;parasociality;parasocial feminism

  1. Fetter, S., Coyne, P., Monk, S., & Woodruff, S. J. (2023). An exploration of social media users’ desires to become social media influencers. Media Watch, 14(2), 200-216.
  2. Abidin, C. (2016). “Aren’t these just young, rich women doing vain things online?”: Influencer selfies as subversive frivolity. Social media+ society, 2(2), 2056305116641342.
  3. Akhila, K. P., & John, J. (2024). Deliberate democracy and the MeToo movement: Examining the impact of social media feminist discourses in India. In: The Routledge International Handbook of Feminisms in Social Work (pp. 513-525). Routledge.
  4. Bayer, J. B., Anderson, I. A., & Tokunaga, R. S. (2022). Building and breaking social media habits. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, 101303.
  5. Bourdieu, P. (2018). Structures, habitus, practices. In Rethinking the subject (pp. 31-45). Routledge.
  6. Brinkmann, S. (2017). Humanism after posthumanism: Or qualitative psychology after the “posts”. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 14(2), 109-130.
  7. Cheng, C., Lau, Y., Chan, L., & Luk, J.W. (2021). Prevalence of Social Media Ad-diction across 32 Nations: Meta-Analysis with Subgroup Analysis of Classification Schemes and Cultural Values. Addictive Behaviors, 117, 106845. Doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106845.
  8. Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 118(9), e2023301118.
  9. Clarke, S. and Hoggett, P. (2009) Researching beneath the surface. Psycho-social research methods in practice. London: Karnac Books.
  10. Clark, M., & Lupton, D. (2023). The materialities and embodiments of mundane software: exploring how apps come to matter in everyday life. Online Information Review, 47(2), 398-413.
  11. Degen, J. L., & Kleeberg-Niepage, A. (2025). Coping with mobile-online-dating fatigue and the negative self-fulfilling prophecy of digital dating. SN Social Sciences, 5(2), 12.
  12. Degen, J.L. (2025). The Shaping of the Parasocial Self. On the Psychology of Relationships and Intimacy in the Digital Era. Palgrave.
  13. Degen, J. L., Pistoll, D., Brandmaier, A. M., & Bröning, S. (2025). Where you lead, I will follow: Developing a new measure for studying parasocial involvement with influencers. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 19(3).
  14. Degen, J.L. (2024). Swipe, like, love: Intimität und Beziehung im digitalen Zeitalter.
  15. Degen, J. L., Kleeberg-Niepage, A., & Bal, P. M. (2024). Lost in Context? Critical Perspectives on Individualization. Human Arenas, 7(3), 507-512.
  16. Degen, J. L. (2023a). “I feel like a sex ed wizard now”: Critical community psychology applied in digital education for teachers on the topic of sex education. International Review of Theoretical Psychology, 2(1). Doi: 10.7146/irtp.v2i1.142792.
  17. Degen, J. L. (2023b). Rationalizing fiction cues: Psychological effects of disclosing ads and the inaccuracy of the human mind when being in parasocial relationships. Informing Science, 26.
  18. Degen, J. L., & Simpson, S. (2022). Me, my product and I: Selling out on# Sustainability. In Nachhaltigkeit und Social Media: Bildung für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung in der digitalen Welt (pp. 143-164). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
  19. Farivar, S., Wang, F., & Turel, O. (2022). Followers’ problematic engagement with influencers on social media: An attachment theory perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 133, 107288.
  20. Galpin, C. (2022). At the digital margins? A theoretical examination of social media engagement using intersectional feminism. Politics and Governance, 10(1), 161-171. Doi: 10.17645/pag.v10i1.4801.
  21. Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. Oxford university press.
  22. Ging, D., & Siapera, Ε. (2018). Special Issue on Online Misogyny. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 515-524. Doi: 10.1080/14680777.2018.1447345.
  23. Hartmann, A., Kammholz, M., & Zengler, Y. (2024). Übe dich im Genuss! Soziale Passagen, 16(1), 181-197.
  24. Hasebrink, U., Hölig, S., & Wunderlich, L. (2021). #UseTheNews: Studie zur Nachrichtenkompetenz Jugendlicher und junger Erwachsener in der digitalen Medienwelt [#UseTheNews: A study on news literacy among adolescents and young adults in the digital media environment]. Hans‐Bredow‐Institut. Doi: 10.21241/ssoar.72822.
  25. Hollway, W. and Jefferson, T. (2012). Doing Qualitative Research Differently. Free Association, Narrative and the Interview Method. Second Edition. London: Sage.
  26. Hou, Y., Xiong, D., Jiang, T., Song, L., & Wang, Q. (2019). Social media addiction: Its impact, mediation, and intervention. Cyberpsychology: Journal of psychosocial research on cyberspace, 13(1).
  27. Interian, R., G. Marzo, R., Mendoza, I., & Ribeiro, C. C. (2023). Network polarization, filter bubbles, and echo chambers: an annotated review of measures and reduction methods. International Transactions in Operational Research, 30(6), 3122-3158.
  28. Jarman, H.K., Marques, M.D., McLean, S.A., Slater, A., & Paxton, S.J. (2021). Motivations for Social Media Use: Associations with Social Media Engagement and Body Satisfaction and Well-Being among Adolescents. J Youth Adolescence 50, 2279-2293. Doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01390-z.
  29. Johanssen, J. (2016). Did we fail? (Counter-) transference in a qualitative media research interview. Interactions: Studies in Communication and Culture, 7(1), 99-111. Doi: 10.1386/iscc.7.1.99_1.
  30. Johanssen, J. (2019). Psychoanalysis and Digital Culture: Audiences, Social Media, and Big Data. London: Routledge.
  31. Johanssen, J. (2022). Fantasy, Online Misogyny and the Manosphere: Male Bodies of Dis/Inhibition. London: Routledge.
  32. Johanssen, J. & Kay, J. B. (2024). From femcels to ‘femcelcore’: Women’s involuntary celibacy and the rise of heteronihilism. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 28(4), 981-999. Doi: 10.1177/13675494241293731.
  33. Jouët, J. (2018). Digital feminism: Questioning the renewal of activism. Journal of Research in Gender Studies, 8(1), 133‑157. Doi: 10.22381/JRGS8120187.
  34. Kay, J. B. (2024). The reactionary turn in popular feminism. Feminist Media Studies, 1-18. Doi. 10.1080/14680777.2024.2393187.
  35. Kessling, A., Schmidt, L.D., Brand, M., & Wegmann, E. (2023). Implicit Cognitions in Problematic Social Network Use. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 12(3), 590-598. Doi. 10.1556/2006.2023.00035.
  36. Keum, B. T., Wang, Y. W., Callaway, J., Abebe, I., Cruz, T., & O’Connor, S. (2023). Benefits and harms of social media use: A latent profile analysis of emerging adults. Current Psychology, 42(27), 23506-23518.
  37. Kleeberg-Niepage, A., & Degen, J. L. (2022). Between self-actualization and waste of time: young people’s evaluations of digital media time. In Children, Youth and Time (pp. 29-47). Emerald Publishing Limited.
  38. Leaver, T., Highfield, T. & Abidin, C. (2020). Instagram: Visual Social Media Cultures. Polity.
  39. Locke, A., Lawthom, R., & Lyons, A. (2018). Social media platforms as complex and contradictory spaces for feminisms: Visibility, opportunity, power, resistance and activism. Feminism & Psychology, 28(1), 3-10. Doi: 10.1177/0959353517753973.
  40. Maxwell, L. C., Tefertiller, A. C., & Neese, C. (2025). “It’s you and me, there’s nothing like this”: Parasocial relationships, fear of missing out, and how fans consume the products in Taylor Swift’s media empire. Psychology of Popular Media. Doi: 10.1037/ppm0000588.
  41. Marwick, A.E. & Caplan, R. (2018). Drinking Male Tears: Language, the Manosphere, and Networked Harassment. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 543-559. Doi. 10.1080/14680777.2018.1450568.
  42. Newlands, G., & Fieseler, C. (2020). #dreamjob: Navigating pathways to success as an aspiring Instagram influencer. In C. Goanta & S. Ranchordás (Eds.), The regulation of social media influencers (pp. 167-184). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  43. Paravati, E., Naidu, E., Gabriel, S., & Wiedemann, C. (2020). More than just a tweet: The unconscious impact of forming parasocial relationships through social media. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(4), 388.
  44. Park, Y.J., Chung, J.E., & Kim, J.N. (2022). Social Media, Misinformation, and Cultivation of Informational Mistrust: Cultivating Covid-19 Mistrust. Journalism, 23(12), 2571-2590. Doi. 10.1177/14648849221085050.
  45. Plesa, P. (2024). Neonihilism: Meaninglessness and irony in neoliberal capitalism. Theory & Psychology, 34(5), 611-629.
  46. Plesa, P. (2025). Subjectivity and Neonihilism: Constituting a Self in a Meaningless World. New York: Palgrave.
  47. Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2020). The social media party: Fear of missing out (FoMO), social media intensity, connection, and well-being. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 36(4), 386-392.
  48. Rodgers, R. F., Mclean, S. A., Gordon, C. S., Slater, A., Marques, M. D., Jarman, H. K., & Paxton, S. J. (2021). Development and validation of the motivations for social media use scale (MSMU) among adolescents. Adolescent Research Review, 6, 425-435.
  49. Saraswati, L. (2021). Pain Generation: Social Media, Feminist Activism, and the Neoliberal Selfie. New York, USA: New York University Press. Doi. 10.18574/nyu/9781479808342.001.0001.
  50. Scharff, C. (2023). Are we all influencers now? Feminist activists discuss the distinction between being an activist and an influencer. Feminist Theory, 25(3), 454-470. Doi. 10.1177/14647001231201062.
  51. Schraube, E. (2009). Technology as materialized action and its ambivalences. Theory & Psychology, 19(2), 296-312.
  52. Schraube, E. (2024). Digitalization and learning as a worlding practice: Why dialogue matters. Routledge.
  53. Scott, C. F., Bay-Cheng, L. Y., Prince, M. A., Nochajski, T. H., & Collins, R. L. (2017). Time spent online: Latent profile analyses of emerging adults’ social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 311-319.
  54. Shareef, M.A., Kapoor, K.K., Mukerji, B., Dwivedi, R., & Dwivedi, Y.K. (2020). Group Behavior in Social Media: Antecedents of Initial Trust Formation. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 106225. Doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.106225.
  55. Shaw, F. (2016). «Bitch I Said Hi»: The Bye Felipe Campaign and Discursive Activism in Mobile Dating Apps. Social Media + Society, 2(4). Doi. 10.1177/2056305116672889.
  56. Shea, A. L., Omapang, A. K., Cho, J. Y., Ginsparg, M. Y., Bazarova, N. N., Hui, W., ... & Margolin, D. B. (2025). Beyond ad hominem attacks: A typology of the discursive tactics used when objecting to news commentary on social media. PLoS One, 20(8), e0328550.
  57. Snyder, C. K. (2022). Navigating online misogyny: strategies, methods, and debates in digital feminism. Feminist Studies, 48(3), 776-789.
  58. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Political psychology (pp. 276-293). Psychology Press.
  59. Tandon, A., Dhir, A., Almugren, I., Alnemer, G.N., & Mäntymäki, M. (2021a). Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) among Social Media Users: A Systematic Literature Review, Synthesis and Framework for Future Research. Internet Research, 3, 782-821. Doi: 10.1108/INTR-11-2019-0455.
  60. Terren, L., & Borge-Bravo, R. (2021). Echo Chambers on Social Media: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Review of Communication Research, 9, 99-118.
  61. VanSlette, S. (2025). How the King of Beers lost its crown: Bud Light’s Dylan Mulvaney crisis. Case Studies in Strategic Communication, 9(1), 1-17.
  62. Velasco, J.C. (2020). You Are Cancelled: Virtual Collective Consciousness and the Emergence of Cancel Culture as Ideological Purging. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 12(5), 1-7. Doi: 10.21659/rupkatha.v12n5.rioc1s21n2.
  63. Vrontis, D., Makrides, A., Christofi, M., & Thrassou, A. (2021). Social Media Influencer Marketing: A Systematic Review, Integrative Framework and Future Research Agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), 617-644. Doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12647.
  64. Walls, K., Palvia, P., Mehta, N., & Nemati, H. (2025). Cancel Culture in the Digital Age: Power, Accountability, and Global Dynamics. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 1-6.
  65. Willem, C., & Tortajada, I. (2021). Gender, Voice and Online Space: Expressions of Feminism on Social Media in Spain. Media and Communication, 9(2), 62-71. Doi. 10.17645/mac.v9i2.3851.
  66. Zhang, R., Pruitt, S., & Chang Bi, N. (2024). This brand is #cancelled: Exploring brand avoidance in the age of cancel culture and influencer marketing. Journal of Digital & Social Media Marketing, 11(4), 349-361.
  67. Zuboff, S. (2022). Surveillance capitalism or democracy? The death match of in-stitutional orders and the politics of knowledge in our information civilization. Organization Theory, 3(3), 26317877221129290.

  • Ich followe, also bin ich Diana Pistoll, Sonja Bröning, Johanna L. Degen, in Beratung aktuell /2025 pp.11
    DOI: 10.30820/1437-3181-2025-2-11
  • Social Participation and Contemporary Scenarios: Transformations, Representations, and Psychosocial Impacts in Territories Fortuna Procentese, in PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA' 2/2026 pp.7
    DOI: 10.3280/psc2025oa21758

Johanna Lisa Degen, Jacob Johanssen, Parasocial Feminism and Social Media Communities: Subjective Empowerment and its Ambivalences in "PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA'" 2/2025, pp 86-112, DOI: 10.3280/psc2025oa21762