Sustainable Digital Transformation: SDG-Aligned Bibliometric Mapping

Titolo Rivista CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Autori/Curatori Tea Mijac, Mario Jadric, Maja Cukušic, Marco Savastano
Anno di pubblicazione 2026 Fascicolo 2025/2
Lingua Inglese Numero pagine 16 P. 37-52 Dimensione file 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/cgrds2-2025oa21122
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Although interest in the intersection of sustainability and digital transformation is growing, Sustainable Digital Transformation (SDT) remains under-defined and empirically thin. A comprehensive review of the SDT literature was done in this study to assess the extent of empirical research. Searches of Scopus and Web of Science were refined for relevance and complemented by bibliometric mapping and SDG alignment. Findings indicate a post-2018 publication surge, with six thematic clusters, and SDG attention concentrated on SDG 9 and SDG 13 (with links to SDG 11). Use of “sustainable” is often rhetorical, with few designs tracing outcomes to specific SDG targets. Results show that SDT research remains fragmented, and that clearer concepts, SDG-linked indicators, and designs demonstrating measurable SDG outcomes are needed to inform policy and practice.

Parole chiave:sustainable digital transformation;digitalisation;sustainability;SDG mapping

  1. Abdallah Y., Shehab E., Al-Ashaab A. (2022). Sustainable Digital Transformation: The Role of Organisational Digital Culture. Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, 25: 60-66. DOI: 10.3233/ATDE220566
  2. Bican P., Brem A. (2020). Digital Business Model, Digital Transformation, Digital Entrepreneurship: Is there a sustainable “digital”? Sustainability, 12(13): 1-15. DOI: 10.3390/su12135239
  3. Chen Y., Wang Z., Ortiz J. (2023). A Sustainable Digital Ecosystem: Digital Servitization Transformation and Digital Infrastructure Support. Sustainability, 15(2), 1530. DOI: 10.3390/su15021530
  4. Creswell J.W., Creswell J.D. (2018). Research design (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
  5. EC (2020). A New Industrial Strategy for a Green and Digital Europe. <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/european-industrial-strategy_en#accelerating-twin-transitions">https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/european-industrial-strategy_en#accelerating-twin-transitions</a>.
  6. Geyda A., Fedorchenko L., Lysenko I., Svistunova A., Khasanov D. (2021). Concepts and principles of the sustainable digital technologies use: process science and activity theory view. E3S Web of Conferences, 311. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202131107005
  7. Ginting M., Simbolon E.B., Wandasari N., Muda I. (2022). Establishing a Sustainable Digital Healthcare Company through Innovation and Digital Transformation Imperative in Indofarma Pharmaceutical Corporation. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, 13(7): 4149-4158. DOI: 10.47750/pnr.2022.13.S07.520
  8. Lamarre E., Smaje K., Zemmel R. (2023). Rewired: the McKinsey Guide to Out-competing in the Age of Digital and AI. Wiley & Sons.
  9. Lankhuizen M., Diodato D., Weterings A., Ivanova O., Thissen M. (2023). Identifying labour market bottlenecks in the energy transition: a combined IO-matching analysis. Economic Systems Research, 35(2): 157-182.
  10. Liao J. (2024). Enabling a Sustainable Digital Transformation. Journal of Latin American Sciences and Culture, 6(9): 33-43. DOI: 10.52428/27888991.v6i9.1192
  11. Linkov I., Trump B.D., Poinsatte-Jones K., Florin M. (2018). Governance strategies for a sustainable digital world. Sustainability, 10(2): 1-8. DOI: 10.3390/su10020440
  12. Manfreda A., Mijač T. (2024). Highlighting gaps in technology acceptance research: A call for integrating happiness and well-being into smart city development. Journal of Innovation and Knowledge, 9(4), 100585. DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2024.100585
  13. Montresor S., Vezzani A. (2023). Digital technologies and eco-innovation. Evidence of the twin transition from Italian firms. Industry and Innovation, 30(7): 766-800.
  14. Ninčević Pašalić I., Mijač T. (2023). Science Mapping the Research of Business Process Management: Patterns and Implications for Comparable Information Technology Fields. Journal of Contemporary Economics, 4(7): 26-44. DOI: 10.7251/joce2307026n
  15. Nurova O., Freze T. (2021). Competitive advantage of the sustainable digital economy. E3S Web of Conferences, 250. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202125006004
  16. Pūraitė A., Adamonienė R., Žemeckė A. (2020). Sustainable digitalization in public institutions: Challenges for human rights. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(3): 91-102. DOI: 10.14207/ejsd.2020.v9n3p91
  17. Rivest M., Kashnitsky Y., Bédard-Vallée A., Campbell D., Khayat P., Labrosse I., Pinheiro H., Provençal S., Roberge G., James C. (2021). Improving the Scopus and Aurora queries to identify research that supports the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2021. DOI: 10.17632/9sxdykm8s4.4
  18. Rosati P., Lynn T., Kreps D., Conboy K. (2024). Digital Sustainability: Key Definitions and Concepts. Palgrave Studies in Digital Business & Enabling Technologies, 1-24. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-61749-2_1
  19. Rupeika-Apoga R., Petrovska K. (2022). Barriers to Sustainable Digital Transformation in Micro-, Small-, and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Sustainability, 14(20), 13558. DOI: 10.3390/su142013558
  20. Savastano M., Zentner H., Spremić M., Cucari N. (2022a). Assessing the relation-ship between digital transformation and sustainable business excellence in a turbulent scenario. Total quality management & business excellence, 1-22. DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2022.2063717
  21. Savastano M., Cucari N., Dentale F. Ginsberg A. (2022b). The interplay between digital manufacturing and dynamic capabilities: an empirical examination of direct and indirect effects on firm performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 33(2): 213-238.
  22. Saraji M.K., Streimikiene D., Kyriakopoulos G.L. (2021). Fermatean fuzzy critic‐copras method for evaluating the challenges to industry 4.0 adoption for a sustainable digital transformation. Sustainability, 13(17). DOI: 10.3390/su 13179577
  23. Shang Z., Zhang L. (2022). The Sustainable Digitalization in the Manufacturing Industry: A Bibliometric Analysis and Research Trend. Mobile Information Systems, 2022(1), 1451705. DOI: 10.1155/2022/1451705
  24. Szabó R.Z., Szedmák B., Tajti A., Bera P. (2023). Environmental Sustainability, Digitalisation, and the Entrepreneurial Perception of Distances as Drivers of SMEs’ Internationalisation. Sustainability, 15(3), 2487. DOI: 10.3390/su 15032487
  25. Tricco A.C., Lillie E., Zarin W., O’Brien K.K., Colquhoun H., Levac D., et al. (2018). PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467-473. DOI: 10.7326/M18-0850
  26. United Nations (2023). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023: Special edition Towards a Rescue Plan for People and Planet. <a href="https://unstats.un.org/">https://unstats.un.org/</a> sdgs/report/2023/The-Sustainable-Development-Goals-Report-2023.pdf.
  27. Yacob P., Peter D. (2022). Perceived Benefits of Sustainable Digital Technologies Adoption in Manufacturing SMEs. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 19(04), 2250012. DOI: 10.1142/S0219877022500122
  28. Zamiri M., Ferreira J., Sassanelli C., Gusmeroli S., Jardim-Goncalves R. (2021). Towards a conceptual framework for developing sustainable digital innovation hubs. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, 1-7. DOI: 10.1109/ICE/ITMC52061.2021.9570120

Tea Mijac, Mario Jadric, Maja Cukušic, Marco Savastano, Sustainable Digital Transformation: SDG-Aligned Bibliometric Mapping in "CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT STUDIES" 2/2025, pp 37-52, DOI: 10.3280/cgrds2-2025oa21122