The value relevance of the fair value hierarchy. Empirical evidence from the European Union

Author/s Alessandro Mechelli, Vincenzo Sforza, Alessandra Stefanoni, Riccardo Cimini
Publishing Year 2018 Issue 2018/2
Language English Pages 29 P. 7-35 File size 539 KB
DOI 10.3280/FR2018-002002
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

This paper investigates the value relevance of the fair value hierarchy disclosed for financial instruments through a sample of 97 financial entities listed over the period 2011-2016 in the stock markets of 23 European countries. Its main objectives are threefold. First, by analysing the European setting, the paper means to study the value relevance of the fair value hierarchy to judge the choice of the International Accounting Standard Board (IASB) to extend the disclosure of the hierarchy to all the assets and liabilities. Second, the paper aims to evaluate the choice of abandoning management intent as a criterion for the classification and measurement of financial instruments investigating the effect that such an intent has on the value relevance of the fair value hierarchy. Finally, by studying the effect that exposure to risks has on the value relevance of the fair value hierarchical levels, the paper plans to investigate the implications that the disclosure of the hierarchy could have on the rules of Basel 3 capital adequacy. Formulating three different research hypotheses, the findings validate them providing evidence that the value relevance of fair value measurement depends on the source of inputs used to estimate fair value and that both management intent and the risk intensity of the asset book only affect the value relevance of the less reliable fair value estimates. These results are useful for standard setters and regulators. Actually, for the investors decisions, they suggest the importance of disclosing the fair value hierarchy for all the assets and liabilities as required by IFRS 13, as well as the advantage of replacing in IFRS 9 the management intent criterion with the business model test and the characteristics of the instruments for the classification and measurement of financial assets. For the future, the findings suggest the opportunity to introduce filters within the common equity tier 1 for the less reliable fair value estimates. This paper’s current and future implications for standard setters and regulators are to avoid earnings management and capital management behaviour possibly affecting the quality of financial reporting.

Keywords: Value relevance, fair value hierarchy, IFRS 13, financial entities

Jel codes: M41

  1. Aboody D., Barth M.E. and Kasznik R. (2006), Do firms understate stock optionbased compensation expense disclosed under FAS 123? Review of Accounting Studies, 11(4), pp. 429-461.
  2. Ahmed A.S. and Takeda C. (1995), Stock Market Valuation of Gains and Losses on Commercial Banks’ Investment Securities: An Empirical Analysis, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(2), pp. 207-225. DOI: 10.1016/0165-4101(95)00396-Z
  3. Ahmed A.S., Takeda C. and Thomas, S. (1999), Bank loan loss provisions: a reexamination of capital management, earnings management and signalling effects, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28(1), pp. 1-25. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4101(99)00017-8
  4. Azzali S. (2012), The conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting and Accounting Studies for Capital Market, Financial Reporting, 4, pp. 109-118. DOI: 10.3280/FR2012-004007
  5. Azzali S., Fornaciari L. and Pesci C. (2012), Reddito d’impresa e Value Relevance per gli investitori, Economia Aziendale Online, 3(1), pp. 1-19.
  6. Bank of Italy (2005), Banks’ financial statements: layout and preparation, Circular No. 262. Barth M., Landsman W. and Lang M. (2008), International Accounting Standards and accounting quality, Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), pp. 467-498.
  7. Barth M.E., Beaver W.H. and Landsman W.R. (1996), Valuation characteristics of equity book value and net income: Tests of the abandonment hypothesis, Working paper, Stanford University.
  8. Barth M.E., Beaver W.H. and Landsman W.R. (2001), The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), pp. 77-104. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00019-2
  9. Barth M.E. and Clinch G. (2009), Scale Effects in Capital Markets-Based Accounting Research, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 36(3-4), pp. 253-288.
  10. Bartov E., Mohanram P. and Nissim D. (2007), Managerial Discretion and the Economic Determinants of the Volatility Parameter for Valuing ESOs, The Review of Accounting Studies, 12(1), pp. 155-179.
  11. Blundell-Wignall A., Atkinson P. and Roulet C. (2013), Bank business models and the Basel system: complexity and interconnectedness, Financial Market Trends, Vol. 2, pp. 1-29. DOI: 10.1787/19952872
  12. Broberg P., Tagesson T. and Collin S.O. (2010), What explains variation in voluntary disclosure? A study of the annual reports of corporations listed on the Stockholm Stock Exchange, Journal of Management and Governance, 14(4), pp. 351-377.
  13. Brown S., Lo K. and Lys T. (1999), Use of R2 in accounting research: measuring changes in value relevance over the last four decades? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28(2), pp. 83-115. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4101(99)00023-3
  14. Chambers, D., Linsmeier, T.J., Shakespeare, C. and Sougiannis, T. (2007), An Evaluation of SFAS No. 130 Comprehensive Income Disclosures, Review of Accounting Studies, 12(4), pp. 557-593.
  15. Collins, D.W., Pincus, M. and Xie, W. (1999), Equity valuation and negative earnings: The role of book value of equity, The Accounting Review, 74(1), pp. 29-61.
  16. Dainelli F. and Giunta F. (2011), The value relevance of non-financial performance indicators: new cues from the European fashion industry, Financial Reporting, 3, pp. 81-102. DOI: 10.3280/FR2011-SU003005
  17. Danbolt J. and Rees W. (2008), An experiment in fair value accounting: UK investment vehicles, European Accounting Review, 17(2), pp. 271-303. DOI: 10.1080/09638180701819865
  18. Devalle A., Onali E. and Magarini R. (2010), Assessing the value relevance of accounting data after the introduction of IFRS in Europe, Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 21(2), pp. 85-119.
  19. Easton P.D. (1999), Security returns and the value relevance accounting data, Accounting Horizons, 13(4), pp. 399-412.
  20. Easton P.D. and Harris T.S. (1991), Earnings as an Explanatory Variable for Returns, Journal of Accounting Research, 29(1), pp. 19-36.
  21. Fornaciari L. (2013), La value relevance per l’utilità dei financial reporting, Torino: G. Giappichelli Editore.
  22. Goh B., Li D., Ng J. and Yong K. (2015), Market pricing of banks’ fair value assets reported under SFAS 157 since the 2008 financial crisis, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(2), pp. 129-145.
  23. Healy P.M. and Wahlen J.M. (1999), A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting, Accounting Horizons, 13(4), pp. 365-383.
  24. Hung M. and Subramanyam K.R. (2007), Financial statement effects of adopting international accounting standards: the case of Germany, Review of Accounting Studies, 12(4), pp. 623-657.
  25. Jones D. (2000), Emerging problems with the Basel Capital Accord: regulatory capital arbitrage and related issue, Journal of Banking and Finance, 24, pp. 35-58. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-4266(99)00052-7
  26. Kolev K. (2009), Do Investors perceive marking-to-model as marking-to-myth? Early evidence from FAS No. 157 disclosure, Working paper, New York University.
  27. Koonce L., Nelson K.K. and Shakespeare C.M. (2011), Judging the relevance of fair value for financial instruments, The Accounting Review, 86(6), pp. 2075-2098.
  28. Kousenidis D.V., Ladas A.C. and Negakis C.I. (2009), Value relevance of conservative and non-conservative accounting information, The International Journal of Accounting, 44(3), pp. 219-238.
  29. Leuz C., Nanda D. and Wysocki P.D. (2003), Earnings management and investor protection: an international comparison, Journal of Financial Economics, 69(3), pp. 505-527. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00121-1
  30. Martin R.D., Rich J.S. and Wilks T.J. (2006), Auditing fair value measurements: A synthesis of relevant research, Accounting Horizons, 20(3), pp. 287-303.
  31. Mechelli A. and Cimini R. (2013), Assessing value relevance of comprehensive income in European banks and other financial institutions, Financial Reporting, 1, pp. 13-41. DOI: 10.3280/FR2013-001003
  32. Mechelli A. and Cimini R. (2014), Is Comprehensive Income value relevant and does location matter? Accounting in Europe, 11(1), pp. 59-87. DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2014.890777
  33. Mitra S. and Hossain M. (2009), Value-relevance of pension transition adjustments and other comprehensive income components in the adoption year of SFAS No. 158, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 33(3), pp. 279-301.
  34. Nelson K. (1996), Fair value accounting for commercial banks: An empirical analysis of FAS No.107, The Accounting Review, 71, pp. 161-182. --
  35. Nissim D. (2003), Reliability of banks’ fair value disclosure for loans, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 20, pp. 355-384. DOI: 10.1023/A:1024072317201
  36. Ohlson J.A. (1995), Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation, Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), pp. 661-688.
  37. Paglietti P. (2009), Earnings management, timely loss recognition and value relevance in Europe following the IFRS mandatory adoption: evidence from Italian listed companies, Economia Aziendale Online, 1(4), pp. 97-117.
  38. Quagli A. (2009), Dal fair value al fairy value: coerenza concettuale e condizioni di impiego del fair value negli IFRS, Financial Reporting, 1, pp. 94-120.
  39. Ramanna K. (2013), The international politics of IFRS harmonization, Accounting, Economics and Law, 3(2), pp. 1-46.
  40. Sannino G. (2014), Removing “reliability” from the IAS/IFRS framework. The EFRAG’s viewpoint, Financial Reporting, 1, pp. 131-138. DOI: 10.3280/FR2014-001005
  41. Siekkinen J. (2016), Value relevance of fair values in different investor protection environments, Accounting Forum, 40(1), pp. 1-15.
  42. Siekkinen J. (2017), Board characteristics and the value relevance of fair value, Journal of Management and Governance, 21(2), 435-471.
  43. Song C.J., Thomas W.B. and Yi H. (2010), Value relevance of FAS No. 157 Fair Value Hierarchy Information and the Impact of Corporate Governance Mechanisms, The Accounting Review, 85(4), pp. 1375-1410.
  44. Van Cauwenberge P. and De Beelde I. (2007), On the IASB comprehensive income project: an analysis of the case for dual income display, Abacus, 43(1), pp. 1-26.
  45. Veltri S. and Ferraro O. (2012), La value relevance incrementale dell’other comprehensive income rispetto al net income. Un’analisi sulle società quotate in Italia, Financial Reporting, 3, pp. 9-29. DOI: 10.3280/FR2012-003002

  • Non-Fungible Token valuation: State of the art and future insight Paola Paoloni, Giuseppe Modaffari, Martina Manzo, in FINANCIAL REPORTING 2/2023 pp.39
    DOI: 10.3280/FR2023-002002

Alessandro Mechelli, Vincenzo Sforza, Alessandra Stefanoni, Riccardo Cimini, The value relevance of the fair value hierarchy. Empirical evidence from the European Union in "FINANCIAL REPORTING" 2/2018, pp 7-35, DOI: 10.3280/FR2018-002002