Social impact accounting. Methodologies, indicators and three case studies from Tuscany

Author/s Marco Bellucci, Carmela Nitti, Chiara Chimirri, Luca Bagnoli
Publishing Year 2019 Issue 2019/3
Language Italian Pages 23 P. 166-187 File size 282 KB
DOI 10.3280/MACO2019-003009
DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation click here

Below, you can see the article first page

If you want to buy this article in PDF format, you can do it, following the instructions to buy download credits

Article preview

FrancoAngeli is member of Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA), a not-for-profit association which run the CrossRef service enabling links to and from online scholarly content.

After the Italian third sector reform, third sector organizations and social enterpris-es have to cope with the accountability principle more than ever. They also need to find new strategies to report their results to their stakeholders and communities. The most critical issue that this article wants to tackle is to find a methodology for social impact accounting that is flexible, viable for organizations with very differ-ent characteristics (e.g. sector of intervention, dimension, legal forms, etc.), and scientifically robust. This article aims to identify a social impact accounting meth-odology that every third sector organization and social enterprise could implement. After the introduction and the literature review, the article presents a proposal for a social impact accounting model and case studies from a social enterprise and two third sector organizations in Tuscany. The last part of the article presents the final remarks and some suggestions for further research as, for example, the develop-ment of a public database of proxies to be used to provide a financial quantifica-tion for the social outcomes achieved by third sector organizations and social en-terprises.

Keywords: Impatto sociale, terzo settore, accountability, SROI, valutazione, sta-keholder engagement

  1. Aras G., Crowther D. (2016), The durable corporation: Strategies for sustainable development, Boca Raton, CRC Press.
  2. Arvidson M., Lyon F. (2014), Social impact measurement and non-profit organizations: Compliance, resistance, and promotion, VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(4), 869-886.
  3. Arvidson M., Lyon F., McKay S., Moro D. (2010), The ambitions and challenges of SROI, TSRC Working Paper 49, Birmingham, -- Available from Middlesex University’s Research at:
  4. Bagnoli L. (2010), Responsabilità sociale e modelli di misurazione, Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  5. Bagnoli L., Megali C. (2011), Measuring performance in social enterprises, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1), 149-165.
  6. Barman E. (2007), What is the bottom line for nonprofit organizations? A history of measurement in the British voluntary sector, VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 18(2), 101-115.
  7. Bellucci M., Bagnoli L., Biggeri M., Rinaldi V. (2012), Performance measurement in solidarity economy organizations: the case of fair-trade shops in Italy, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 83(1), 25-59.
  8. Bellucci M., Manetti G. (2018), Stakeholder Engagement and Sustainability Reporting, London, Routledge.
  9. Bellucci M., Nitti C., Franchi S., Testi E., Bagnoli L. (2019), Accounting for social return on investment (SROI): the costs and benefits of family-centered care by the Ronald McDonald House Charities, Social Enterprise Journal, 15(1), 46-75.
  10. Borzaga C., Fazzi L. (2014), Civil society, third sector, and healthcare: the case of social cooperatives in Italy, Social Science and Medicine, 123, 234-241.
  11. Bufali M.V., Ricciuti E. (2017), Valutazione di Impatto Sociale (VIS): fra dibattito accademico, evoluzione normativa e esperienze sul campo. Lo SROI di AVIS. Paper presented at XI Colloquio Scientifico sull’Impresa Sociale, 26-27 maggio 2017, Dipartimento di Scienze per l’Economia e l’Impresa, Università degli Studi di Firenze.
  12. Carnochan S., Samples M., Myers M., Austin M.J. (2013), Performance measurement challenges in nonprofit human service organizations, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(6), 1014-1032. DOI: 10.1177/0899764013508009
  13. CESVOT (2008), Tabella per la Valorizzazione dell’impegno Volontario (Rep.), Firenze, CESVOT.
  14. CESVOT (2009), La valutazione di impatto sociale dei progetti del volontariato sociale, Firenze, CESVOT.
  15. Chiaf E. (2015), Un’analisi degli indicatori di impatto sociale. Social impact indicators identification, Brescia, Centro Studi Socialis.
  16. Courtney P. (2017), Conceptualising social value for the third sector and developing methods for its assessment, VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(3), 541-557.
  17. Depedri S. (2016), La valutazione dell’impatto sociale nel Terzo Settore. Il posizionamento scientifico di Euricse e il metodo ImpACT, EURICSE.
  18. Ebrahim A., Rangan V.K. (2010), The limits of nonprofit impact: a contingency framework for measuring social performance. Harvard business school working papers, Harvard Business School.
  19. Elkington J. (1997), Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of 21st century, Oxford, Capstone publishing.
  20. Evans T.L. (2012), Occupy Education: Living and Learning Sustainability, New York, Peter Lang.
  21. EVPA (2013), A Practical guide to measuring and managing impact.
  22. Fasan M., Mio C. (2017), Fostering stakeholder engagement: The role of materiality disclosure in Integrated Reporting, Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(3), 288-305.
  23. FederSerd (2018), I costi sociali del gioco d’azzardo problematico in Italia.
  24. Fissi S., Gori E., Romolini A. (2013), La governance dei comuni sui servizi pubblici locali, Management Control, Special Issue 2, 87-110. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2013-002004
  25. Flockhart, A. (2005), Raising the profile of social enterprises: the use of social return on investment (SROI) and investment ready tools (IRT) to bridge the financial credibility gap, Social Enterprise Journal, 1(1), 29-42.
  26. Fondazione Luigi Einaudi (2016), Quanto vale il mercato nero delle ripetizioni scolastiche? Evasione per oltre 800 milioni di euro l’anno. Storia e numeri di un fallimento di Stato.
  27. Freeman A. (1984), Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Boston, Pitman.
  28. Gazzola P. (2012), CSR e reputazione nella creazione di valore sostenibile. Economia Aziendale Online, 2, 27-45.
  29. GECES (2015), Approcci proposti per la misurazione dell’impatto sociale, Sottogruppo GECES sulla misurazione dell’impatto 2014, Luxembourg, Commissione Europea.
  30. Giovine E., Taffari G. (2017), Impatto sociale: contesto giuridico ed evoluzioni normative, Paper presented at the Colloquio Scientifico sull’impresa sociale, Firenze.
  31. Gray R. (2006), Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organizational value creation? whose value? whose creation? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(6), 793-819. DOI: 10.1108/09513570610709872
  32. Hall M. (2014), Evaluation logics in the third sector, VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(2), 307-336.
  33. Hazenberg R., Bajwa-Patel M., Mazzei M., Roy M.J., Baglioni S. (2016), The role of institutional and stakeholder networks in shaping social enterprise ecosystems in Europe, Social Enterprise Journal, 12(3), 302-321.
  34. Istat (2017), Annuario Statistico.
  35. Istat (2016), La pratica Sportiva in Italia.
  36. Khandker Shahidur R., Koolwal Gayatri B., Samad, Hussain A. (2010), Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices. Washington, DC, World Bank.
  37. Klemelä J. (2016), Licence to operate: Social return on investment as a multidimensional discursive means of legitimating organisational action, Social Enterprise Journal, 12(3), 387-408. DOI: 10.1108/SEJ-02-2015-0004
  38. Laine M. (2010). Towards Sustaining the Status Quo: Business Talk of Sustainability in Finnish Corporate Disclosures 1987-2005, European Accounting Review, 19(2), 247-274.
  39. Lucianetti L. (2011), L’adozione della Balanced Scorecard: I risultati di una ricerca empirica, Management Control, 3, 39-66. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2011-003003
  40. Maier F., Schober C., Simsa R., Millner R. (2015), SROI as a method for evaluation research: Understanding merits and limitations, VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(5), 1805-1830.
  41. Manetti G. (2006), Il triple bottom line reporting: dal coinvolgimento degli stakeholder alle verifiche esterne, Milano, FrancoAngeli.
  42. Manetti G. (2014), The Role of Blended Value Accounting in the Evaluation of Socio-Economic Impact of Social Enterprises, Voluntas, 25(2), 443-464.
  43. Manetti G., Toccafondi S. (2013), Il coinvolgimento degli stakeholder nella governance e nel reporting delle fondazioni bancarie, Management Control, 3, 51-76. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2013-003004
  44. Manetti G., Bellucci M., Como E., Bagnoli L. (2015), Investing in Volunteering: Measuring Social Returns of Volunteer Recruitment, Training and Management. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(5), 2104-2129.
  45. Marchi L., Greco G. (2016), Percorsi di integrazione tra auditing e controllo di gestione, Management Control, 3, 5-8. DOI: 10.3280/MACO2016-003001
  46. Matacena A. (2012), L’accountability nelle imprese lucrative e sociali. Verso una possibile convergenza?, Economia Aziendale Online, 4, 171-206.
  47. Mattei M. M. (2017), L’accountabilty cooperativa: l’obbligo contabile, in Matacena A. (ed), Le cooperative imprese “Altere”, Milano, FrancoAngeli, pp. 137-154.
  48. Mauro V., Biggeri M., Deepak S., Trani J., Kumar Y.B., Ramasamy P., Bakhshi P., Giriyappa R. (2012), Impact of CBRc Community-Based Rehabilitation programme in Mandya district (Karnataka, India), Università degli Studi di Firenze.
  49. Mauro V., Biggeri M., Grilli L. (2015), Does community-based rehabilitation enhance the multidimensional well-being of deprived persons with disabilities? A multilevel impact evaluation, World Development, 76, 190-202.
  50. Millar R., Hall K. (2013), Social Return on Investment (SROI) and Performance Measurement: The opportunities and barriers for social enterprises in health and social care, Public Management Review, 15(6), 923-941.
  51. Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico (2015), Guida per startup innovative a vocazione sociale alla redazione del “Documento di Descrizione dell’Impatto Sociale”.
  52. Mook L., Chan A., Kershaw D. (2015), Measuring social enterprise value creation, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 26(2), 189-207.
  53. Mook L., Maiorano J., Ryan S., Armstrong A., Quarter J. (2015), Turning Social Return on Investment on Its Head: The Stakeholder Impact Statement, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 26(2), 229-246.
  54. Nicholls J. (2017), Social return on investment – Development and convergence, Evaluation and Program Planning, 64, 127-135.
  55. Nicholls J., Lawlor E., Neitzert E., Goodspeed T. (2009), A guide to social return on investment, Office of the Third Sector, London, The Cabinet Office.
  56. Nidumolu R., Prahalad C.K., Rangaswami M.R. (2009), Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation, Harvard business review, 87(9), 56-64.
  57. Pathak P., Dattani P. (2014), Social return on investment: three technical challenges, Social Enterprise Journal, 10(2), 91-104.
  58. Pesci C., Andrei P. (2011), An empirical investigation into the boundary of corporate social reports and consolidated financial statements, Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 31(1), 73-84.
  59. Rinaldi L., Bonacchi M. (2012), Managing and measuring sustainability: The business case of public utility industry, Economia Aziendale Online, 1, 147-174.
  60. Rotheroe N., Richards A. (2007), Social return on investment and social enterprise: transparent accountability for sustainable development, Social Enterprise Journal, 3(1), 31-48.
  61. Ryan P.W., Lyne I. (2008), Social enterprise and the measurement of social value: methodological issues with the calculation and application of the social return on investment, Education, Knowledge& Economy, 2(3), 223-237.
  62. Sammarco F., Liotta L., Scognamiglio E., Testa L., Vitale S. (2018), Valutazione d’impatto ed imprese sociali: caratteristiche a confronto, Paper presentato in occasione del XII Colloquio Scientifico sull’impresa sociale, 25 maggio 2018, Dipartimento di Sociologia e Ricerca Sociale, Università degli Studi di Trento.
  63. Socialis (2017), Valutare per dare valore: l’impatto sociale del terzo settore.
  64. Venturi P. (2017), Valore e potenziale dell’impresa sociale. Economie plurali per generare progresso e impatto sociale.
  65. WeWorld (2015), Lost Dispersione Scolastica. Il costo per la collettività e il ruolo di scuole e Terzo Settore.
  66. Wilson D., Bull M.F. (2013), SROI in practice: the wooden canal boat society, Social Enterprise Journal, 9(3), 315-325.
  67. Zamagni S., Venturi P., Rago S. (2015), Valutare l’impatto sociale. La questione della misurazione nelle imprese sociali, Impresa Sociale, 6, 77.

  • The cultural dimension as a key value driver of the sustainable development at a strategic level: an integrated five-dimensional approach Ivo Hristov, Antonio Chirico, in Environment, Development and Sustainability /2023 pp.7011
    DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02345-z
  • Le società Benefit in Italia: un'analisi sulla diffusione e sulle prassi di rendicontazione Silvia Cantele, Giacomo Troisi, Bettina Campedelli, in MANAGEMENT CONTROL 2/2021 pp.107
    DOI: 10.3280/MACO2021-002006
  • Gestione integrata dei dati e performance aziendali Antonella Paolini, in MANAGEMENT CONTROL 2/2022 pp.5
    DOI: 10.3280/MACO2022-002001

Marco Bellucci, Carmela Nitti, Chiara Chimirri, Luca Bagnoli, Rendicontare l’impatto sociale. Metodologie, indicatori e tre casi di sperimentazione in Toscana in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" 3/2019, pp 166-187, DOI: 10.3280/MACO2019-003009